IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12392-d929163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Analysis of the Relationships among Participatory Decision Making and Employees’ Task Performance and Personal Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong Sik Kim

    (Department of Business Administration, Daejin University, Pocheon-si 11159, Korea)

Abstract

Due to rapid changes in technology and the resulting increase in uncertainty, the organization is becoming more horizontal, and participatory decision making as an effective method of decision making has attracted more attention. This study empirically explored and verified the path through which participatory decision-making leads to employees’ task performance and personal growth. The author focused on the sequential mediating role of perceived job meaningfulness and job involvement. Hypotheses were tested using survey data from 453 supervisor–subordinate dyads within organizations, across multiple industrial sectors. The results confirmed the direct and indirect relationships between participatory decision making and employees’ task performance and personal growth. Additionally, perceived job meaningfulness and job involvement were found to sequentially mediate the relationship between participatory decision making and task performance, and that between participatory decision making and personal growth. This study empirically demonstrates the necessity and importance of participatory decision making and suggests a specific mechanism. Furthermore, it presents implications for using participatory decision making in organizations effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong Sik Kim, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of the Relationships among Participatory Decision Making and Employees’ Task Performance and Personal Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12392-:d:929163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12392/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nuril Iksyaniyah & Luqman Hakim & Agung Listyadi, 2021. "Effects of Work Experience, Education Level, and Wages on Employee Performance with Religiosity as Moderating Variables," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 16(1), pages 355-368, February.
    2. Andrew Mao & Winter Mason & Siddharth Suri & Duncan J Watts, 2016. "An Experimental Study of Team Size and Performance on a Complex Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Scully, Judith A. & Kirkpatrick, Shelley A. & Locke, Edwin A., 1995. "Locus of Knowledge as a Determinant of the Effects of Participation on Performance, Affect, and Perceptions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 276-288, March.
    4. Glavas, Ante & Kelley, Ken, 2014. "The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 165-202, April.
    5. Tu Yidong & Lu Xinxin, 2013. "How Ethical Leadership Influence Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior: A Perspective of Intrinsic Motivation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 441-455, August.
    6. Cabrera, Elizabeth F. & Ortega, Jaime & Cabrera, Ángel, 2003. "An exploration of the factors that influence employee participation in Europe," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 43-54, February.
    7. Morris M. Kleiner & Richard B. Freeman, 2000. "Who Benefits Most from Employee Involvement: Firms or Workers?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(2), pages 219-223, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeong-Sik Kim, 2023. "Effect of Psychological Meaningfulness on Job Involvement, Proactive Behavior, and Performance: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Seth Litwin, 2011. "Technological Change at Work: The Impact of Employee Involvement on the Effectiveness of Health Information Technology," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(5), pages 863-888, October.
    2. Dorgyles C.M. Kouakou, 2022. "Determinants of employees' participation in decision‐making in developing countries: Does a firm's formal versus informal status matter?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1501-1514, July.
    3. Sajjad A. Afridi & Bilal Afsar & Asad Shahjehan & Zia U. Rehman & Maqsood Haider & Mehboob Ullah, 2020. "Retracted: Perceived corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: The role of employee volunteerism and authenticity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1865-1877, July.
    4. Nathalie Greenan & Ekaterina Kalugina & Emmanuelle Walkowiak, 2014. "Has the quality of working life improved in the EU-15 between 1995 and 2005?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(2), pages 399-428.
    5. Timothy Rice, Cyril Peter, 2015. "Banking on Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 2(2), pages 256-273, October.
    6. Surhan Cam & Serap Palaz, 2023. "Mutual interests management with a purposive approach: Evidence from the Turkish shipyards for an amorphous impact model between (subjective) well‐being and performance," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 40-70, January.
    7. Wynen, Jan & Boon, Jan & Kleizen, Bjorn & Verhoest, Koen, 2020. "How multiple organizational changes shape managerial support for innovative work behavior : Evidence from the Australian Public Service," Other publications TiSEM 4f721d76-0c44-4d72-a494-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Aldona Glińska-Neweś & Joanna Górka, 2020. "Capabilities of Corporate Volunteering in Strengthening Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-11, September.
    9. Talat Islam & Saima Ahmad & Ishfaq Ahmed, 2023. "Linking environment specific servant leadership with organizational environmental citizenship behavior: the roles of CSR and attachment anxiety," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 855-879, April.
    10. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara, 2023. "Perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction in grocery retail: A comparison between low- and high-productivity stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Mariusz Zielinski & Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2020. "Profitability of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities from the Perspective of Corporate Social Managers," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 264-280.
    12. Wei Chi & Richard B. Freeman & Morris M. Kleiner, 2011. "Adoption and Termination of Employee Involvement Programs," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 25(1), pages 45-62, March.
    13. Jiali Chen & Aiqing Zhang, 2023. "Exploring How and When Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Impacts Employees’ Green Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Environmental Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Kraft, Kornelius, 2007. "Mitarbeiteranreizsysteme und Innovationserfolg," ZEW Discussion Papers 07-075, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    15. David A. Jones & Alexander Newman & Ruodan Shao & Fang Lee Cooke, 2019. "Advances in Employee-Focused Micro-Level Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: Situating New Contributions Within the Current State of the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 293-302, June.
    16. Tomasz L. Nawrocki & Danuta Szwajca, 2021. "A Multidimensional Comparative Analysis of Involvement in CSR Activities of Energy Companies in the Context of Sustainable Development Challenges: Evidence from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Sania Khan & Wadi B. Alonazi & Azam Malik & Noor Raihani Zainol, 2023. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Moderate the Nexus of Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Saskia Crucke & Marie Servaes & Tom Kluijtmans & Shana Mertens & Eveline Schollaert, 2022. "Linking environmentally‐specific transformational leadership and employees' green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 406-420, March.
    19. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Mehran Nejati & Azadeh Shafaei, 2023. "Why do employees respond differently to corporate social responsibility? A study of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2066-2080, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12392-:d:929163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.