IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1934-d1041427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spatial Pattern of Deprivations and Inequalities: The Case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Gizachew Berhanu Gelet

    (Ph.D. Program in Urban and Regional Planning, The Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development (EiABC), Addis Ababa University, Lideta, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 518, Ethiopia)

  • Solomon Mulugeta Woldemichael

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia)

  • Ephrem Gebremariam Beyene

    (The Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development (EiABC), Addis Ababa University, Lideta, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 518, Ethiopia)

Abstract

Addis Ababa is a metropolitan area faced with the challenges of Ethiopia’s urbanization, such as poverty, unemployment, informal settlements, an acute housing shortage, and environmental hazards. Yet, the non-practicality of area-based policy using the Multiple Deprivation Index (MDI) exacerbates the polarization of poverty and spatial inequality to create a divided city. The study developed the MDI for 2007 and 2016. The study’s objective was to justify the area-based policy by analyzing the overlaps of deprivations based on the relationship of pertinent indicators and components, the spatial pattern of inequality and deprivations, and the relationship of deprivation with population size and density. The findings of the study were triangulated and validated with the deductive theoretical, empirical, and SDG frameworks to replicate external validity. The research design included both descriptive and correlational methods. The inductively derived pattern using PCA (principal component analysis) and LISA (local spatial association index) of MDI components revealed spatial inequality and poverty polarization. The index of concentrated poverty was revealed by global spatial autocorrelation. The statistical and spatial trend analysis revealed concentrated poverty, especially in the inner-city slums and the peri-urban informal settlements. Most of the findings conformed to deductive theoretical and SDG frameworks, while the analysis of MDI indicators and components revealed additional slum indicators and the relevance of integrating other SDG indicators with SDG 11 for realizing sustainable urbanization. Due to spatial inequality, patterns of concentrated poverty, a large, deprived population, and easing future urbanization challenges, the study rationalized area-based policy for reducing inequality and poverty polarization.

Suggested Citation

  • Gizachew Berhanu Gelet & Solomon Mulugeta Woldemichael & Ephrem Gebremariam Beyene, 2023. "The Spatial Pattern of Deprivations and Inequalities: The Case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-32, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1934-:d:1041427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1934/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1934/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers 070, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Neumark, David & Simpson, Helen, 2015. "Place-Based Policies," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 1197-1287, Elsevier.
    3. Shifa, Muna & Leibbrandt, Murray, 2021. "Spatial Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa," EconStor Preprints 244591, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Mihret Wolde & Leta Sera & Tesfaye Melaku Merra, 2022. "Causal relationship between income inequality and economic growth in Ethiopia," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2087299-208, December.
    5. Katia Vladimirova & David Le Blanc, 2015. "How well are the links between education and other sustainable development goals covered in UN flagship reports? A contribution to the study of the science-policy interface on education in the UN syst," Working Papers 146, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    6. Ruth Lupton & Rebecca Tunstall, 2003. "Is Targeting Deprived Areas an Effective Means to Reach Poor People? An assessment of one rationale for area-based funding programmes," CASE Papers case70, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. Ivan Turok, 2013. "People-based versus place-based policies: The 2009 World Development Report," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(1), pages 3-8, February.
    8. Yeung-Nan Shieh, 2003. "An Early Use of Bid Rent Functions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(4), pages 791-795, April.
    9. Filmer, Deon*Pritchett, Lant, 1998. "Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - or tears : with an application to educational enrollments in states of India," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1994, The World Bank.
    10. repec:bri:cmpowp:13/331 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alonso, José M. & Andrews, Rhys & Jorda, Vanesa, 2019. "Do neighbourhood renewal programs reduce crime rates? Evidence from England," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 51-69.
    2. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour’s Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE Papers case177, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    3. repec:cep:sticas:/177 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour's Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 06, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    5. Lupton, Ruth, 2005. "Changing neighbourhoods? Mapping the geography of poverty and worklessness using the 1991 and 2001 census," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27359, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Felix Richter, 2014. "Winner Picking in Urban Revitalization Policies: Empirical Evidence from Berlin," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1424, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Walker, Ryan & Liddell, Christine & McKenzie, Paul & Morris, Chris, 2013. "Evaluating fuel poverty policy in Northern Ireland using a geographic approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 765-774.
    8. Ruth Lupton & Anne Power, 2004. "What We Know about Neighbourhood Change: A literature review," CASE Reports casereport27, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    9. Smyth, Emer & McCoy, Selina & Kingston, Gillian, 2015. "Learning from the Evaluation of DEIS," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS39, June.
    10. Peter Batey & Peter Brown, 2007. "The Spatial Targeting of Urban Policy Initiatives: A Geodemographic Assessment Tool," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2774-2793, November.
    11. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Fitzgerald, Amanda, 2013. "Labour's record on neighbourhood renewal in England: policy, spending and outcomes 1997-2010," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58086, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Valeria Saiu, 2020. "Evaluating Outwards Regeneration Effects (OREs) in Neighborhood-Based Projects: A Reversal of Perspective and the Proposal for a New Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    13. David Clelland & Carol Hill, 2019. "Deprivation, policy and rurality: The limitations and applications of area-based deprivation indices in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(1), pages 33-50, February.
    14. Tom Sefton, 2004. "A Fair Share of Welfare: Public Spending on Children in England," CASE Reports casereport25, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    15. Sophie Donaldson, 2007. "Contested Governance and Definitions of Need in the Distribution of Funding: Investigating the Regeneration-Funding Paradox and the Role of UK National Lottery Funding in Regeneration," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(2), pages 212-232, April.
    16. Tony Fahey & Michelle Norris & Desmond McCafferty & Eileen Humphreys, 2011. "Combating social disadvantage in social housing estates: the policy implications of a ten year follow up study," Open Access publications 10197/5561, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    17. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2020. "Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 223-248, February.
    18. Angus Deaton & Jean Dreze, 2008. "Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations," Working Papers 1071, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
    19. Oliver Falck & Michael Fritsch & Stephan Heblich & Anne Otto, 2018. "Music in the air: estimating the social return to cultural amenities," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(3), pages 365-391, August.
    20. F. le R. Booysen, 2001. "Non‐Payment Of Services: A Problem Of Ability‐To‐Pay," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(4), pages 674-697, December.
    21. Renuka Sane & Susan Thomas, 2020. "From Participation To Repurchase: Low Income Households And Micro‐insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 87(3), pages 783-814, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1934-:d:1041427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.