IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1531-d1034248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual Characteristics as Enablers of Construction Employees’ Digital Literacy: An Exploration of Leaders’ Opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Sambo Lyson Zulu

    (School of Built Environment, Engineering, and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Northern Terrace, City Campus, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK)

  • Ali M. Saad

    (School of Built Environment, Engineering, and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Northern Terrace, City Campus, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK)

  • Barry Gledson

    (Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK)

Abstract

The shift towards digitalisation has been empowering growth in the construction industry, especially in the past decade. Construction stakeholders are offered myriad benefits by embracing digital advancements to achieve efficiency. However, the exploitation of digital opportunities is bounded by the need for a practitioner skillset that aligns with the digital era, a requirement that has been described as difficult to meet and justified by the low degree of digital literacy among construction employees. This paper reports findings from interviews with 19 leaders and decision makers in the construction sector to reveal the indicators that can predict construction employees’ digital literacy. Such an approach offers a comprehensive exploration of the likelihood of employees’ digital literacy through socially oriented characteristics. Overall, 19 individual characteristics emerged from the thematic analysis and highlight the critical connection between social behaviour and digital literacy. The findings of this paper are timely and important for those businesses assessing their employees’ willingness and maturity with regard to technological change through social and behavioural information. The qualitative approach led to the development of a conceptual framework that can explain the dynamics needed to assess employees’ digital literacy in construction organisations. This study, therefore, reveals the effectiveness of predicting employees’ readiness to shine in the digital era by shedding light on their digital literacy through examinations of individual characteristics in a construction workplace. This paper is among the first to encourage research efforts that take into account the importance of studying social and psychological complexities, which are subject areas that are limited in recent construction literature. As such, it is of value to employers wishing to embed greater digitalisation in their firms, as well as researchers in this domain and policymakers looking to encourage greater digital transformations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sambo Lyson Zulu & Ali M. Saad & Barry Gledson, 2023. "Individual Characteristics as Enablers of Construction Employees’ Digital Literacy: An Exploration of Leaders’ Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1531-:d:1034248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Müller, Julian Marius & Buliga, Oana & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2018. "Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 2-17.
    2. Haq, Muhibul & Johanson, Martin & Davies, Julie & Dana, Léo-Paul & Budhathoki, Tribikram, 2021. "Compassionate customer service in ethnic minority microbusinesses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 279-290.
    3. Tom Smith, 2018. "From the Editor," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(1), pages 5-10, March.
    4. Meifang Yao & Dan Ye & Liyi Zhao, 2022. "The relationship between inbound open innovation and the innovative use of information technology by individuals in teams of start‐ups," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 503-515, May.
    5. Laura Siepmann & Kimberly A. Nicholas, 2018. "German Winegrowers’ Motives and Barriers to Convert to Organic Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Sambo Lyson Zulu & Farzad Khosrowshahi, 2021. "A taxonomy of digital leadership in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 565-578, July.
    7. Rob Shields & Kevin West, 2003. "Innovation in clean-room construction: a case study of co-operation between firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 337-344.
    8. Marco Casini, 2022. "Extended Reality for Smart Building Operation and Maintenance: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-36, May.
    9. Francesco Polese & Antonio Botti & Mara Grimaldi & Antonella Monda & Massimiliano Vesci, 2018. "Social Innovation in Smart Tourism Ecosystems: How Technology and Institutions Shape Sustainable Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Nelly Oelze & Tim Gruchmann & Marcus Brandenburg, 2020. "Motivating Factors for Implementing Apparel Certification Schemes—A Sustainable Supply Chain Management Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Bartosz Orzeł & Radosław Wolniak, 2022. "Digitization in the Design and Construction Industry—Remote Work in the Context of Sustainability: A Study from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Thomas Diefenbach, 2009. "Are case studies more than sophisticated storytelling?: Methodological problems of qualitative empirical research mainly based on semi-structured interviews," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(6), pages 875-894, November.
