IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i11p1138-d82199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Urban Sprawl in Chinese Port Cities from 1979 to 2013

Author

Listed:
  • Minmin Li

    (Renewable Resources Division, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 20 DaTun Road, Beijing 100101, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
    UMR TETIS Maison de la Télédétection, La Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, 500 Rue Jean François Breton, 34000 Montpellier, France)

  • Zengxiang Zhang

    (Renewable Resources Division, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 20 DaTun Road, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Danny Lo Seen

    (UMR TETIS Maison de la Télédétection, La Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, 500 Rue Jean François Breton, 34000 Montpellier, France)

  • Jian Sun

    (Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, 3200 Croul Hall, Irvine, CA 92697, USA)

  • Xiaoli Zhao

    (Renewable Resources Division, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 20 DaTun Road, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

China has been through a period of remarkable urban sprawl since the reform and opening-up policy in 1978, with the highest urbanization occurring in the coastal zones. Sustainable urban development requires a better understanding of the spatiotemporal characteristics of urbanization. This study systematically explored urban sprawl in Chinese coastal cities with a visual interpretation method from 1979 to 2013. The results show that urban built-up areas kept increasing at a faster pace during the study period (i.e., increased about 9-fold in 34 years), especially in the first decade of the 21st century. Spatially, urban sprawl intensity generally peaked in the urban fringe. Urban built-up areas expanded mostly at a cost to cultivated land and non-urban built-up land, and became more irregular and less compact through the study period. Land-use policies, economic development levels, port developments and locations are all closely related with urban sprawl in these port cities. The results also suggest that improving the utilization efficiency of urban land and coordinating the development of city and port are necessary and important for sustainable development in coastal cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Minmin Li & Zengxiang Zhang & Danny Lo Seen & Jian Sun & Xiaoli Zhao, 2016. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Urban Sprawl in Chinese Port Cities from 1979 to 2013," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1138-:d:82199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annemarie Schneider & Curtis E. Woodcock, 2008. "Compact, Dispersed, Fragmented, Extensive? A Comparison of Urban Growth in Twenty-five Global Cities using Remotely Sensed Data, Pattern Metrics and Census Information," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(3), pages 659-692, March.
    2. Theo E. Notteboom * & Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2005. "Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 297-313, July.
    3. Cohen, Barney, 2004. "Urban Growth in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Trends and a Caution Regarding Existing Forecasts," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 23-51, January.
    4. Tian, Guangjin & Jiang, Jing & Yang, Zhifeng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2011. "The urban growth, size distribution and spatio-temporal dynamic pattern of the Yangtze River Delta megalopolitan region, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 865-878.
    5. Yu-Hsin Tsai, 2005. "Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness versus 'Sprawl'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(1), pages 141-161, January.
    6. Bolund, Per & Hunhammar, Sven, 1999. "Ecosystem services in urban areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 293-301, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weihao Shi & Jian Tian & Aihemaiti Namaiti & Xiaoxu Xing, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Coupling Coordination between Urbanization and Urban Resilience: A Case Study of the 167 Counties in Hebei Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Tong, De & Wang, Zhenguo & Hong, Yu Hung & Liu, Chengming, 2019. "Assessing the possibility of charging for public leasehold renewal in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Wenjie Cai & Tu Fangyuan, 2020. "Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving forces of construction land expansion in Yangtze River economic belt, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Ying Zheng & Jingzhu Zhao & Guofan Shao, 2020. "Port City Sustainability: A Review of Its Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miriam Steurer & Caroline Bayr, 2020. "Measuring Urban Sprawl using Land Use Data," Graz Economics Papers 2020-02, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    2. Salvati, Luca & Sateriano, Adele & Grigoriadis, Efstathios & Carlucci, Margherita, 2017. "New wine in old bottles: The (changing) socioeconomic attributes of sprawl during building boom and stagnation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 361-372.
    3. Luca Salvati & Vittorio Gargiulo Morelli, 2014. "Unveiling Urban Sprawl in the Mediterranean Region: Towards a Latent Urban Transformation?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1935-1953, November.
    4. Luca Salvati, 2019. "Examining urban functions along a metropolitan gradient: a geographically weighted regression tells you more," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 19-40, April.
    5. Sha Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Cifang Wu & Yanmei Ye, 2019. "Combined Impact of Socioeconomic Forces and Policy Implications: Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of the Ecosystem Services Value in Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Kai Jin & Fei Wang & Pengfei Li, 2018. "Responses of Vegetation Cover to Environmental Change in Large Cities of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Luca Salvati, 2013. "Struttura produttiva, dinamiche di diffusione urbana e distribuzione spaziale dell?impermeabilizzazione del suolo: un?analisi esplorativa a scala locale," RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 22-36.
    8. Mariateresa Ciommi & Francesco M. Chelli & Margherita Carlucci & Luca Salvati, 2018. "Urban Growth and Demographic Dynamics in Southern Europe: Toward a New Statistical Approach to Regional Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Luca Salvati, 2014. "Towards a Polycentric Region? The Socio-economic Trajectory of Rome, an ‘Eternally Mediterranean’ City," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 268-284, July.
    10. Goran Krsnik & Sonia Reyes-Paecke & Keith M. Reynolds & Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo & José Ramón González Olabarria, 2023. "Assessing Relativeness in the Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: Better Comparison Methods for Improved Well-Being," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Patrick Witte & Frank Van Oort & Bart Wiegmans & Tejo Spit, 2013. "Capitalising on Spatiality in European Transport Corridors," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(4), pages 510-517, September.
    12. Gaodi Xie & Wenhui Chen & Shuyan Cao & Chunxia Lu & Yu Xiao & Changshun Zhang & Na Li & Shuo Wang, 2014. "The Outward Extension of an Ecological Footprint in City Expansion: The Case of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. P. Hlaváčková & D. Šafařík, 2016. "Quantification of the utility value of the recreational function of forests from the aspect of valuation practice," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(8), pages 345-356.
    14. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    15. David Guerrero, 2020. "A global analysis of hinterlands from a European perspective. In: Global Logistics Network Modelling and Policy: Quantification and Analysis for International Freight," Post-Print hal-02551947, HAL.
    16. Alexander V. Rusanov, 2019. "Dacha dwellers and gardeners: garden plots and second homes in Europe and Russia," Population and Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 3(1), pages 107-124, April.
    17. Chen, Qifei & Wang, Meng, 2022. "Opening of high-speed rail and the consumer service industry: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 31-45.
    18. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1138-:d:82199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.