IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10720-d1189125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Spatial Structure and Drivers of Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency in Belt and Road Initiative Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Qin Shu

    (College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.)

  • Yang Su

    (College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.)

  • Hong Li

    (College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Feng Li

    (College of Business Administration, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)

  • Yunjie Zhao

    (College of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Chen Du

    (College of Information Engineering, Xinjiang Institute of Engineering, Urumqi 830023, China)

Abstract

Agricultural carbon emissions are one of the major causes of global climate change. As some of the world’s largest agricultural producers and consumers, countries along the route of the Belt and Road initiative produce significant agricultural carbon emissions. An in-depth study on the efficiency of agricultural carbon emissions in countries along the route can help countries reduce environmental load while improving agricultural production, optimizing resource use, improving agricultural production efficiency, and achieving sustainable development goals, which is significant for global climate change mitigation. Based on the relational data and network perspective, this paper takes the agricultural carbon emission efficiency of 34 countries along the route of the Belt and Road Initiative from 1995 to 2020 as the research object. It integrates the social network analysis method and other methods to realize the expansion of agricultural carbon emission efficiency in the research method. The study shows that (1) agricultural carbon emission efficiency has more room for improvement and presents complex spatially linked network characteristics; (2) the spatial correlation network of agricultural carbon emission efficiency is relatively well connected, and there is a general spatial correlation and spatial spillover effect among countries; and (3) similar differences in the proportion of primary industries and differences in informatization levels help establish spatial correlations between regions and produce spatial spillover effects. It is imperative to change global economic growth, social development, and lifestyles through green development. This study is conducive to the international community’s formulation of differentiated agricultural carbon emission reduction support mechanisms for different countries to help the countries realize the transformation of agriculture and even overall economic development as soon as possible. At the same time, accelerating the pace of emission reduction and reducing the negative impact of agricultural carbon emissions are conducive to better responding to the challenges posed by global climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin Shu & Yang Su & Hong Li & Feng Li & Yunjie Zhao & Chen Du, 2023. "Study on the Spatial Structure and Drivers of Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency in Belt and Road Initiative Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10720-:d:1189125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10720/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10720/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenxin Liu & Ruifan Xu & Yue Deng & Weinan Lu & Boyang Zhou & Minjuan Zhao, 2021. "Dynamic Relationships, Regional Differences, and Driving Mechanisms between Economic Development and Carbon Emissions from the Farming Industry: Empirical Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Wise, Marshall & Dooley, James & Luckow, Patrick & Calvin, Katherine & Kyle, Page, 2014. "Agriculture, land use, energy and carbon emission impacts of global biofuel mandates to mid-century," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 763-773.
    3. Han, Lei & Han, Botang & Shi, Xunpeng & Su, Bin & Lv, Xin & Lei, Xiao, 2018. "Energy efficiency convergence across countries in the context of China’s Belt and Road initiative," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 112-122.
    4. Shi, Qiaoling & Zhao, Yuhuan & Qian, Zhiling & Zheng, Lu & Wang, Song, 2022. "Global value chains participation and carbon emissions: Evidence from Belt and Road countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    5. Lu, Qinli & Fang, Kai & Heijungs, Reinout & Feng, Kuishuang & Li, Jiashuo & Wen, Qi & Li, Yanmei & Huang, Xianjin, 2020. "Imbalance and drivers of carbon emissions embodied in trade along the Belt and Road Initiative," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    6. Li, Wenqing & Qiao, Yuanbo & Li, Xiao & Wang, Yutao, 2022. "Energy consumption, pollution haven hypothesis, and Environmental Kuznets Curve: Examining the environment–economy link in belt and road initiative countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    7. Dong, Gang & Mao, Xianqiang & Zhou, Ji & Zeng, An, 2013. "Carbon footprint accounting and dynamics and the driving forces of agricultural production in Zhejiang Province, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 38-47.
    8. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    9. Wang, Xin & Yang, Jianxun & Zhou, Qi & Liu, Miaomiao & Bi, Jun, 2022. "Mapping the exchange between embodied economic benefits and CO2 emissions among Belt and Road Initiative countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanmei Li & Xiushan Bai, 2022. "How Can China and the Belt and Road Initiative Countries Work Together Responding to Climate Change: A Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Economic Spillover Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Bin Yang & Zhanqi Wang & Bo Zhang & Di Zhang, 2020. "Allocation Efficiency, Influencing Factors and Optimization Path of Rural Land Resources: A Case Study in Fang County of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Wei Yang & Zudi Lu & Di Wang & Yanmin Shao & Jinfeng Shi, 2020. "Sustainable Evolution of China’s Regional Energy Efficiency Based on a Weighted SBM Model with Energy Substitutability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Lin Zhu & Xiaoming Li & Yao Huang & Fangyuan Liu & Chengji Yang & Dongyang Li & Hongpeng Bai, 2023. "Digital Technology and Green Development in Manufacturing: Evidence from China and 20 Other Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Fan, Qiufang & Liu, Jintao & Zhang, Tao & Liu, Haomin, 2022. "An Evaluation of the Efficiency of China’s green investment in the “Belt and Road” countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 496-511.
    6. Li Xie & Chunlin Chen & Yihua Yu, 2019. "Dynamic Assessment of Environmental Efficiency in Chinese Industry: A Multiple DEA Model with a Gini Criterion Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Zhao, Nan & Liu, Xiaojie & Pan, Changfeng & Wang, Chenyang, 2021. "The performance of green innovation: From an efficiency perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Xingle Long & Chuanwang Sun & Chao Wu & Bin Chen & Kofi Agyenim Boateng, 2020. "Green innovation efficiency across China’s 30 provinces: estimate, comparison, and convergence," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1243-1260, October.
    9. Shichun Xu & Yiwen Li & Yuan Tao & Yan Wang & Yunfan Li, 2020. "Regional Differences in the Spatial Characteristics and Dynamic Convergence of Environmental Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Zhiyu Fang & Ling Jiang & Zhong Fang, 2021. "Does Economic Policy Intervention Inhibit the Efficiency of China’s Green Energy Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Xiao, Zhaohua & Du, Limin & Wang, Zheng, 2023. "The Belt, the Road, and the carbon emissions in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Wang, Xipan & Song, Junnian & Duan, Haiyan & Wang, Xian'en, 2021. "Coupling between energy efficiency and industrial structure: An urban agglomeration case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Ying Li & Yung-ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "Energy and Environmental Efficiency in Different Chinese Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Lin, Zekun & Meng, Fanxin & Wang, Dongfang & Liao, Danqi & Sun, Yutong & Hou, Jiaqi & Liu, Gengyuan & Giannetti, Biagio Fernando & Agostinho, Feni & Almeida, Cecília M.V.B., 2023. "Unfolding carbon inequality across Belt and Road Initiative countries and regions under a global trade network," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 482(C).
    15. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    16. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499, April.
    17. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.
    18. Ke Zhang & Xingwei Wang, 2021. "Pollution Haven Hypothesis of Global CO 2 , SO 2 , NO x —Evidence from 43 Economies and 56 Sectors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-27, June.
    19. Kristiaan Kerstens & Jafar Sadeghi & Ignace Van de Woestyne, 2020. "Plant capacity notions in a non-parametric framework: a brief review and new graph or non-oriented plant capacities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 837-860, May.
    20. Ashrafi, Ali & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Lee, Lai Soon & Lee, Chew Ging, 2013. "The efficiency of the hotel industry in Singapore," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 31-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10720-:d:1189125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.