IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i8p11010-11031d54078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Amparo Baviera-Puig

    (Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain)

  • Tomás Gómez-Navarro

    (Energy Engineering Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain)

  • Mónica García-Melón

    (INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain)

  • Gabriel García-Martínez

    (Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain)

Abstract

Sustainability reports are tools for disseminating information to stakeholders and the public, serving the organizations in the dual purpose of communicating CSR and being accountable. The production of these reports has recently become more prevalent in the food industry, despite the fact this practice has received heavy criticism on two fronts: The quality of the tool for communication, and the extent of accountability. In addition to these criticisms, organizations must overcome the additional challenge of publishing sustainability reports that successfully meet the demands of a multi-stakeholder audience. In light of the importance of this practice, this paper presents a method to assess the communication and accountability characteristics of Spanish food companies’ sustainability reports. This method is based on the method Analytic Network Process (ANP) and adopts a multi-stakeholder approach. This research, therefore, provides a reference model for improving sustainability reports, with the aim of successfully meeting their communication objectives and the demands of all stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Amparo Baviera-Puig & Tomás Gómez-Navarro & Mónica García-Melón & Gabriel García-Martínez, 2015. "Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:8:p:11010-11031:d:54078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/11010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/8/11010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khosro Jahdi & Gaye Acikdilli, 2009. "Marketing Communications and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Marriage of Convenience or Shotgun Wedding?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 103-113, August.
    2. Kent Walker & Fang Wan, 2012. "The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 227-242, August.
    3. A. Lindgreen & Y.T. Xu & F. Maon & J. Wilcock, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility brand leadership: A multiple case study," Post-Print hal-00800278, HAL.
    4. Yongrok Choi & Yanni Yu, 2014. "The Influence of Perceived Corporate Sustainability Practices on Employees and Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Montazar, Aliasghar & Gheidari, Omid Nasiri & Snyder, Richard L., 2013. "A fuzzy analytical hierarchy methodology for the performance assessment of irrigation projects," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 113-123.
    6. Paul Ziek, 2009. "Making sense of CSR communication," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 137-145, May.
    7. Suresh Cuganesan & James Guthrie & Leanne Ward, 2010. "Examining CSR disclosure strategies within the Australian food and beverage industry," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3-4), pages 169-183, September.
    8. Hanna Kim & Won-Moo Hur & Junsang Yeo, 2015. "Corporate Brand Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Consumer Perception of CSR, Corporate Hypocrisy, and Corporate Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Isaac M. Lipkus & Greg Samsa & Barbara K. Rimer, 2001. "General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    10. Lixin Shen & Kannan Govindan & Madan Shankar, 2015. "Evaluation of Barriers of Corporate Social Responsibility Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process under a Fuzzy Environment—A Textile Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, March.
    11. John Elkington, 2006. "Governance for Sustainability," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 522-529, November.
    12. Kristin Hah & Susan Freeman, 2014. "Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries and their CSR: A Conceptual Framework of the Management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 125-136, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Larisa Ivascu & Attila Turi & Alin Artene & George Artur Găman, 2019. "Sustainable Development Model for the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Wen-Chi Lo & Ching-Hua Lu & Ying-Chyi Chou, 2020. "Application of Multicriteria Decision Making and Multi-Objective Planning Methods for Evaluating Metropolitan Parks in Terms of Budget and Benefits," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. A. Sardi & E. Sorano, 2021. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Papers 2102.04090, arXiv.org.
    4. Ying-Chyi Chou & Chia-Han Yang & Ching-Hua Lu & Van Thac Dang & Pei-An Yang, 2017. "Building Criteria for Evaluating Green Project Management: An Integrated Approach of DEMATEL and ANP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Patrycja Hąbek, 2017. "CSR Reporting Practices in Visegrad Group Countries and the Quality of Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Maria Cleofe Giorgino & Enrico Supino & Federico Barnabè, 2017. "Corporate Disclosure, Materiality, and Integrated Report: An Event Study Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Nina Rung-Hoch, 2017. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation in Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Liubachyna, Anna & Secco, Laura & Pettenella, Davide, 2017. "Reporting practices of State Forest Enterprises in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 162-172.
