IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7131-d835850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land-Use Optimization Based on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration around Poyang Lake, China

Author

Listed:
  • Moli Gu

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Changsheng Ye

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Xin Li

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Haiping Hu

    (School of Earth Sciences, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

The optimal allocation of land use is a promising approach to achieving the sustainable use of land resources, to weigh ecological protection and economic development. The urban agglomeration around Poyang Lake is a crucial plate for implementing the spatial planning policy of the national urban agglomeration and supporting the development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Based on the ecosystem service value (ESV), we utilize the minimum cumulative resistance (MCR), the gray multi-objective planning (GMOP) and the future land-use simulation (FLUS) model to optimize the quantitative structure and spatial pattern of the land use in 2030. The present study designs four scenarios of baseline development (BD), ecological conservation (EC), economic priority (EP) and coordinated development (CD) to discuss how to optimize land-use allocation while considering ecological security and economic development. The result suggests that the land-use structure and spatial layout in the CD_scenario are relatively reasonable, and the overall eco-economic benefits and landscape pattern levels are better than those of the other three scenarios. Additionally, the ecological security and landscape pattern indices are optimized, landscape fragmentation decreases and aggregation degree increases. This study is instructive to promote the sustainable development of urban agglomeration and land spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Moli Gu & Changsheng Ye & Xin Li & Haiping Hu, 2022. "Land-Use Optimization Based on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration around Poyang Lake, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7131-:d:835850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gu, Rongbao & Liu, Shengnan, 2022. "Nonlinear analysis of economic policy uncertainty: Based on the data in China, the US and the global," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 593(C).
    2. Chakir, Raja & Le Gallo, Julie, 2013. "Predicting land use allocation in France: A spatial panel data analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 114-125.
    3. Xia Li & Guangzhao Chen & Xiaoping Liu & Xun Liang & Shaojian Wang & Yimin Chen & Fengsong Pei & Xiaocong Xu, 2017. "A New Global Land-Use and Land-Cover Change Product at a 1-km Resolution for 2010 to 2100 Based on Human–Environment Interactions," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(5), pages 1040-1059, September.
    4. Glover, Fred & Martinson, Fred, 1987. "Multiple-use land planning and conflict resolution by multiple objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 343-350, March.
    5. Hangang Hu & Lisha Pan & Xin Jing & Guan Li & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Yang Chen & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Non-Stationary Effect of Industrial Agglomeration on Urban Land Use Efficiency: A Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Wang, Liye & Zhang, Siyu & Tang, Lanping & Lu, Yanchi & Liu, Yanfang & Liu, Yaolin, 2022. "Optimizing distribution of urban land on the basis of urban land use intensity at prefectural city scale in mainland China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Li, Mingquan & Shan, Rui & Hernandez, Mauricio & Mallampalli, Varun & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2019. "Effects of population, urbanization, household size, and income on electric appliance adoption in the Chinese residential sector towards 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 293-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yunlong Li & Shuping Huang & Xianglun Kong & Mei Han & Min Wang & Hongkuan Hui, 2022. "Ecological Effects of Surface Water Evolution in the Yellow River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parvez, Md Rezwanul & Ripplinger, David & Maduraperuma, Buddhika, 2015. "Modeling Land Use Pattern Change Analysis in the Northern Great Plains: A Novel Approach," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205868, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Kuschnig, Nikolas, 2021. "Bayesian Spatial Econometrics and the Need for Software," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 318, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Shuting Bai & Jiuchun Yang & Yubo Zhang & Fengqin Yan & Lingxue Yu & Shuwen Zhang, 2022. "Evaluating Ecosystem Services and Trade-Offs Based on Land-Use Simulation: A Case Study in the Farming–Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Fernandes, Leonardo H.S. & Silva, José W.L. & de Araujo, Fernando H.A. & Ferreira, Paulo & Aslam, Faheem & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda, 2022. "Interplay multifractal dynamics among metal commodities and US-EPU," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    6. Basak Bayramoglu & Raja CHAKIR & Anna LUNGARSKA, 2016. "Land Use and Freshwater Ecosystems in France," EcoMod2016 9420, EcoMod.
    7. Camacho, Carmen & Pérez-Barahona, Agustín, 2015. "Land use dynamics and the environment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 96-118.
    8. Müller, Jonas & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2020. "Spatial projections of solar PV installations at subnational level: Accuracy testing of regression models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    9. Shukui Tan & Lu Zhang & Min Zhou & Yanan Li & Siliang Wang & Bing Kuang & Xiang Luo, 2017. "A hybrid mathematical model for urban land-use planning in association with environmental–ecological consideration under uncertainty," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(1), pages 54-79, January.
    10. Chonabayashi, Shun, 2014. "Accounting for Land Use Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts on US Agriculture," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170710, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Oléron-Evans, Thomas P. & Salhab, Melda, 2021. "Optimal land use allocation for the Heathrow opportunity area using multi-objective linear programming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    12. Chuanrong Zhang & Xinba Li, 2022. "Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in the Era of Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    13. W. Saart, Patrick & Kim, Namhyun & Bateman, Ian, 2021. "Understanding spatial heterogeneity in GB agricultural land-use for improved policy targeting," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2021/8, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    14. Kikuko Shoyama, 2021. "Assessment of Land-Use Scenarios at a National Scale Using Intensity Analysis and Figure of Merit Components," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    15. Jean-Sauveur Ay & Raja Chakir & Luc Doyen & Frédéric Jiguet & Paul Leadley, 2014. "Integrated models, scenarios and dynamics of climate, land use and common birds," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 13-30, September.
    16. Abildtrup, Jens & Garcia, Serge & Stenger, Anne, 2013. "The effect of forest land use on the cost of drinking water supply: A spatial econometric analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 126-136.
    17. Yanan Li & Linghua Duo & Ming Zhang & Zhenhua Wu & Yanjun Guan, 2021. "Assessment and Estimation of the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Landscape Patterns and Their Impact on Habitat Quality in Nanchang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Milne, Russell & Anand, Madhur & Bauch, Chris T., 2023. "Preparing for and managing crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks on reefs under threat from interacting anthropogenic stressors," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    19. Qing Wang & Yuhang Xiao, 2022. "Has Urban Construction Land Achieved Low-Carbon Sustainable Development? A Case Study of North China Plain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    20. Lungarska, Anna & Chakir, Raja, 2018. "Climate-induced Land Use Change in France: Impacts of Agricultural Adaptation and Climate Change Mitigation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 134-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7131-:d:835850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.