IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p239-d1013069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonlinear Integer Programming for Solving Preventive Maintenance Scheduling Problem for Cogeneration Plants with Production

Author

Listed:
  • Khaled Alhamad

    (The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, College of Technological Studies, PAAET, Kuwait City 70654, Kuwait)

  • Yousuf Alkhezi

    (The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, College of Basic Education, PAAET, Kuwait City 70654, Kuwait)

  • M. F. Alhajri

    (The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, College of Technological Studies, PAAET, Kuwait City 70654, Kuwait)

Abstract

Preventive maintenance (PM) is a maintenance program with activities created at a determined interval or according to certain principles, designed to reduce the likelihood of failure or deterioration of item performance. This aims to improve overall reliability and system availability. In this research, a preventive maintenance schedule (PMS) was designed for electricity and desalination of water in power plants, subject to meeting relevant constraints. The proposed methodology is used to generate a PMS for the boilers, turbines, and distillers. A nonlinear integer programming (NLIP) model was employed to address this problem. The results of the proposed method were compared with the PMS for a power station in Kuwait. The results were better in terms of the volume of production and in terms of the gap between the available production and demand in order to continue providing consumers with electricity and water without a shortage in the event of a breakdown in equipment. It produces an improvement of 12.12% and 16.58% respectively, for water and electricity. Furthermore, the sensitivity and robustness of the proposed method were analysed by increasing the maintenance duration for some equipment, increasing the demand, and adding various additional conditions. In addition, a comparison of additional conditions with a binary problem method in terms of computer time for the search for an optimal solution was carried out, where the model provided an optimal solution in a reasonable time. Among the most important benefits that the user can obtain for this technique are extending the life of the equipment, increasing efficiency, and reducing expenses.

