IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i6p527-d71115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning from Regional Sustainable Development in The Netherlands: Explorations from a Learning History

Author

Listed:
  • Sietske Smulders-Dane

    (Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Rachelsmolen 1, P.O. Box 347, Eindhoven 5600 AH, The Netherlands)

  • Toine Smits

    (Van HallLarenstein University of Applied Sciences, Velp 6882 CT, The Netherlands
    Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen 6525 AJ, The Netherlands)

  • Glen Fielding

    (Glen Fielding Consulting, Portland, OR 97229-7584, USA)

  • Yvonne Chang

    (Yvonne Chang Consulting, Portland, OR 97212-0231, USA)

  • Kirsten Kuipers

    (Groene Hart Groesbeek, Groesbeek 6562ZT11, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This case report is about a regional land-use planning project in the Netherlands. Initiated by the province of Gelderland and Radboud University (RU), the project aimed to create “Communities of Ownership” (CoO’s), local associations of townspeople who would engage in collaborative vision-building related to sustainable land development. The guiding conceptual model was “The Natural Step” (TNS), a systems-level approach to sustainability. We describe the land-use project and the learning history we constructed to help project managers and facilitators learn from the different perspectives that project actors conveyed. The learning history indicated that the project had limited success. We discuss four factors shaping the project’s results and the lessons learned related to those factors. The first lesson concerns the importance of a shared vision for sustainability among stakeholder groups. The second focuses on the preconditions necessary to work with The Natural Step effectively in certain contexts. Lesson three is about what it takes for a learning history to serve as a catalyst for collective learning and project improvement. Lesson four sheds light on the importance of respecting differences in stakeholders’ levels of sustainability awareness. We speculate that these differences may have shared characteristics with the kind of developmental differences that constructivist stage theorists of human development have articulated. Finally, we discuss the implications of our analysis for the leadership of sustainability initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Sietske Smulders-Dane & Toine Smits & Glen Fielding & Yvonne Chang & Kirsten Kuipers, 2016. "Learning from Regional Sustainable Development in The Netherlands: Explorations from a Learning History," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:6:p:527-:d:71115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/6/527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/6/527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Göran Broman & John Holmberg & Karl-Henrik Robört, 2000. "Simplicity Without Reduction: Thinking Upstream Towards the Sustainable Society," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 13-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magnus Boström & Erik Andersson & Monika Berg & Karin Gustafsson & Eva Gustavsson & Erik Hysing & Rolf Lidskog & Erik Löfmarck & Maria Ojala & Jan Olsson & Benedict E. Singleton & Sebastian Svenberg &, 2018. "Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Review and Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Orenstein, Daniel E. & Shach-Pinsley, Dalit, 2017. "A Comparative Framework for Assessing Sustainability Initiatives at the Regional Scale," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 245-256.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey P Hammond & Hayley R Howard & Andrew Tuck, 2012. "Risk assessment of UK biofuel developments within the rapidly evolving energy and transport sectors," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(5), pages 526-548, October.
    2. Marina Dabic & Mario Orac & Tugrul U Daim, 2016. "Targeting sustainable competitiveness in Croatia by implementation of “20 Keys” methodology," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Smith, Leigh & Ball, Peter, 2012. "Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 227-238.
    4. Hammond, Geoffrey P., 2009. "Industrial energy analysis, thermodynamics and sustainability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(7-8), pages 675-700, July.
    5. Liesel Carlsson & Edith Callaghan & Adrian Morley & Göran Broman, 2017. "Food System Sustainability across Scales: A Proposed Local-To-Global Approach to Community Planning and Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Geoffrey P. Hammond, 2006. "‘People, planet and prosperity’: The determinants of humanity's environmental footprint," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 30(1), pages 27-36, February.
    7. Mubashir Qasim, 2018. "Some Links between Sustainability and Well-Being," Working Papers in Economics 18/13, University of Waikato.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:6:p:527-:d:71115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.