IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15656-d1274802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Teaching and Learning: Modern Trends and Open Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim Ahmed Ghashim

    (Deanship of E-Learning and Information Technology, Jazan University, Alburj Campus, Jazan 82812, Gizan, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhammad Arshad

    (School of Informatics and Cybersecurity, Technological University Dublin, Blanchardstown, D15 YV78 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

The effect of technology has caused many institutions to intend to change their approach to teaching and learning, resulting in the current model of teaching and learning being an active collaborative and self-directed one. The connection between education and technology has received attention as part of educational policy and practice. Debatable topics like how to use technology in the classroom have therefore punctuated complaints about declining educational standards, unemployed learners, duplicate curricula, and archaic institutional structure. In the framework of information and communication technologies and societal growth, the Internet of Things (IoT) is asserting its vital position. Institutions may improve learning outcomes with the use of the Internet of Things by offering enhanced learning experiences, increasing operational effectiveness, and collecting real-time, actionable insight into student performance. The current state of the Internet of Educational Things (IoET) is examined from several educational perspectives in this article; a few of them are highlighted, and both of their established and potential educational benefits are discussed. Additionally, it provides in-depth discussions on current issues and problems for the IoET from a variety of approaches. The investigation performs a bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer to focus on peer-reviewed research articles published in well-known publications databases over the past eight (8) years. The findings of this study should also act as a strong incentive for universities and colleges around the world to use IoT-based teaching and learning technology for improved academic achievement.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim Ahmed Ghashim & Muhammad Arshad, 2023. "Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Teaching and Learning: Modern Trends and Open Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15656-:d:1274802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmad Almufarreh & Muhammad Arshad, 2023. "Promising Emerging Technologies for Teaching and Learning: Recent Developments and Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Michael Gusenbauer, 2019. "Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 177-214, January.
    3. David Banks, 2018. "Thoughts on Publishing the Research Article over the Centuries," Publications, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Almufarreh & Muhammad Arshad, 2023. "Promising Emerging Technologies for Teaching and Learning: Recent Developments and Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Norma Salgado-Orellana & Emilio Berrocal de-Luna & Calixto Gutiérrez-Braojos, 2021. "A scientometric study of doctoral theses on the Roma in the Iberian Peninsula during the 1977–2018 period," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 437-458, January.
    3. Simone Belli & Carlos Gonzalo-Penela, 2020. "Science, research, and innovation infospheres in Google results of the Ibero-American countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(2), pages 635-653, May.
    4. Katia A. Figueroa-Rodríguez & Francisco Hernández-Rosas & Benjamín Figueroa-Sandoval & Joel Velasco-Velasco & Noé Aguilar Rivera, 2019. "What Has Been the Focus of Sugarcane Research? A Bibliometric Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Mohamed Boufarss & Mikael Laakso, 2020. "Open Sesame? Open access priorities, incentives, and policies among higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1553-1577, August.
    6. Hanna Obracht-Prondzyńska & Ewa Duda & Helena Anacka & Jolanta Kowal, 2022. "Greencoin as an AI-Based Solution Shaping Climate Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Lim, Weng Marc & Rasul, Tareq, 2022. "Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 325-342.
    8. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Pereira, Vijay & Islam, Nazrul & Giudice, Manlio Del & Choudrie, Jyoti, 2022. "Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Jussi T. S. Heikkila, 2022. "Journal of Economic Literature codes classification system (JEL)," Papers 2207.06076, arXiv.org.
    10. Sulistyodewi Nur Wiyono & Yosini Deliana & Eliana Wulandari & Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman, 2022. "The Embodiment of Muslim Intention Elements in Buying Halal Food Products: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Aman Kumar & Binil Starly, 2022. "“FabNER”: information extraction from manufacturing process science domain literature using named entity recognition," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 2393-2407, December.
    12. Vivek Kumar Singh & Satya Swarup Srichandan & Hiran H. Lathabai, 2022. "ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1515-1542, March.
    13. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    14. Ruben Tessmann & Ralf Elbert, 2022. "Multi-sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 829-872, June.
    15. Charlotte S. Diepolder & Holger Weitzel & Johannes Huwer, 2021. "Competence Frameworks of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    16. Hayrol Azril Mohamed Shaffril & Samsul Farid Samsuddin & Asnarulkhadi Abu Samah, 2021. "The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1319-1346, August.
    17. Andreas Kuckertz & Joern Block, 2021. "Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 519-524, July.
    18. Kyle J. Burghardt & Bradley H. Howlett & Audrey S. Khoury & Stephanie M. Fern & Paul R. Burghardt, 2020. "Three Commonly Utilized Scholarly Databases and a Social Network Site Provide Different, But Related, Metrics of Pharmacy Faculty Publication," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, April.
    19. Maik Hesse & Timm Teubner, 2020. "Reputation portability – quo vadis?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 331-349, June.
    20. Ming-yueh Tsay & Yu-wei Tseng & Tai-luan Wu, 2019. "Comprehensiveness and uniqueness of commercial databases and open access systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1323-1338, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15656-:d:1274802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.