    13. Jelena Budak & Edo Rajh & Sunčana Slijepčević & Bruno Škrinjarić, 2021. "Conceptual Research Framework of Consumer Resilience to Privacy Violation Online," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Shojaei, Reyhaneh S. & Burgess, Gemma, 2022. "Non-technical inhibitors: Exploring the adoption of digital innovation in the UK construction industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    15. Silvia Lorincová & Miloš Hitka & Peter Štarchoň & Katarína Stachová, 2018. "Strategic Instrument for Sustainability of Human Resource Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Using Management Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    16. DeVoe, Sanford E. & Iyengar, Sheena S., 2004. "Managers' theories of subordinates: A cross-cultural examination of manager perceptions of motivation and appraisal of performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 47-61, January.
    17. Oesterreich, Thuy Duong & Teuteberg, Frank, 2019. "Behind the scenes: Understanding the socio-technical barriers to BIM adoption through the theoretical lens of information systems research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 413-431.
    18. Peter Jones & Martin Wynn, 2021. "The Leading Digital Technology Companies and Their Approach to Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Natalia Vershinina & Peter Rodgers, 2020. "Symbolic capital within the lived experiences of Eastern European migrants: a gendered perspective," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7-8), pages 590-605, August.
    20. Karen Manley & Steve Mcfallan, 2006. "Exploring the drivers of firm-level innovation in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 911-920.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sambo Lyson Zulu & Ali M. Saad, 2023. "A Sensemaking Perspective of Digitalisation in Construction Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nault, Kelly A. & Sezer, Ovul & Klein, Nadav, 2023. "It’s the journey, not just the destination: Conveying interpersonal warmth in written introductions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Ghadimi, Pezhman & Donnelly, Oisin & Sar, Kubra & Wang, Chao & Azadnia, Amir Hossein, 2022. "The successful implementation of industry 4.0 in manufacturing: An analysis and prioritization of risks in Irish industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Robert Heckert, 2019. "Challenges for a Multiple Identity Organization: A Case Study of the Dutch Blood Supply Foundation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 101-119, August.
    4. Lord, Robert G. & Gatti, Paola & Chui, Susanna L.M., 2016. "Social-cognitive, relational, and identity-based approaches to leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 119-134.
    5. Aleksandra Kowalska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Milena Bieniek & Monika Ratajczyk & Louise Manning, 2023. "Declared non-buyers of organic food: A study of young British and Polish consumer profiles," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 28-50.
    6. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Pasquale Del Vecchio & Gioconda Mele & Valentina Ndou & Giustina Secundo, 2018. "Open Innovation and Social Big Data for Sustainability: Evidence from the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Guilian Wang & Liyan Zhang & Jing Guo, 2022. "Driving Factors and Mechanisms of AMT Application Levels for Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises: Based on Programmatic Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Jol Stoffers & Beatrice van der Heijden & Ilse Schrijver, 2019. "Towards a Sustainable Model of Innovative Work Behaviors’ Enhancement: The Mediating Role of Employability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Jingxiao Zhang & Haiyan Xie & Hui Li & Rose Timothy & Si Pu & Quanxue Deng & Weixing Jin, 2018. "Integrated Framework of Growth Management for Identification of Service Innovation Levels and Priorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-33, September.
    11. Emese Tokarcikova & Eva Malichova & Alzbeta Kucharcíkova & Maria Durisova, 2020. "Importance of Technical and Business Skills for Future IT Professionals," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(54), pages 567-567, April.
    12. Turgut Karakose & Ibrahim Kocabas & Ramazan Yirci & Stamatios Papadakis & Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir & Murat Demirkol, 2022. "The Development and Evolution of Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Mapping Approach-Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Naama Teschner & Daniel E. Orenstein, 2022. "A transdisciplinary study of agroecological niches: understanding sustainability transitions in vineyards," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 33-45, March.
    14. Nagamani Subramanian & M. Suresh, 2022. "Social Sustainability Factors Influencing the Implementation of Sustainable HRM in Manufacturing SMEs," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 469-507, December.
    15. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Nadja Thoma & Phil C. Langer, 2022. "Educational Transitions in War and Refugee Contexts: Youth Biographies in Afghanistan and Austria," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 302-312.
    17. Bartoloni, Sara & Calò, Ernesto & Marinelli, Luca & Pascucci, Federica & Dezi, Luca & Carayannis, Elias & Revel, Gian Marco & Gregori, Gian Luca, 2022. "Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new Quintuple Helix - Design Thinking approach to technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna, 2020. "Bridging Sustainable Human Resource Management and Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Pai, Jieun & DeVoe, Sanford E. & Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2020. "How income and the economic evaluation of time affect who we socialize with outside of work," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 158-175.
    20. Rudolf R. Sinkovics & Eva A. Alfoldi, 2012. "Progressive Focusing and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 817-845, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1531-:d:1034248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.