Suggested Citation

  • Khaled Alhamad & Yousuf Alkhezi & M. F. Alhajri, 2022. "Nonlinear Integer Programming for Solving Preventive Maintenance Scheduling Problem for Cogeneration Plants with Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:239-:d:1013069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doostparast, Mohammad & Kolahan, Farhad & Doostparast, Mahdi, 2014. "A reliability-based approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 98-106.
    2. Go, Hun & Kim, Ji-Su & Lee, Dong-Ho, 2013. "Operation and preventive maintenance scheduling for containerships: Mathematical model and solution algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 626-636.
    3. Khaled Alhamad & Rym M’Hallah & Cormac Lucas, 2021. "A Mathematical Program for Scheduling Preventive Maintenance of Cogeneration Plants with Production," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Moghaddam, Kamran S., 2013. "Multi-objective preventive maintenance and replacement scheduling in a manufacturing system using goal programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 704-716.
    5. Perez-Canto, Salvador & Rubio-Romero, Juan Carlos, 2013. "A model for the preventive maintenance scheduling of power plants including wind farms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 67-75.
    6. Gao, Yicong & Feng, Yixiong & Zhang, Zixian & Tan, Jianrong, 2015. "An optimal dynamic interval preventive maintenance scheduling for series systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 19-30.
    7. Iyad Alawaysheh & Imad Alsyouf & Zain El-Abideen Tahboub & Hossam S. Almahasneh, 2020. "Selecting maintenance practices based on environmental criteria: a comparative analysis of theory and practice in the public transport sector in UAE/DUBAI," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1133-1155, December.
    8. Harvey M. Wagner & Richard J. Giglio & R. George Glaser, 1964. "Preventive Maintenance Scheduling by Mathematical Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 316-334, January.
    9. Canto, Salvador Perez, 2008. "Application of Benders' decomposition to power plant preventive maintenance scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 759-777, January.
    10. Ghaffarpour, Reza & Mozafari, Babak & Ranjbar, Ali Mohammad & Torabi, Taghi, 2018. "Resilience oriented water and energy hub scheduling considering maintenance constraint," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1092-1104.
    11. Feng, Yanling & Li, Guo & Sethi, Suresh P., 2018. "A three-layer chromosome genetic algorithm for multi-cell scheduling with flexible routes and machine sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 269-283.
    12. Haghani, Ali & Shafahi, Yousef, 2002. "Bus maintenance systems and maintenance scheduling: model formulations and solutions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 453-482, June.
    13. Khaled Alhamad & Mohsen Alardhi & Abdulla Almazrouee, 2015. "Preventive Maintenance Scheduling for Multicogeneration Plants with Production Constraints Using Genetic Algorithms," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-12, February.
    14. Lin, Boliang & Wu, Jianping & Lin, Ruixi & Wang, Jiaxi & Wang, Hui & Zhang, Xuhui, 2019. "Optimization of high-level preventive maintenance scheduling for high-speed trains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 261-275.
    15. Khaled Alhamad & Azizah Alrashidi & Sameh Alkharashi, 2019. "Metaheuristic algorithm for ship routing and scheduling problems with time window," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1616351-161, January.
    16. Cavory, G. & Dupas, R. & Goncalves, G., 2001. "A genetic approach to the scheduling of preventive maintenance tasks on a single product manufacturing production line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-3), pages 135-146, December.
    17. Zhou, Yu & Kou, Gang & Xiao, Hui & Peng, Yi & Alsaadi, Fawaz E., 2020. "Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance model with failure intensity reduction with an application to urban buses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Sirikarn Chansombat & Pupong Pongcharoen & Christian Hicks, 2019. "A mixed-integer linear programming model for integrated production and preventive maintenance scheduling in the capital goods industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 61-82, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Boliang & Zhao, Yinan, 2021. "Synchronized optimization of EMU train assignment and second-level preventive maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Lin, Boliang & Wu, Jianping & Lin, Ruixi & Wang, Jiaxi & Wang, Hui & Zhang, Xuhui, 2019. "Optimization of high-level preventive maintenance scheduling for high-speed trains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 261-275.
    3. Khaled Alhamad & Rym M’Hallah & Cormac Lucas, 2021. "A Mathematical Program for Scheduling Preventive Maintenance of Cogeneration Plants with Production," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Jiang, Junwei & An, Youjun & Dong, Yuanfa & Hu, Jiawen & Li, Yinghe & Zhao, Ziye, 2023. "Integrated optimization of non-permutation flow shop scheduling and maintenance planning with variable processing speed," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    5. Froger, Aurélien & Gendreau, Michel & Mendoza, Jorge E. & Pinson, Éric & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2016. "Maintenance scheduling in the electricity industry: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 695-706.
    6. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    7. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yanshun, 2022. "Minimum cost replacement and maintenance scheduling in dual-dissimilar-unit standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    8. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Xiang, Yanping, 2021. "Optimal multiple replacement and maintenance scheduling in two-unit systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Gizem Keysan & George L. Nemhauser & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2010. "Tactical and Operational Planning of Scheduled Maintenance for Per-Seat, On-Demand Air Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 291-306, August.
    10. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yanshun, 2021. "Joint optimal mission aborting and replacement and maintenance scheduling in dual-unit standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2021. "Influence of storage on mission success probability of m-out-of-n standby systems with reusable elements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Liu, Yu & Zhang, Qin & Ouyang, Zhiyuan & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2021. "Integrated production planning and preventive maintenance scheduling for synchronized parallel machines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    13. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    14. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    15. Sadeghian, Omid & Mohammadpour Shotorbani, Amin & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Risk-averse maintenance scheduling of generation units in combined heat and power systems with demand response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Kuschel, Torben & Bock, Stefan, 2016. "The weighted uncapacitated planned maintenance problem: Complexity and polyhedral properties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 773-781.
    17. Coria, V.H. & Maximov, S. & Rivas-Dávalos, F. & Melchor, C.L. & Guardado, J.L., 2015. "Analytical method for optimization of maintenance policy based on available system failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 55-63.
    18. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Liao, Haitao & Ma, Yizhong, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to two-phase imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    19. Ming-Liang Li, 2021. "Standardizing Components and Rotating Workers Using GT-Based Algorithm—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Zhaoming Yang & Qi Xiang & Yuxuan He & Shiliang Peng & Michael Havbro Faber & Enrico Zio & Lili Zuo & Huai Su & Jinjun Zhang, 2023. "Resilience of Natural Gas Pipeline System: A Review and Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:239-:d:1013069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.