IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1893-d115832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Leadership on Project-Based Organizational Innovation Performance: The Mediator of Knowledge Sharing and Moderator of Social Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Junwei Zheng

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Guangdong Wu

    (Department of Construction Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Hongtao Xie

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

With the increasing importance of leadership in project-based organizations, innovation is essential for the sustainable development of construction projects. Since few studies have explored the relationship between leadership and innovation in construction projects, this study fills this research gap and makes a significant theoretical contribution to the existing body of literature. Based on a knowledge-rated and resource-based view, this study aims to investigate various effects of different types of leadership on innovation performance in a construction project-based organization. Therefore, a theoretical model was constructed to explore the mediation mechanism and boundary condition of different types of leadership to improve innovation. The theoretical model was validated with empirical data covering project managers and engineers from the project-based organization in China via regression analysis and path analysis. The results show that transformational leadership and transactional leadership have some positively significant effects on knowledge sharing and innovation performance. Meanwhile, knowledge sharing partially mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and/or transactional leadership and innovation performance. Additionally, by considering different levels of social capital, transformational leadership is likely to have a strong positive impact on innovation performance through knowledge sharing. Our findings ensure a better understanding of the role of leadership, knowledge management, and social capital in the innovation process of construction projects. Therefore, project managers should promote a higher stimulation of a leadership behavior, encouraging knowledge management, and establishing the social capital, thus improving the innovation performance in the project-based organizations in construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Junwei Zheng & Guangdong Wu & Hongtao Xie, 2017. "Impacts of Leadership on Project-Based Organizational Innovation Performance: The Mediator of Knowledge Sharing and Moderator of Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1893-:d:115832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alicia Mas-Tur & Domingo Ribeiro Soriano, 2014. "The level of innovation among young innovative companies: the impacts of knowledge-intensive services use, firm characteristics and the entrepreneur attributes," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(1), pages 51-63, March.
    2. Weiping Jiang & Xianbo Zhao & Jiongbin Ni, 2017. "The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Employee Sustainable Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Birasnav, M., 2014. "Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1622-1629.
    4. Hai-Ping Lin & Tai-Shan Hu, 2017. "Knowledge Interaction and Spatial Dynamics in Industrial Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Gayle Avery, 2016. "Sustainable Leadership Practices Driving Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Thai SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Francesc Solé Parellada & Domingo Ribeiro Soriano & Kun-Huang Huarng, 2011. "An overview of the service industries' future (priorities: linking past and future)," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1-6, January.
    7. Michael W. Browne & Robert Cudeck, 1992. "Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 230-258, November.
    8. Toke Reichstein & Ammon Salter & David Gann, 2005. "Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 631-644.
    9. del Mar Benavides-Espinosa, María & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2014. "Cooperative learning in creating and managing joint ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 648-655.
    10. Yu-Bing Wang & Ching-Wei Ho, 2017. "No Money? No Problem! The Value of Sustainability: Social Capital Drives the Relationship among Customer Identification and Citizenship Behavior in Sharing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Ekaterina Turkina & Mai Thi Thanh Thai, 2013. "Social capital, networks, trust and immigrant entrepreneurship: a cross‐country analysis," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 108-124, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joonhyuck Lee & Dongsik Jang & Sangsung Park, 2017. "Deep Learning-Based Corporate Performance Prediction Model Considering Technical Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Delin Zeng & Jingbo Hu & Taohua Ouyang, 2017. "Managing Innovation Paradox in the Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Ambidextrous Capability in a Focal Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Nina Rung-Hoch, 2017. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation in Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Tomás Félix González-Cruz & Norat Roig-Tierno & Dolores Botella-Carrubí, 2018. "Quality management as a driver of innovation in the service industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(3), pages 505-524, September.
    5. Adnan Ahmed Sheikh & Aneeq Inam & Anila Rubab & Usama Najam & Naeem Ahmad Rana & Hayat Muhammad Awan, 2019. "The Spiritual Role of a Leader in Sustaining Work Engagement: A Teacher-Perceived Paradigm," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    6. I Ketut Setia Sapta & I Nengah Sudja & I Nengah Landra & Ni Wayan Rustiarini, 2021. "Sustainability Performance of Organization: Mediating Role of Knowledge Management," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Sascha Kraus & Janina Burtscher & Christine Vallaster & Martin Angerer, 2018. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship Orientation: A Reflection on Status-Quo Research on Factors Facilitating Responsible Managerial Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Najam ul zia & Ladislav Burita & Yumei Yang, 2023. "Inter-organizational social capital of firms in developing economies and industry 4.0 readiness: the role of innovative capability and absorptive capacity," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 661-682, February.
    9. Rubén Trigueros & José M. Aguilar-Parra & Adolfo J. Cangas & Joaquín F. Álvarez, 2019. "Validation of the Scale of Emotional States in the Physical Education Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Skallerud, Kåre & Korneliussen, Tor & Olsen, Svein Ottar, 2009. "An examination of consumers’ cross-shopping behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 181-189.
    11. Morosan, Cristian, 2016. "An empirical examination of U.S. travelers’ intentions to use biometric e-gates in airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 120-128.
    12. David, Alexandra, 2017. "Migrantisches Unternehmertum: Eine Chance der Arbeitsmarkintegration für geflüchtete Menschen?," Forschung Aktuell 02/2017, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    13. Jun Hong Park & Sang Ho Kook & Hyeonu Im & Soomin Eum & Chulung Lee, 2018. "Fabless Semiconductor Firms’ Financial Performance Determinant Factors: Product Platform Efficiency and Technological Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Amin Pourbarkhordari & Er Hua Zhou & Javad Pourkarimi, 2016. "How Individual-focused Transformational Leadership Enhances Its Influence on Job Performance through Employee Work Engagement," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 249-249, January.
    15. chatterjee, susmita, 2017. "Empowerment translated to transition," MPRA Paper 80067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Krzysztof BORODAKO & Jadwiga BERBEKA & Michał RUDNICKI & Mariusz ŠAPCZYŃSKI, 2021. "Online Visibility and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Performance: The Scope of Interrelatedness," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 157-173, August.
    17. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Ssu-Chi Pan & Tai-Shan Hu & Ben-Zin Chia & Su-Li Chang & Hai-Ping Lin, 2022. "Does Knowledge Evolution Matter? Reflection on Alpine Tribes Industry, Development, and Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Hsu, Chia-Lin & Chang, Chi-Ya & Yansritakul, Chutinart, 2017. "Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 145-152.
    20. Grzegorz Tchorek & Michał Brzozowski & Katarzyna Dziewanowska & Agnieszka Allen & Waldemar Kozioł & Michał Kurtyka & Filip Targowski, 2020. "Social Capital and Value Co-Creation: The Case of a Polish Car Sharing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1893-:d:115832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.