IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8831-d866400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Mohsin

    (College of International Finance and Trade, Zhejiang YueXiu University of Foreign Languages, Shaoxing 312000, China)

  • Yin Hengbin

    (School of Finance and Trade, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou 325035, China)

  • Zhang Luyao

    (School of Business, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Li Rui

    (College of International Finance and Trade, Zhejiang YueXiu University of Foreign Languages, Shaoxing 312000, China)

  • Qian Chong

    (School of Finance and Trade, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou 325035, China)

  • Ana Mehak

    (College of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China)

Abstract

In Pakistan, the fisheries sector is capable of making a significant contribution to the national economy. However, the proper and sustainable development of this sector is essential to its success, and we need to be aware of all the risks that it faces. At present, there is a dearth of comprehensive research that details, compares, and proposes applied measures to mitigate the risks facing the fisheries sector. Thus, this study is the first novel attempt to fill this gap. The data were collected through a survey and analyzed by multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The study postulates that Sindh fisheries are affected by five main risk factors, namely technical, market, ecological, natural, and management. These risk factors are arranged from least to most significant. With regard to the performances of the main risk factors, management risk was ranked as the greatest risk, followed by ecological risk, natural risk, and technical risk. The findings of this study provide a road map for managerial decisions. Furthermore, this study also presents some potential limitations related to the scale of the data and analysis methods. Future studies may therefore use data collected on a large scale and alternative quantitative approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Mohsin & Yin Hengbin & Zhang Luyao & Li Rui & Qian Chong & Ana Mehak, 2022. "An Application of Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Risk Prioritization and Management: A Case Study of the Fisheries Sector in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8831-:d:866400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8831/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8831/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Gongming & Heino, Mikko, 2014. "An overview of marine fisheries management in China," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 265-272.
    2. Kirby, David Seán & Ward, Peter, 2014. "Standards for the effective management of fisheries bycatch," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 419-426.
    3. Hasnain Raza & Qun Liu & Mohammed Shahidul Alam & Yanan Han, 2022. "Length Based Stock Assessment of Five Fish Species from the Marine Water of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    5. Mabon, Leslie & Kawabe, Midori, 2017. "Making sense of complexity in risk governance in post-disaster Fukushima fisheries: A scalar approach," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 173-183.
    6. Roy Endré Dahl & Atle Oglend & Muhammad Yahya, 2021. "Salmon Stock Market Prices Revealing Salmon Price Information," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(2), pages 173-190.
    7. Pitcher, Tony J. & Kalikoski, Daniela & Short, Katherine & Varkey, Divya & Pramod, Ganapathiraju, 2009. "An evaluation of progress in implementing ecosystem-based management of fisheries in 33 countries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 223-232, March.
    8. Xiaoyan Su & Sankaran Mahadevan & Peida Xu & Yong Deng, 2015. "Dependence Assessment in Human Reliability Analysis Using Evidence Theory and AHP," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1296-1316, July.
    9. Velandia, Margarita & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Knight, Thomas O. & Sherrick, Bruce J., 2009. "Factors Affecting Farmers' Utilization of Agricultural Risk Management Tools: The Case of Crop Insurance, Forward Contracting, and Spreading Sales," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 107-123, April.
    10. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    11. de Bruyn, Paul & Murua, Hilario & Aranda, Martín, 2013. "The Precautionary approach to fisheries management: How this is taken into account by Tuna regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs)," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 397-406.
    12. Huang, Biao & Perrings, Charles, 2017. "Managing the Risks of Sea Lice Transmission Between Salmon Aquaculture and Wild Pink Salmon Fishery," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 228-237.
    13. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Jing, You-Yin & Zhang, Chun-Fa & Zhao, Jun-Hong, 2009. "Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2263-2278, December.
    14. Pan, Min & Huntington, Henry P., 2016. "A precautionary approach to fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean: Policy, science, and China," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 153-157.
