IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6887-d1127532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprint Analysis of Ice Cream Production

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska

    (Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—National Research Institute, Department of Refrigeration Technology and Technique in Lodz, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Elżbieta Polak

    (Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agriculture and Food Biotechnology—National Research Institute, Department of Refrigeration Technology and Technique in Lodz, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Nowadays, a noticeable trend in society is the search for more and more healthy food products. This is also reflected in the interest in plant-based ingredients replacing animal ones, which are more caloric, difficult to digest, and have more negative environmental impact. The purpose of this study was to determine the carbon footprint (CF) of technological process of ice cream, made with traditional ingredients as well as with fat and sugar substitute ingredients, under laboratory and handcraft conditions. Process-line portable metering was designed and implemented. Emission and production data were recorded for different ice blends; at a laboratory-scale, the determined technological process, CF tech, of traditional ice cream was 0.360 and for ice cream with substitutes 0.385 kg CO 2 /kg product. The pasteurization process accounted for the largest share in CF tech of ice cream with different contents of substitutes. Under handicraft conditions, the CF tech of traditional ice cream as well as ice cream with fat and sugar substitutes were 0.253 and 0.248 kg CO 2 /kg product, respectively. In contrast, for standard a handcraft, CF was the lowest at 0.234 kg CO 2 /kg product. CF tech of laboratory-scale ice cream production is larger than for handcraft production. Pasteurization along with homogenization and ripening accounted for the largest share of CO 2 emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Wróbel-Jędrzejewska & Elżbieta Polak, 2023. "Carbon Footprint Analysis of Ice Cream Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6887-:d:1127532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6887/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6887/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jafaryani Jokandan, Majid & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid, 2015. "Comprehensive exergy analysis of an industrial-scale yogurt production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1832-1851.
    2. William E. Rees, 2002. "Footprint: our impact on Earth is getting heavier," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6913), pages 267-268, November.
    3. S. A. Montzka & E. J. Dlugokencky & J. H. Butler, 2011. "Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 476(7358), pages 43-50, August.
    4. Sundarakani, Balan & de Souza, Robert & Goh, Mark & Wagner, Stephan M. & Manikandan, Sushmera, 2010. "Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 43-50, November.
    5. Wolmet Barendregt & Aksel Biørn-Hansen & David Andersson, 2020. "Users’ Experiences with the Use of Transaction Data to Estimate Consumption-Based Emissions in a Carbon Calculator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Dong, Gang & Mao, Xianqiang & Zhou, Ji & Zeng, An, 2013. "Carbon footprint accounting and dynamics and the driving forces of agricultural production in Zhejiang Province, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 38-47.
    7. Dowlati, Majid & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Mojarab Soufiyan, Mohamad, 2017. "Exergetic performance analysis of an ice-cream manufacturing plant: A comprehensive survey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 445-459.
    8. Al-Mansour, F. & Jejcic, V., 2017. "A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: The case of Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 7-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Singh, Gurjeet & Singh, P.J. & Tyagi, V.V. & Barnwal, P. & Pandey, A.K., 2019. "Exergy and thermo-economic analysis of ghee production plant in dairy industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 602-618.
    3. Gurjeet Singh & K. Chopra & V. V. Tyagi & A. K. Pandey & R. K. Sharma & Ahmet Sari, 2022. "Estimation of thermodynamic and enviroeconomic characteristics of khoa (milk food) production unit," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12542-12581, November.
    4. Jianguo Li & Wenhui Yang & Yi Wang & Qiang Li & Lili Liu & Zhongqi Zhang, 2018. "Carbon Footprint and Driving Forces of Saline Agriculture in Coastally Reclaimed Areas of Eastern China: A Survey of Four Staple Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Khalife, Esmail & Roodbar Shojaei, Taha & Dadak, Ali, 2018. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a DI diesel engine fueled with diesel/biodiesel (B5) emulsions containing aqueous nano cerium oxide," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 967-978.
    6. Theodora Karanisa & Alexandre Amato & Renee Richer & Sara Abdul Majid & Cynthia Skelhorn & Sami Sayadi, 2021. "Agricultural Production in Qatar’s Hot Arid Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    8. Ge, Houtian & Baker, Quinton J. & Gomez, Miguel I. & Jaromczyk, Jerzy & Yi, Jing, 2022. "Assessing the carbon footprint of fresh produce assembly and distribution in the U.S," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322537, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Om Prakash Mishra & Mahesh Chand & Krishan Kumar & Prashant Mishra, 2023. "Investigating applicability of green supply chain management in manufacturing sectors," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 1183-1196, August.
    10. Nasir, Mohammed Haneef Abdul & Genovese, Andrea & Acquaye, Adolf A. & Koh, S.C.L. & Yamoah, Fred, 2017. "Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 443-457.
    11. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Spatio-temporal patterns of energy consumption-related GHG emissions in China's crop production systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 274-284.
    12. Ji, Guojun & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Yang, Guangyong, 2014. "Constructing sustainable supply chain under double environmental medium regulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 211-219.
    13. Maiyar, Lohithaksha M & Thakkar, Jitesh J, 2019. "Environmentally conscious logistics planning for food grain industry considering wastages employing multi objective hybrid particle swarm optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 220-248.
    14. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Miao, Lu, 2023. "The greenhouse gas rebound effect from increased energy efficiency across China's staple crops," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Yang, Yuxiang & Goodarzi, Shadi & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2022. "In-house production and outsourcing under different emissions reduction regulations: An equilibrium decision model for global supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Schaeffer, Michiel & Gohar, Laila & Kriegler, Elmar & Lowe, Jason & Riahi, Keywan & van Vuuren, Detlef, 2015. "Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 257-268.
    17. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    18. Meng, Xiaoge & Yao, Zhong & Nie, Jiajia & Zhao, Yingxue & Li, Zenglu, 2018. "Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: Effects of the power structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 224-230.
    19. Marek Borowski & Piotr Życzkowski & Jianwei Cheng & Rafał Łuczak & Klaudia Zwolińska, 2020. "The Combustion of Methane from Hard Coal Seams in Gas Engines as a Technology Leading to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Electricity Prediction Using ANN," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Devika Kannan & Vernika Agarwal & P. C. Jha, 2019. "Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 693-738, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6887-:d:1127532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.