IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p417-d1016169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Introversion-Extraversion Personality Traits on Knowledge-Sharing Intention in Online Health Communities: A Multi-Group Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mian Lv

    (School of Foreign Languages, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Yongbo Sun

    (Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Binbin Shi

    (Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of introversion-extraversion personality traits on the knowledge-sharing intention of online health communities (OHCs) using personality trait theory and social capital theory. This study investigates two types of users in OHCs—doctors and patients—and compares and analyses the knowledge-sharing paths of these two types of users. The results show that extraversion personality, interaction, and reciprocity positively influence the physicians’ and patients’ knowledge-sharing intention; for both types of users, interaction partially mediates between extraversion personality and knowledge-sharing intention, and reciprocity partially mediates between interaction and knowledge-sharing intention. Comparative analyses show that the physicians’ introversion-extraversion personality traits have stronger positive effects on interaction, and interaction has stronger positive effects on trust and reciprocity than patients, the physicians’ trust and reciprocity have stronger positive effects on knowledge-sharing intention than patients, and the physicians’ introversion personality traits have stronger positive effects on knowledge-sharing intentions than patients. This study enriches the theory of user knowledge-sharing in OHCs while advancing the managers’ understanding of what motivates users’ knowledge-sharing intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Mian Lv & Yongbo Sun & Binbin Shi, 2022. "Impact of Introversion-Extraversion Personality Traits on Knowledge-Sharing Intention in Online Health Communities: A Multi-Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:417-:d:1016169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ni Wayan Masri & Jun-Jer You & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Effects of Customer Learning and Shopping Value on Intention Purchase and Reuse in a Digital Market: The Institutional Trust–Commitment Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Stephen P. Borgatti & Rob Cross, 2003. "A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 432-445, April.
    4. Lu Yan & Yong Tan, 2014. "Feeling Blue? Go Online: An Empirical Study of Social Support Among Patients," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 690-709, December.
    5. Hasan, Sharique & Koning, Rembrand, 2019. "Conversations and idea generation: Evidence from a field experiment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    6. Hong-Long Chen, 2021. "Impact of Communication on Capital Project Performance: A Mediated Moderation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Luciana Chavez & Carla Ruiz & Rafael Curras & Blanca Hernandez, 2020. "The Role of Travel Motivations and Social Media Use in Consumer Interactive Behaviour: A Uses and Gratifications Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dean Neu & Gregory D. Saxton & Abu S. Rahaman, 2022. "Social Accountability, Ethics, and the Occupy Wall Street Protests," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 17-31, September.
    2. Glòria Reig-Garcia & Cristina Bosch-Farré & Rosa Suñer-Soler & Dolors Juvinyà-Canal & Núria Pla-Vila & Rosa Noell-Boix & Esther Boix-Roqueta & Susana Mantas-Jiménez, 2021. "The Impact of a Peer Social Support Network from the Perspective of Women with Fibromyalgia: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Starling David Hunter & Henrik Bentzen & Jan Taug, 2020. "On the “missing link” between formal organization and informal social structure," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Myra Sader & Barthélemy Chollet & Sébastien Brion & Olivier Trendel, 2021. "Supported, detached, or marginalized? The ambivalent role of social capital on stress at work," Post-Print hal-03167159, HAL.
    5. Steffen Runge & Christian Schwens & Matthias Schulz, 2022. "The invention performance implications of coopetition: How technological, geographical, and product market overlaps shape learning and competitive tension in R&D alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 266-294, February.
    6. Chahine, Salim & Fang, Yiwei & Hasan, Iftekhar & Mazboudi, Mohamad, 2019. "Entrenchment through corporate social responsibility: Evidence from CEO network centrality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Raed S. Algharabat & Nripendra P. Rana, 0. "Social Commerce in Emerging Markets and its Impact on Online Community Engagement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    8. V. Kumar & Vikram Bhaskaran & Rohan Mirchandani & Milap Shah, 2013. "Practice Prize Winner ---Creating a Measurable Social Media Marketing Strategy: Increasing the Value and ROI of Intangibles and Tangibles for Hokey Pokey," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 194-212, March.
    9. Wen, Hong-xing & Wang, Chan & Nie, Pu-yan, 2021. "Acceleration of rural households’ conversion to cleaner cooking fuels: The importance and mechanisms of peer effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Viswanath Venkatesh & Tracy Ann Sykes, 2013. "Digital Divide Initiative Success in Developing Countries: A Longitudinal Field Study in a Village in India," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 239-260, June.
    11. Ignace Ng & Irene Chow, 2005. "Does Networking with Colleagues Matter in Enhancing Job Performance?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 405-421, December.
    12. Sharath Sasidharan & Radhika Santhanam & Daniel J. Brass & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2012. "The Effects of Social Network Structure on Enterprise Systems Success: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 658-678, September.
    13. Pedersen, Torben & Soda, Giuseppe & Stea, Diego, 2019. "Globally networked: Intraorganizational boundary spanning in the global organization," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 169-180.
    14. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    15. Jodi L. Short & Michael W. Toffel & Andrea R. Hugill, 2016. "Code Contingencies: Designing Monitoring Regimes to Promote Improvement in Supply Chain Working Conditions," Harvard Business School Working Papers 17-001, Harvard Business School, revised Mar 2019.
    16. Wei Chen & Yixin Lu & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Designing Personalized Treatment Plans for Breast Cancer," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 932-949, September.
    17. Claudio Vitari & Aurelio Ravarini & Bernard Fallery, 2006. "The Kms Recommending Experts In The Communities: Proposition Of A Theory On Their Success," Post-Print halshs-01924301, HAL.
    18. Hinz, Oliver & Schulze, Christian & Takac, Carsten, 2014. "New product adoption in social networks: Why direction matters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2836-2844.
    19. Pescher, Christian & Spann, Martin, 2014. "Relevance of actors in bridging positions for product-related information diffusion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1630-1637.
    20. James R. Barth & Sunghoon Joo & Kang‐Bok Lee, 2022. "Bank–client cross‐ownership of bank stocks: A network analysis," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(2), pages 280-312, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:417-:d:1016169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.