    15. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    16. Giamalaki, Marina & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2019. "Sustainable siting of solar power installations in Mediterranean using a GIS/AHP approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 64-75.
    17. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    18. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 1998. "Diagnosis with Dependent Symptoms: Bayes Theorem and the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 491-502, August.
    19. Sturla Kvamsdal & Diwakar Poudel & Leif Sandal, 2016. "Harvesting in a Fishery with Stochastic Growth and a Mean-Reverting Price," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(3), pages 643-663, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Mehak & Yongtong Mu & Muhammad Mohsin & Xing-Can Zhang, 2023. "MCDM-Based Ranking and Prioritization of Fisheries’ Risks: A Case Study of Sindh, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Muhammad Mohsin & Hengbin Yin & Weilun Huang & Shijun Zhang & Luyao Zhang & Ana Mehak, 2022. "Evaluation of Occupational Health Risk Management and Performance in China: A Case Study of Gas Station Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    4. Ping-Lung Huang & Bruce C.Y. Lee & Chen-Song Wang & Chi-Te Sun, 2017. "Relative Importance of the Factors under the ISO-10015 Quality Management Guidelines that Influence the Service Quality of Certification Bodies," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 105-137, February.
    5. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Kazim Topuz & Ali Dag & Asil Oztekin, 2019. "An AHP-IFT Integrated Model for Performance Evaluation of E-Commerce Web Sites," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1345-1355, December.
    6. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Levialdi, Nathan & Menichini, Tamara, 2019. "Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 155-168.
    7. Minwir Al-Shammari & Mehdi Mili, 2021. "A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model for customers’ bank selection decision in the Kingdom of Bahrain," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1429-1446, September.
    8. Jamal, Taskin & Urmee, Tania & Shafiullah, G.M., 2020. "Planning of off-grid power supply systems in remote areas using multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    9. Kayakutlu, Gülgün & Büyüközkan, Gülçin, 2008. "Assessing knowledge-based resources in a utility company: Identify and prioritise the balancing factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1027-1037.
    10. Badreya Gharib Khamis Mohammed Alblooshi & Syed Zamberi Ahmad & Matloub Hussain & Sanjay Kumar Singh, 2022. "Sustainable management of electronic waste: Empirical evidences from a stakeholders' perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1856-1874, May.
    11. Chiung-Wen Hsu, 2014. "Key Factors and Recommendations for Adopting Renewable Energy Systems by Families and Firms," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 13(1), pages 39-58, June.
    12. Kahraman, Cengiz & Ertay, Tijen & Buyukozkan, Gulcin, 2006. "A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 390-411, June.
    13. Chia-Liang Lin & Ching-Yun Hsu & Chu-Ho Ting, 2024. "Research on the Key Influencing Goals for Visual Design Sustainability: A Dual Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-28, February.
    14. Caprioli, Caterina & Bottero, Marta, 2021. "Addressing complex challenges in transformations and planning: A fuzzy spatial multicriteria analysis for identifying suitable locations for urban infrastructures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Jin-Ling Yan & Yong-Jie Xue & Muhammad Mohsin, 2022. "Accessing Occupational Health Risks Posed by Fishermen Based on Fuzzy AHP and IPA Methods: Management and Performance Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Mukund Pratap Singh & Pitam Singh & Priyamvada Singh, 2019. "Fuzzy AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making analysis for route alignment planning using geographic information system (GIS)," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 395-432, September.
    17. D. Bajić & D. Polomčić & J. Ratković, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Purposes of Groundwater Control System Design," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(15), pages 4759-4784, December.
    18. Vecihi Yiğit & Nazlı Nisa Demir & Hisham Alidrisi & Mehmet Emin Aydin, 2020. "Elicitation of the Factors Affecting Electricity Distribution Efficiency Using the Fuzzy AHP Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Somsuk, Nisakorn & Laosirihongthong, Tritos, 2014. "A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 198-210.
    20. Sumanta Das & Abhiram Yadav Myla & Akhilesh Barve & Anil Kumar & Naresh Chandra Sahu & Kamalakanta Muduli & Sunil Luthra, 2023. "A systematic assessment of multi‐dimensional risk factors for sustainable development in food grain supply chains: A business strategic prospective analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5536-5562, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8831-:d:866400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.