IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10808-d902358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Walkability Policies in Developing Countries: What Do People Need and Prefer in Iran?

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Qazimirsaeed

    (Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 141171311, Iran)

  • Hanie Khosravi

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran 3391653755, Iran)

  • Mojtaba Rafieian

    (Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 141171311, Iran)

  • Hamid Mirzahossein

    (Civil-Transportation Planning, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin 3414916818, Iran)

  • Carmen Forciniti

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, CS, Italy)

Abstract

Examining the willingness to pay (WTP) in the implementation of walkability policies can indicate the needs and preferences of individuals. Consequently, better defined individual preferences lead to successful sustainable transportation plans. While there is an extensive literature discussing WTP in sustainable transportation, they mostly focus on developed countries, and this issue has not been adequately studied for developing countries, especially the Middle East. This study aims to determine the preferences of transportation users in developing countries and their willingness in paying to implement sustainable transportation policies. To this aim, 384 surveys were conducted in Karaj city, Iran, using the contingent valuation method (CVM). The WTP and its contextual criteria (household’s cost, demography, and economic class) and walkability criteria (safety, accessibility, network design, and social) were examined using PLS-SEM with 1000 resamples through the SEMinR package in the R programming language. The results show that 46% of participants were willing to pay extra taxes to implement the walkability policies. Furthermore, the structural model indicates that safety, social, spatial, and accessibility are the most important factors, respectively, and predict WTP in a positive direction. In contrast, gender and cost predict WTP in a negative direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Qazimirsaeed & Hanie Khosravi & Mojtaba Rafieian & Hamid Mirzahossein & Carmen Forciniti, 2022. "Walkability Policies in Developing Countries: What Do People Need and Prefer in Iran?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10808-:d:902358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Turoń, 2021. "Social barriers and transportation social exclusion issues in creating sustainable car-sharing systems," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(1), pages 10-22, September.
    2. Trichês Lucchesi, Shanna & Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Bettella Cybis, Helena Beatriz & Abreu e Silva, João António de & Arellana, Julian Alberto, 2021. "Are people willing to pay more to live in a walking environment? A multigroup analysis of the impact of walkability on real estate values and their moderation effects in two Global South cities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Gaurab Das Mahapatra & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2021. "Universal Mobility in Old Core Cities of India: People’s Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, April.
    4. Khaled Shaaban, 2019. "Assessing Sidewalk and Corridor Walkability in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2021. "The Analysis of the Factors Determining the Choice of Park and Ride Facility Using a Multinomial Logit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, January.
    6. Ivan Blečić & Tanja Congiu & Giovanna Fancello & Giuseppe Andrea Trunfio, 2020. "Planning and Design Support Tools for Walkability: A Guide for Urban Analysts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, May.
    7. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    8. Harvey, David, 2005. "The New Imperialism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199278084.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Omar Faruqe Hamim & Surendra Reddy Kancharla & Satish V Ukkusuri, 2024. "Mapping sidewalks on a neighborhood scale from street view images," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(4), pages 823-838, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azman ISMAIL & Rizal ABU BAKAR & Wan Aishah WAN MOHD NOWALID & Nurul Hayati ADNAN & Mohamad Azhari ABU BAKAR & Syed Shah ALAM, 2014. "Does Career Program Have Effect On Employee Outcomes? Empirical Evidence," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 152-166, November.
    2. Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi & Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Isha & Nicholas Chileshe & Mohammed Abdulrab & Anwar Ameen Hezam Saeed & Ahmed Farouk Kineber, 2021. "Modelling the Relationship between the Nature of Work Factors and Driving Performance Mediating by Role of Fatigue," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Apriani Soepardi & Pratikto Pratikto & Purnomo Budi Santoso & Ishardita Pambudi Tama & Patrik Thollander, 2018. "Linking of Barriers to Energy Efficiency Improvement in Indonesia’s Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    5. Harmancioglu, Nukhet & Grinstein, Amir & Goldman, Arieh, 2010. "Innovation and performance outcomes of market information collection efforts: The role of top management team involvement," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 33-43.
    6. Gupta, Prashant & Seetharaman, A. & Raj, John Rudolph, 2013. "The usage and adoption of cloud computing by small and medium businesses," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 861-874.
    7. Patricia M Martin, 2005. "Comparative Topographies of Neoliberalism in Mexico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(2), pages 203-220, February.
    8. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    9. Diego Norena-Chavez, 2022. "Influence of SARS-CoV-2 on the Mediating Effect of Entrepreneurial Passion in the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Innovative Behavior," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 125-139.
    10. Teller, Christoph & Kotzab, Herbert & Grant, David B., 2012. "The relevance of shopper logistics for consumers of store-based retail formats," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 59-66.
    11. Behroozeh, Samira & Hayati, Dariush & Karami, Ezatollah, 2022. "Determining and validating criteria to measure energy consumption sustainability in agricultural greenhouses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    12. Ahmed, Abubakari & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi & Gasparatos, Alexandros, 2018. "The role of chiefs in large-scale land acquisitions for jatropha production in Ghana: insights from agrarian political economy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 570-582.
    13. Shami, Mohammad Reza & Rad, Vahid Bigdeli & Moinifar, Maryam, 2022. "The structural model of indicators for evaluating the quality of urban smart living," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    15. Knudsen, Daniel C. & Rickly, Jillian M. & Vidon, Elizabeth S., 2016. "The fantasy of authenticity: Touring with Lacan," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    16. Zaitul Zaitul & Novianti Neva & Ilona Desi, 2022. "Village-Based Tourism Performance: Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intention," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 36-43, June.
    17. Sarah Ryser, 2019. "The Anti-Politics Machine of Green Energy Development: The Moroccan Solar Project in Ouarzazate and Its Impact on Gendered Local Communities," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    19. Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi & Idris Othman & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ahmad A. Mousa & Ahmad M. A. Zamil, 2022. "Modeling the Impact of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Implementation Factors on Continuance Intention of Students: PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10808-:d:902358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.