IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2305-d1047814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupants’ Decision-Making of Their Energy Behaviours in Office Environments: A Case of New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Achini Shanika Weerasinghe

    (School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0745, New Zealand)

  • Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed

    (School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0745, New Zealand)

  • James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi

    (School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0745, New Zealand)

Abstract

Understanding how occupants behave and interact with building systems is vital to energy efficiency in buildings. The building occupants’ behaviours are complex and influenced by diverse factors. A deep understanding of the underlying environmental, contextual, social, and psychological factors is the first step of many in establishing the relationship between the indoor environment and occupants’ behaviours. The current study investigates the influence of occupants’ perceived indoor environmental comfort, the availability of control, and the social-psychological impacts on occupant behaviours in a New Zealand context. The data were collected through online surveys, and 99 office occupants responded. A machine learning technique was applied to identify the critical factors influencing the decision-making of occupant behaviours. Of the occupant behaviours considered in the study, adjusting windows, doors, shades and blinds, and drinking beverages were mostly practised (>70%) while adjusting lighting, personal fans, thermostats/heaters, and computers (40–70%) was moderately practised by occupants. The availability of specific user controls was the main predictor of most occupant behaviours, followed by social-psychological factors such as actual knowledge, perceived knowledge, behavioural interventions, subjective norms, organisational support, personal norms, attitudes, and perceived behavioural control. The indoor environmental parameters such as indoor temperature, indoor air quality, natural light, and inside noise were highlighted as most influential in decision-making for occupant behaviours. Additionally, the demographic factors: gender, work duration, days at work, and permanence/temporariness of workspace, were also impactful. Knowing the complexity of occupants’ decision-making with respect to their behaviours helps building managers use this sensitive information to enhance building energy performance and enable more energy feedback to the occupants to raise their awareness. Such information is helpful for creating an intelligent environmental control system loop with eco-feedback and establishing occupant-centric buildings or features.

Suggested Citation

  • Achini Shanika Weerasinghe & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed & James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi, 2023. "Occupants’ Decision-Making of Their Energy Behaviours in Office Environments: A Case of New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2305-:d:1047814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jia, Mengda & Srinivasan, Ravi S. & Raheem, Adeeba A., 2017. "From occupancy to occupant behavior: An analytical survey of data acquisition technologies, modeling methodologies and simulation coupling mechanisms for building energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 525-540.
    2. Zhang, Yixiang & Wang, Zhaohua & Zhou, Guanghui, 2013. "Antecedents of employee electricity saving behavior in organizations: An empirical study based on norm activation model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1120-1127.
    3. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    4. Xie, Chengyang & Ding, Hongxing & Zhang, Huan & Yuan, Jingfeng & Su, Shu & Tang, Meiling, 2021. "Exploring the psychological mechanism underlying the relationship between organizational interventions and employees’ energy-saving behaviors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Yao, Jian, 2014. "Determining the energy performance of manually controlled solar shades: A stochastic model based co-simulation analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 64-80.
    6. Amasyali, Kadir & El-Gohary, Nora M., 2018. "A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1192-1205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abbasabadi, Narjes & Ashayeri, Mehdi & Azari, Rahman & Stephens, Brent & Heidarinejad, Mohammad, 2019. "An integrated data-driven framework for urban energy use modeling (UEUM)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Tian, Wei & Heo, Yeonsook & de Wilde, Pieter & Li, Zhanyong & Yan, Da & Park, Cheol Soo & Feng, Xiaohang & Augenbroe, Godfried, 2018. "A review of uncertainty analysis in building energy assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 285-301.
    3. Yan, Biao & Yang, Wansheng & He, Fuquan & Zeng, Wenhao, 2023. "Occupant behavior impact in buildings and the artificial intelligence-based techniques and data-driven approach solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. D’Oca, Simona & Hong, Tianzhen & Langevin, Jared, 2018. "The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 731-742.
    5. Salah Bouktif & Ali Ouni & Sanja Lazarova-Molnar, 2022. "Towards a Rigorous Consideration of Occupant Behaviours of Residential Households for Effective Electrical Energy Savings: An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, February.
    6. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Nidhi Singh & Zoran Kalinic & Elena Carvajal-Trujillo, 2021. "Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 133-161, June.
    7. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Jinrong Wu & Su Nguyen & Damminda Alahakoon & Daswin De Silva & Nishan Mills & Prabod Rathnayaka & Harsha Moraliyage & Andrew Jennings, 2024. "A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Energy Baseline Models across Multiple Building Types," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Usunier, Jean-Claude, 1998. "Oral pleasure and expatriate satisfaction: an empirical approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 89-110, February.
    11. Abdul Kadar Muhammad Masum & Md Abul Kalam Azad & Loo-See Beh, 2015. "Determinants of Academics' Job Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from Private Universities in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Sharma, Vivek & Bhat, Dada Ab Rouf, 2020. "An empirical study exploring the relationship among human capital innovation, service innovation, competitive advantage and employee productivity in hospitality services," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14..
    13. Deepak, 2016. "Antecedent Value of Professional Commitment and Job Involvement in Determining Job Satisfaction," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 41(2), pages 154-164, May.
    14. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2004. "Power, organization design and managerial behaviour," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-225.
    15. Marianela Denegri & María Baeza & Natalia Salinas-Oñate & Verónica Peñaloza & Horacio Miranda & Ligia Orellana, 2014. "Materialism in Pedagogy Students in Chile," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 505-521, June.
    16. Terason Sid, 2021. "Predicting Sports Facility Revisit Intentions Based on Experience and Mediating Effects of Perceived Value," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 35-41, September.
    17. Amy Roberts & Gregory S. Ching, 2021. "The Ebb and Flow of Study Abroad: A Comparative Analysis of PRC and International Students in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Tomislav Letnik & Katja Hanžič & Giuseppe Luppino & Matej Mencinger, 2022. "Impact of Logistics Trends on Freight Transport Development in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Zhihui Wang & Liangzhen Nie & Eila Jeronen & Lihua Xu & Meiai Chen, 2023. "Understanding the Environmentally Sustainable Behavior of Chinese University Students as Tourists: An Integrative Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    20. William Kelly & Phillips Cutright & David Hittle, 1976. "Comment on charles F. Hohm’s “social security and fertility: An international perspective”," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(4), pages 581-586, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2305-:d:1047814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.