IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2738-d1055924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable and Environmental Dyeing with MAUT Method Comparative Selection of the Dyeing Recipe

Author

Listed:
  • Meral Özomay

    (Department of Textile Engineering, Marmara University, 34722 Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

The textile industry is one of the most complex sectors, in terms of the materials and chemical processes used from petroleum and the environmental degradation during its production and disposal. It is therefore a sector looking for new possibilities and for more sustainable materials and applications. One option is to use natural dyes, as they are considered biodegradable, do not pollute the environment, and have potential use for many sectors, including the fashion industry. In this study, Alanya silk was dyed by a natural dyeing method with crocus sativus, Helichrysum arenarium, and Glycyrrhiza glabra L., plants that grow in and around the Alanya region. Quercus aegilops L. grown in the region was preferred as mordant, a natural binder, and is one of the plants with the highest tannin content, and it was used with a more environmentally friendly and sustainable approach to increase the binding in natural dyeing instead of chemical mordants. The aim is to provide an environmental and scientific contribution to the dyeing producers in this region. According to the MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) method, the best dyes in terms of fastness and color efficiency were determined as the dyes made with the Glycyrrhiza glabra L. plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Meral Özomay, 2023. "Sustainable and Environmental Dyeing with MAUT Method Comparative Selection of the Dyeing Recipe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2738-:d:1055924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bedford, Tim & Cooke, Roger, 1999. "A new generic model for applying MAUT," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 589-604, November.
    2. Ralph L. Keeney, 1974. "Multiplicative Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 22-34, February.
    3. F. Gungor & M. Akkaya, 2016. "Choosing the Appropriate Mordant via Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods in Natural Dyeing with Tea Extract," Scientific Review, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(2), pages 14-21, 02-2016.
    4. Livia Lara & Isabel Cabral & Joana Cunha, 2022. "Ecological Approaches to Textile Dyeing: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. James S. Dyer & Peter C. Fishburn & Ralph E. Steuer & Jyrki Wallenius & Stanley Zionts, 1992. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 645-654, May.
    6. Shahid Adeel & Fozia Anjum & Muhammad Zuber & Muhammad Hussaan & Nimra Amin & Meral Ozomay, 2022. "Sustainable Extraction of Colourant from Harmal Seeds ( Peganum harmala ) for Dyeing of Bio-Mordanted Wool Fabric," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Jeffrey C. Cegan & Ashley M. Filion & Jeffrey M. Keisler & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 123-133, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali E. Abbas & Ronald A. Howard, 2005. "Attribute Dominance Utility," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 185-206, December.
    2. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    4. Francisco J. André & Laura Riesgo, 2006. "A Duality Procedure to Elicit Nonlinear Multiattribute Utility Functions," Working Papers 06.02, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    5. Gomez-Limon, Jose Antonio & Riesgo, Laura & Arriaza Balmón, Manuel, 2003. "Multi-Criteria Analysis Of Factors Use Level: The Case Of Water For Irrigation," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25836, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Kik, M.C. & Claassen, G.D.H. & Meuwissen, M.P.M. & Smit, A.B. & Saatkamp, H.W., 2021. "Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Manel Baucells & Rakesh K. Sarin, 2003. "Group Decisions with Multiple Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 1105-1118, August.
    8. Gomez-Limon, Jose A. & Riesgo, Laura, 2004. "Irrigation water pricing: differential impacts on irrigated farms," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 47-66, July.
    9. W. Ukovich & S. Pastore & A. Premoli, 2001. "An Algorithm for Linearly-Constrained Piecewise Lexicographic Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 195-226, October.
    10. Amir Noori & Hossein Bonakdari & Khosro Morovati & Bahram Gharabaghi, 2018. "The optimal dam site selection using a group decision-making method through fuzzy TOPSIS model," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 471-488, December.
    11. Larichev, O. I. & Moshkovich, H. M., 1995. "ZAPROS-LM -- A method and system for ordering multiattribute alternatives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 503-521, May.
    12. Dimitris Bertsimas & Allison O'Hair, 2013. "Learning Preferences Under Noise and Loss Aversion: An Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1190-1199, October.
    13. Yoichiro Fujii & Hajime Murakami & Yutaka Nakamura & Kazuhisa Takemura, 2023. "Multiattribute regret: theory and experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 623-662, November.
    14. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2002. "A survey analysis of service quality for domestic airlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 166-177, May.
    15. Chiara Richiardi & Maria Rita Minciardi & Consolata Siniscalco & Maria Adamo, 2023. "Cumulative Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Anthropogenic Impacts in the Protected Area of the Gran Paradiso National Park in the NW Alps, Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, May.
    16. Palola, Pirta & Bailey, Richard & Wedding, Lisa, 2022. "A novel framework to operationalise value-pluralism in environmental valuation: Environmental value functions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Katarzyna Turoń & Andrzej Kubik & Feng Chen, 2022. "What Car for Car-Sharing? Conventional, Electric, Hybrid or Hydrogen Fleet? Analysis of the Vehicle Selection Criteria for Car-Sharing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    18. William B. Haskell & Wenjie Huang & Huifu Xu, 2018. "Preference Elicitation and Robust Optimization with Multi-Attribute Quasi-Concave Choice Functions," Papers 1805.06632, arXiv.org.
    19. Hauser, John R. & Urban, Glen L., 1982. "Prelaunch forecasting of new consumer durables : ideas on a consumer value - priority model," Working papers 1270-82., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    20. Zachary A. Collier & James H. Lambert & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Preview of the June issue featuring literature reviews of MCDA and articles authored by students," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 121-122, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2738-:d:1055924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.