IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7868-d1144482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Public Capital Affect Enterprise Technological Innovation Based on Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Shanshan Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Feng Deng

    (School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Baosheng Yuan

    (School of Economics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China)

Abstract

Public capital is an important force for promoting industrial agglomeration and enterprise technological innovation, and enterprise technological innovation is the core element in promoting green economic growth. To further reveal the influence mechanism of public capital on enterprise technological innovation, based on the data of A-share listed companies in China from 2007 to 2020, this paper uses the nonlinear moderating effect model and the intermediating effect model to verify the nonlinear influence and transmission mechanism of public capital on enterprise technological innovation. This paper discusses the influence and mechanism of public capital on enterprise innovation from the perspective of industrial agglomeration. The study finds that public capital has a significant role in promoting enterprise technological innovation. Moreover, economic public capital plays a greater role in promoting enterprise technological innovation than social public capital. Further analysis shows that the innovation effect of public capital is nonlinearly regulated by industrial agglomeration. In the initial stage of industrial agglomeration, the higher the degree of industrial agglomeration, the weaker the innovation effect of public capital; however, in the advanced stage of industrial agglomeration, the higher the degree of industrial agglomeration, the stronger the innovation effect of public capital. The nonlinear effect is realized by affecting the profits of enterprises. From enterprise heterogeneity, public capital has a significant role in promoting the technological innovation of non-state-owned enterprises but has no significant impact on the technological innovation of state-owned enterprises; public capital has a significant positive effect on the technological innovation of mid- and high-end technology enterprises, while its impact on the technological innovation of low-end technology enterprises is not significant. From the type of innovation output, public capital has a significant role in promoting enterprise green technology innovation, and the role of public capital in promoting enterprise green invention patents is greater than that of green utility model patents. This study provides a theoretical basis for government public capital investment decisions and empirical evidence for the sustainable development of enterprise technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanshan Liu & Feng Deng & Baosheng Yuan, 2023. "How Does Public Capital Affect Enterprise Technological Innovation Based on Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7868-:d:1144482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7868/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7868/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shigeaki Ogibayashi & Kosei Takashima, 2017. "Influence of Inefficiency in Government Expenditure on the Multiplier of Public Investment," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(4), pages 549-577, December.
    2. John A. Tatom, 1991. "Public capital and private sector performance," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue May, pages 3-15.
    3. Li, Guangpei & Wang, Xiaoyu & Su, Shibin & Su, Yuan, 2019. "How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Gerhard Glomm & B. Ravikumar, 1998. "Opting out of publicly provided services: A majority voting result," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 15(2), pages 187-199.
    5. Blankenau, William F. & Simpson, Nicole B., 2004. "Public education expenditures and growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 583-605, April.
    6. Agenor, Pierre-Richard & Nabli, Mustapha K. & Yousef, Tarik M., 2005. "Public infrastructure and private investment in the Middle East and North Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3661, The World Bank.
    7. Alicia H. Munnell, 1990. "How does public infrastructure affect regional economic performance?," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 34, pages 69-112.
    8. Pan, Jiadong & Lin, Gaobang & Xiao, Wen, 2022. "The heterogeneity of innovation, government R&D support and enterprise innovation performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Lili Jia & Eunyoung Nam & Dongphil Chun, 2021. "Impact of Chinese Government Subsidies on Enterprise Innovation: Based on a Three-Dimensional Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Blind, Knut & Grupp, Hariolf, 1999. "Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 451-468, June.
    11. Yuxi Chen & Mengting Zhang & Chencheng Wang & Xin Lin & Zhijie Zhang, 2023. "High-Tech Industrial Agglomeration, Government Intervention and Regional Energy Efficiency: Based on the Perspective of the Spatial Spillover Effect and Panel Threshold Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, April.
    12. Qi Zhong & Tang Tang, 2018. "Impact of Government Intervention on Industrial Cluster Innovation Network in Developing Countries," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(14), pages 3351-3365, November.
    13. Fraga, Jefferson Souza & Resende, Marco Flávio da Cunha, 2022. "Infrastructure, conventions and private investment: An empirical investigation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 351-361.
    14. Arrow, Kenneth J & Kurz, Mordecai, 1970. "Optimal Growth with Irreversible Investment in a Ramsey Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(2), pages 331-344, March.
    15. Jun Koo, 2007. "Determinants of Localized Technology Spillovers: Role of Regional and Industrial Attributes," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 995-1011.
    16. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    17. John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2002. "The Built‐in Flexibility of Income and Consumption Taxes," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 509-532, September.