    10. Alamo Alexandre da Silva Batista & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2018. "Organizational Sustainability Practices: A Study of the Firms Listed by the Corporate Sustainability Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Shilpee A. Dasgupta & Mayank Bhatia & Upasana Singh & Arghya Ray, 2022. "Impact of CSR on non-financial performance and the mediating role of trust and reputation: Indian manufacturing employees’ perspectives," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(2), pages 391-412, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baviera-Puig, Amparo & García-Martínez, Gabriel & Gómez-Navarro, Tomás, 2014. "Propuesta metodológica mediante ANP para la evaluación de las memorias de sostenibilidad del sector agroalimentario español," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(01), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Irina Lock & Peter Seele, 2015. "Analyzing Sector‐Specific CSR Reporting: Social and Environmental Disclosure to Investors in the Chemicals and Banking and Insurance Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 113-128, March.
    3. Andrew Crane & Sarah Glozer, 2016. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(7), pages 1223-1252, November.
    4. Marta Pizzetti & Lucia Gatti & Peter Seele, 2021. "Firms Talk, Suppliers Walk: Analyzing the Locus of Greenwashing in the Blame Game and Introducing ‘Vicarious Greenwashing’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 21-38, April.
    5. Xiaoqian Lu & Tong Sheng & Xiaolan Zhou & Chaohai Shen & Bingquan Fang, 2022. "How Does Young Consumers’ Greenwashing Perception Impact Their Green Purchase Intention in the Fast Fashion Industry? An Analysis from the Perspective of Perceived Risk Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Siano, Alfonso & Vollero, Agostino & Conte, Francesca & Amabile, Sara, 2017. "“More than words”: Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 27-37.
    7. Yvette Sterbenk & Sara Champlin & Kasey Windels & Summer Shelton, 2022. "Is Femvertising the New Greenwashing? Examining Corporate Commitment to Gender Equality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 491-505, May.
    8. Yang, Lei & Manika, Danae & Athanasopoulou, Andromachi, 2020. "Are they sinners or saints? A multi-level investigation of hypocrisy in organisational and employee pro-environmental behaviours," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 336-347.
    9. Ana Nave & João Ferreira, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility strategies: Past research and future challenges," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 885-901, July.
    10. Peter Seele & Irina Lock, 2015. "Instrumental and/or Deliberative? A Typology of CSR Communication Tools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 401-414, October.
    11. Vesela R. Veleva, 2010. "Managing corporate citizenship: a new tool for companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 40-51, January.
    12. Higgins, Colin & Tang, Samuel & Stubbs, Wendy, 2020. "On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 395-407.
    13. Qing Miao & Jun Zhou, 2020. "Corporate Hypocrisy and Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Perceived Importance of CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Vincent Amooti Bagire & Immaculate Tusiime & Grace Nalweyiso & John Bosco Kakooza, 2011. "Contextual environment and stakeholder perception of corporate social responsibility practices in uganda," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 102-109, March.
    15. Inyong Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Seongho Kang, 2016. "Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Performance: A Sequential Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Gary F. Peters & Andrea M. Romi & Juan Manuel Sanchez, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1065-1087, November.
    17. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:1:p:34-40 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Fuchsman, Dillon & McGee, Josh B. & Zamarro, Gema, 2023. "Teachers’ willingness to pay for retirement benefits: A national stated preferences experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Shaozhen Han & Guoming Li & Michel Lubrano & Zhou Xun, 2020. "Lie of the Weak: Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Activities of Chinese Zombie Firms," AMSE Working Papers 2001, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    21. Andrew Ngawenja Mzembe & Adam Lindgreen & François Maon & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2016. "Investigating the Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Tea Supply Chain: A Case Study of Eastern Produce Limited in Malawi," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 165-178, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:8:p:11010-11031:d:54078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.