IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3111-d1372340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Battery for Collective Self-Consumption and Energy Arbitrage: Independence Growth vs. Investment Cost-Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Mattia Pasqui

    (Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence (UNIFI), 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Becchi

    (Department of Information Engineering (DINFO), University of Florence (UNIFI), 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Marco Bindi

    (Department of Information Engineering (DINFO), University of Florence (UNIFI), 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Matteo Intravaia

    (Department of Information Engineering (DINFO), University of Florence (UNIFI), 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Francesco Grasso

    (Department of Information Engineering (DINFO), University of Florence (UNIFI), 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Gianluigi Fioriti

    (Department of Information Engineering (DINFO), University of Florence (UNIFI), 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Carlo Carcasci

    (Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence (UNIFI), 50121 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

Integrating a grid-connected battery into a renewable energy community amplifies the collective self-consumption of photovoltaic energy and facilitates energy arbitrage in the electricity markets. However, how much can energy independence really increase? Is it a cost-effective investment? The answer to these questions represents a novelty in the literature due to the innovative nature of the asset under consideration and the market and regulatory framework in which it is evaluated. Employing a net present value assessment, our analysis incorporated aging effects and conducts sensitivity analyses across various parameters: the number of community customers, electricity market prices, battery cost and size, and the decision to engage in energy arbitrage. Each scenario underwent a 20-year hourly simulation using an aging-aware rolling-horizon 24 h-looking-ahead scheduling, optimized with mixed-integer linear programming. Simulations conducted on the Italian market indicate that dedicating a battery solely to collective self-consumption is the most efficient solution for promoting a community’s energy independence, but it lacks economic appeal. However, integrating energy arbitrage, despite slight compromises in self-sufficiency and battery longevity, halves the payback period and enhances the attractiveness of larger battery investments. The net present value is contingent upon the battery size, customer number, and market prices. Nevertheless, if the battery cost does not exceed 200 EUR/kWh, the investment becomes cost-effective across all scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Mattia Pasqui & Lorenzo Becchi & Marco Bindi & Matteo Intravaia & Francesco Grasso & Gianluigi Fioriti & Carlo Carcasci, 2024. "Community Battery for Collective Self-Consumption and Energy Arbitrage: Independence Growth vs. Investment Cost-Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3111-:d:1372340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felice, Alex & Rakocevic, Lucija & Peeters, Leen & Messagie, Maarten & Coosemans, Thierry & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2022. "Renewable energy communities: Do they have a business case in Flanders?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    2. Weckesser, Tilman & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Blomgren, Emma M.V. & Schledorn, Amos & Madsen, Henrik, 2021. "Renewable Energy Communities: Optimal sizing and distribution grid impact of photo-voltaics and battery storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Gährs, Swantje & Knoefel, Jan, 2020. "Stakeholder demands and regulatory framework for community energy storage with a focus on Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Secchi, Mattia & Barchi, Grazia & Macii, David & Moser, David & Petri, Dario, 2021. "Multi-objective battery sizing optimisation for renewable energy communities with distribution-level constraints: A prosumer-driven perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    5. Casalicchio, Valeria & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Moser, David, 2022. "From investment optimization to fair benefit distribution in renewable energy community modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    6. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of energy arbitrage in community energy storage systems using different battery technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 356-372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shoaib Ahmed & Amjad Ali & Antonio D’Angola, 2024. "A Review of Renewable Energy Communities: Concepts, Scope, Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, February.
    2. Berg, Kjersti & Rana, Rubi & Farahmand, Hossein, 2023. "Quantifying the benefits of shared battery in a DSO-energy community cooperation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    3. Felice, Alex & Rakocevic, Lucija & Peeters, Leen & Messagie, Maarten & Coosemans, Thierry & Ramirez Camargo, Luis, 2022. "Renewable energy communities: Do they have a business case in Flanders?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    4. Anita Tatti & Sibilla Ferroni & Martina Ferrando & Mario Motta & Francesco Causone, 2023. "The Emerging Trends of Renewable Energy Communities’ Development in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Pia Szichta & Ingela Tietze, 2020. "Sharing Economy in der Elektrizitätswirtschaft: Treiber und Hemmnisse [Title sharing economy in the electricity sector: drivers and barriers]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 109-125, December.
    6. Terlouw, Tom & AlSkaif, Tarek & Bauer, Christian & van Sark, Wilfried, 2019. "Optimal energy management in all-electric residential energy systems with heat and electricity storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Lazzari, Florencia & Mor, Gerard & Cipriano, Jordi & Solsona, Francesc & Chemisana, Daniel & Guericke, Daniela, 2023. "Optimizing planning and operation of renewable energy communities with genetic algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    8. Piotr Krawczyk & Anna Śliwińska, 2020. "Eco-Efficiency Assessment of the Application of Large-Scale Rechargeable Batteries in a Coal-Fired Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Zhang, Yijie & Ma, Tao & Elia Campana, Pietro & Yamaguchi, Yohei & Dai, Yanjun, 2020. "A techno-economic sizing method for grid-connected household photovoltaic battery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Luis Fernando Grisales-Noreña & Oscar Danilo Montoya & Alberto-Jesus Perea-Moreno, 2023. "Optimal Integration of Battery Systems in Grid-Connected Networks for Reducing Energy Losses and CO 2 Emissions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Tao Xu & He Meng & Jie Zhu & Wei Wei & He Zhao & Han Yang & Zijin Li & Yuhan Wu, 2021. "Optimal Capacity Allocation of Energy Storage in Distribution Networks Considering Active/Reactive Coordination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    12. Jose-Maria Delgado-Sanchez & Isidoro Lillo-Bravo, 2020. "Influence of Degradation Processes in Lead–Acid Batteries on the Technoeconomic Analysis of Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    13. Herbes, Carsten & Rilling, Benedikt & Ringel, Marc, 2021. "Policy frameworks and voluntary markets for biomethane – How do different policies influence providers’ product strategies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    14. Negri, Simone & Giani, Federico & Blasuttigh, Nicola & Massi Pavan, Alessandro & Mellit, Adel & Tironi, Enrico, 2022. "Combined model predictive control and ANN-based forecasters for jointly acting renewable self-consumers: An environmental and economical evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 440-454.
    15. AlSkaif, Tarek & Dev, Soumyabrata & Visser, Lennard & Hossari, Murhaf & van Sark, Wilfried, 2020. "A systematic analysis of meteorological variables for PV output power estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 12-22.
    16. Bovera, Filippo & Lo Schiavo, Luca, 2022. "From energy communities to sector coupling:a taxonomy for regulatory experimentation in the age of the European Green Deal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Myriam Caratù & Valerio Brescia & Ilaria Pigliautile & Paolo Biancone, 2023. "Assessing Energy Communities’ Awareness on Social Media with a Content and Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Abdar, Moloud & Basiri, Mohammad Ehsan & Yin, Junjun & Habibnezhad, Mahmoud & Chi, Guangqing & Nemati, Shahla & Asadi, Somayeh, 2020. "Energy choices in Alaska: Mining people's perception and attitudes from geotagged tweets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    19. Keck, Felix & Jütte, Silke & Lenzen, Manfred & Li, Mengyu, 2022. "Assessment of two optimisation methods for renewable energy capacity expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    20. Gimelli, A. & Mottola, F. & Muccillo, M. & Proto, D. & Amoresano, A. & Andreotti, A. & Langella, G., 2019. "Optimal configuration of modular cogeneration plants integrated by a battery energy storage system providing peak shaving service," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 974-993.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3111-:d:1372340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.