    18. Jacques†François Thisse, 2018. "Human Capital and Agglomeration Economies in Urban Development," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 56(2), pages 117-139, June.
    19. Turnovsky, Stephen J. & Fisher, Walter H., 1995. "The composition of government expenditure and its consequences for macroeconomic performance," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 747-786, May.
    20. Lenihan, Helena & McGuirk, Helen & Murphy, Kevin R., 2019. "Driving innovation: Public policy and human capital," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    21. Yuncai Liu & Nengsheng Luo & Shusheng Wu, 2019. "Nonlinear Effects of Environmental Regulation on Environmental Pollution," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-10, March.
    22. Jingjing Zeng & Dingjie Liu & Hongtao Yi, 2019. "Agglomeration, Structural Embeddedness, and Enterprises’ Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study of Wuhan Biopharmaceutical Industrial Cluster Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    23. Creedy, John & Gemmell, Norman, 2002. "The Built-In Flexibility of Income and Consumption Taxes," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 509-532, September.
    24. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas & Schwartz, Amy Ellen, 1995. "Infrastructure in a structural model of economic growth," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 131-151, April.
    25. Li, Xing & Guo, Yue & Hou, Jiani & Liu, Jun, 2021. "Human Capital Allocation and Enterprise Innovation Performance: An Example of China's Knowledge-Intensive Service Industry," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    26. Lynde, Catherine & Richmond, J, 1993. "Public Capital and Long-Run Costs in U.K. Manufacturing," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 103(419), pages 880-893, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raffaello Bronzini & Paolo Piselli, 2006. "Determinants of long-run regional productivity: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 597, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    2. William F. Fox & Sanela Porca, 2001. "Investing in Rural Infrastructure," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 24(1), pages 103-133, January.
    3. Nikos Benos & Nikolaos Mylonidis & Stefania Zotou, 2017. "Estimating production functions for the US states: the role of public and human capital," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 691-721, March.
    4. Silvia Bertarelli, 2006. "Public capital and growth," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 361-398.
    5. Fabienne Dascher-Preising & Alfred Greiner, 2024. "Human Capital Formation With Heterogeneous Agents, Sustainable Debt Policies and Growth: Who Benefits from Fiscal Policy Rules?," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 25(1), pages 175-212, May.
    6. Poot, Jacques, 1999. "A meta-analytic study of the role of government in long-run economic growth," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa171, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Konstantinos Angelopoulos & Jim Malley & Apostolis Philippopoulos, 2007. "Public Education Expenditure, Growth and Welfare," CESifo Working Paper Series 2037, CESifo.
    8. Sturm, Jan Egbert & de Haan, Jakob, 1995. "Is public expenditure really productive?: New evidence for the USA and The Netherlands," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 60-72, January.
    9. Nigel Spence & Antonis Rovolis, 2002. "Duality theory and cost function analysis in a regional context: the impact of public infrastructure capital in the Greek regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 36(1), pages 55-78.
    10. Pedro R. D. Bom & Jenny Ligthart, 2008. "How Productive is Public Capital? A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 2206, CESifo.
    11. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas & Lovely, Mary E., 1996. "Scale economies, returns to variety, and the productivity of public infrastructure," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 105-123, April.
    12. Dorothée Boccanfuso & Marcelin Joanis & Mathieu Paquet & Luc Savard, 2015. "Impact de productivité des infrastructures: Une application au Québec," Cahiers de recherche 15-06, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    13. Pedro R.D. Bom & Jenny E. Ligthart, 2014. "What Have We Learned From Three Decades Of Research On The Productivity Of Public Capital?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 889-916, December.
    14. Pierre-Richard Agénor, 2012. "Infrastructure, Public Education And Growth With Congestion Costs," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 449-469, October.
    15. Barabas, György & Kitlinski, Tobias & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schmidt, Torsten & Siemers, Lars-H. & Brilon, Werner, 2010. "Verkehrsinfrastrukturinvestitionen: Wachstumsaspekte im Rahmen einer gestaltenden Finanzpolitik. Endbericht - Januar 2010. Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums der Finanzen. Projektnumm," RWI Projektberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, number 72601.
    16. Federici, Andrea, 2018. "Il rapporto tra capitale pubblico e altre variabili macroeconomiche: analisi della letteratura [The relationship between public capital and other macroeconomic variable: a literature review]," MPRA Paper 88515, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Holmgren, Johan & Merkel, Axel, 2017. "Much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis of the relationship between infrastructure and economic growth," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 13-26.
    18. Alfredo M. Pereira & Jorge M. Andraz, 2013. "On The Economic Effects Of Public Infrastructure Investment: A Survey Of The International Evidence," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 1-37, December.
    19. Mr. Philip R. Gerson, 1998. "The Impact of Fiscal Policy Variables on Output Growth," IMF Working Papers 1998/001, International Monetary Fund.
    20. José Luis Torres Chacon, 2015. "Introduction to Dynamic Macroeconomic General Equilibrium Models," Vernon Press Titles in Economics, Vernon Art and Science Inc, edition 2, number 54, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7868-:d:1144482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.