IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12633-d1221509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the National Identity Education Intentions of Pre-Service Teachers: Evidence from PLS-SEM and fsQCA

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Zhang

    (School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiannan Du

    (Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Huiji Yue

    (School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Gui’an Li

    (School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Dian Zhang

    (College of Physical Science and Technology, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121000, China)

Abstract

National identity education is a form of education that fosters a stable sense of national identity among citizens and plays a crucial role in the sustainable development of the country. However, with the deepening of economic globalisation and cultural pluralism, pre-service teachers, in their dual roles as school students and prospective teachers, have encountered challenges in practicing their intention to implement national identity education. This study constructed a model of influencing pre-service teachers’ intention to implement national identity education based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the cognitive evaluation theory (CET) with the aim of explaining and analysing the development path of pre-service teachers’ educational intentions. The model was validated using PLS-SEM and fsQCA on data from 280 pre-service teachers in teacher training colleges in northern China. The PLS-SEM results indicated that subjective norms, relatedness need, and study resources directly and positively influenced pre-service teachers’ educational intentions, and study resources could also indirectly influence educational intentions through subjective norms and a need for relatedness. The fsQCA results indicated that a single variable was unable to predict and explain educational intentions. A total of five ways of influencing educational intentions emerged from the group analysis. Based on the pre-service teachers’ propensity to demand learning resources and their competence, pre-service teachers were categorised into four types—basic development pathway, internally driven pathway, competence-driven pathway and resource-supported pathway—and recommendations were made according to the degree of reliance on resources of different types of pre-service teachers as a way of providing theoretical and data support for the sustainable development of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Zhang & Jiannan Du & Huiji Yue & Gui’an Li & Dian Zhang, 2023. "Study on the National Identity Education Intentions of Pre-Service Teachers: Evidence from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12633-:d:1221509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12633/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12633/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonie Huddy & Nadia Khatib, 2007. "American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(1), pages 63-77, January.
    2. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Roberta Riverso & Carmela Altamura & Francesco La Barbera, 2023. "Consumer Intention to Buy Electric Cars: Integrating Uncertainty in the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, May.
    5. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    6. Farrah Dina Yusop & Akhmad Habibi & Rafiza Abdul Razak, 2021. "Factors Affecting Indonesian Preservice Teachers’ Use of ICT During Teaching Practices Through Theory of Planned Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    7. Siyuan Miao & Jaehoon Rhee & In Jun, 2020. "How Much Does Extrinsic Motivation or Intrinsic Motivation Affect Job Engagement or Turnover Intention? A Comparison Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Zhenjie Yuan & Yulin Xie & Jun (Justin) Li & Jie Li & Rong Yang, 2022. "Learning to Succeed? Interplay between Ethnic Identity, National Identity, and Students’ Perception on Social Mobility in a Xinjiang Class School of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Ching Sing Chai & Thomas K. F. Chiu & Xingwei Wang & Feng Jiang & Xiao-Fan Lin, 2022. "Modeling Chinese Secondary School Students’ Behavioral Intentions to Learn Artificial Intelligence with the Theory of Planned Behavior and Self-Determination Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zaitul Zaitul & Novianti Neva & Ilona Desi, 2022. "Village-Based Tourism Performance: Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intention," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 36-43, June.
    2. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    3. Maria Rodrigues & João F. Proença & Rita Macedo, 2023. "Determinants of the Purchase of Secondhand Products: An Approach by the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Anca-Otilia Dodescu & Elena-Aurelia Botezat & Alexandru Constăngioară & Ioana-Crina Pop-Cohuţ, 2021. "A Partial Least-Square Mediation Analysis of the Contribution of Cross-Campus Entrepreneurship Education to Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Farzana Quoquab & Jihad Mohammad, 2020. "Cognitive, Affective and Conative Domains of Sustainable Consumption: Scale Development and Validation Using Confirmatory Composite Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Carsten Erfgen & Henrik Sattler & Isabel Victoria Villeda, 2016. "Effects of Celebrity Endorsers for Multiple Brands on Attitudes and Purchase Intentions," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 17(1), pages 49-67, April.
    8. Wayne H. Stewart Jr. & Ruth C. May & Donna E. Ledgerwood, 2015. "Do You Know What I Know? Intent to Share Knowledge in the US and Ukraine," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 737-773, December.
    9. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia & Araújo, Cristiano Mineiro Branco de, 2014. "Luxury values and experience as drivers for consumers to recommend and pay more," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 394-400.
    10. Smith, Kenneth J. & Emerson, David J. & Mauldin, Shawn, 2021. "Online cheating at the intersection of the dark triad and fraud diamond," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    11. Arumugam Seetharaman & Saurabh Singhal & Pankaj Galdhar & John Rudolph Raj & A. S. Saravanan, 2016. "Customers’ Expectations for Next Generation Internet Banking," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Kuen-Hung Tsai & Hui-Chen Chang & Chen-Yi Peng, 2016. "Extending the link between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: a moderated mediation model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 445-463, June.
    13. Saari, Ulla A. & Damberg, Svenja & Frömbling, Lena & Ringle, Christian M., 2021. "Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Brigitta Plasek & Zoltán Lakner & Katalin Badak-Kerti & Anikó Kovács & Ágoston Temesi, 2021. "Perceived Consequences: General or Specific? The Case of Palm Oil-Free Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Daan Kabel & Mattias Elg & Erik Sundin, 2021. "Factors Influencing Sustainable Purchasing Behaviour of Remanufactured Robotic Lawn Mowers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Bircan Arslannur & Ahmet Tortum, 2023. "Public Transport Modeling for Commuting in Cities with Different Development Levels Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, August.
    17. Goo Chuan-Chiew & Magdalene Ang Chooi Hwa & Goi Mei Teh, 2018. "Work Intensification and Turnover Intention in Academia: The Mediating Role of Work-Life Balance," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(5), pages 188-196, May.
    18. Hye-Ran Eun & Jong-Tae Park & Jong-Hwa Jang, 2022. "Factors Related to the Intention to Use Dental Care by Industrial Workers Due to COVID-19: Application of Anderson Model and Planned Behavior Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Giovanni Pino & Pierluigi Toma & Cristian Rizzo & Pier Paolo Miglietta & Alessandro M. Peluso & Gianluigi Guido, 2017. "Determinants of Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Water Saving Measures: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Ting Chi & Anastasia Frattali & Hang Liu & Yini Chen, 2023. "Regenerated Cellulose Fibers (RCFs) for Future Apparel Sustainability: Insights from the U.S. Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12633-:d:1221509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.