IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p6979-d833302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EnviroCoin: A Holistic, Blockchain Empowered, Consensus-Based Carbon Saving Unit Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Shokri

    (EnviroCoin, Sydney 2089, Australia)

  • Ali Shokri

    (EnviroCoin, Sydney 2089, Australia)

  • Dean White

    (EnviroCoin, Sydney 2089, Australia)

  • Richard Gelski

    (EnviroCoin, Sydney 2089, Australia)

  • Yosse Goldberg

    (EnviroCoin, Sydney 2089, Australia)

  • Stephen Harrison

    (EnviroCoin, Sydney 2089, Australia)

  • Taha Hossein Rashidi

    (EnviroCoin, Sydney 2089, Australia
    School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2052, Australia)

Abstract

The capacity of the greenhouse gas recycling mechanism in nature has long reached its limit, resulting in a sharply increasing trend in the marginal cost of recycling one unit of human-produced carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions. Externalities associated with the marginal cost of greenhouse gas emissions affect health, climate, and the economy, which have urged global authorities and governments to request urgent actions to slow down the production of such pollutants. Nonetheless, without public awareness and a holistic mechanism to monetise the impact of pollutants, a universal strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is condemned to failure. This paper presents an overview of emerging technologies that can come together to offer an innovative solution for monetising, incentivising and realising the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Through a brief review of the literature, an innovative ecosystem is proposed for the first time, accounting for a unified platform for carbon verification, validation and monetisation, which can be adopted as a business model to validate and monetise the amount of incentivising businesses and people for carbon saving on a decentralised blockchain platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Shokri & Ali Shokri & Dean White & Richard Gelski & Yosse Goldberg & Stephen Harrison & Taha Hossein Rashidi, 2022. "EnviroCoin: A Holistic, Blockchain Empowered, Consensus-Based Carbon Saving Unit Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:6979-:d:833302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khaqqi, Khamila Nurul & Sikorski, Janusz J. & Hadinoto, Kunn & Kraft, Markus, 2018. "Incorporating seller/buyer reputation-based system in blockchain-enabled emission trading application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 8-19.
    2. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    3. Rajna Gibson & Simon Glossner & Philipp Krueger & Pedro Matos & Tom Steffen, 2020. "Responsible Institutional Investing Around the World," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 20-13, Swiss Finance Institute.
    4. Sadawi, Alia Al & Madani, Batool & Saboor, Sara & Ndiaye, Malick & Abu-Lebdeh, Ghassan, 2021. "A comprehensive hierarchical blockchain system for carbon emission trading utilizing blockchain of things and smart contract," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Zhang, Bin & Xu, Liang, 2013. "Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 118-127.
    6. Eyraud, Luc & Clements, Benedict & Wane, Abdoul, 2013. "Green investment: Trends and determinants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 852-865.
    7. Robert D. Klassen & Curtis P. McLaughlin, 1996. "The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(8), pages 1199-1214, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arsenii Vilkov & Gang Tian, 2023. "Blockchain’s Scope and Purpose in Carbon Markets: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Ji Tan & S. B. Goyal & Anand Singh Rajawat & Tony Jan & Neda Azizi & Mukesh Prasad, 2023. "Anti-Counterfeiting and Traceability Consensus Algorithm Based on Weightage to Contributors in a Food Supply Chain of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Thomas Liaw, 2020. "Survey of Green Bond Pricing and Investment Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Alena Kocmanová & Marie Pavláková Dočekalová & Tomáš Meluzín & Stanislav Škapa, 2020. "Sustainable Investing Model for Decision Makers (Based On Research of Manufacturing Industry in the Czech Republic)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Gillan, Stuart L. & Koch, Andrew & Starks, Laura T., 2021. "Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Chasing the ESG factor," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin & Pallab Kumar Biswas, 2022. "Does winning a CSR Award increase firm value?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 313-329, September.
    7. Prayag Lal Yadav & Seung Hun Han & Hohyun Kim, 2017. "Manager’s Dilemma: Stockholders’ and Consumers’ Responses to Corporate Environmental Efforts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Tao, Hu & Zhuang, Shan & Xue, Rui & Cao, Wei & Tian, Jinfang & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Alberto Barroso Del Toro & Laura Vivas Crisol & Xavier Tort-Martorell, 2022. "The Sustainability Narrative: A Multi Study Using Event Studies to Analyse the American Energy Companies Shareholder’s Reaction to Sustainability News," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Chen, Yufeng & Ma, Yanbai, 2021. "Does green investment improve energy firm performance?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Ye Lim Jung & Hyoung Sun Yoo, 2023. "Environmental, social, and governance activities and firm performance: Global evidence and the moderating effect of market competition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2830-2839, November.
    12. Yanbing Wang & Michael S. Delgado & Jin Xu, 2023. "When and where does it pay to be green? – A look into socially responsible investing and the cost of equity capital," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Tiago Gonçalves & Diego Pimentel & Cristina Gaio, 2021. "Risk and Performance of European Green and Conventional Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Felipe Arias Fogliano de Souza Cunha & Erick Meira & Renato J. Orsato, 2021. "Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3821-3838, December.
    15. José M. Brotons & Manuel E. Sansalvador, 2020. "The relation between corporate social responsibility certification and financial performance: An empirical study in Spain," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1465-1477, May.
    16. Markus Arnold & Alexander Bassen & Ralf Frank, 2018. "Timing effects of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an experimental study with investment professionals," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 45-71, January.
    17. Zhao Chen & Ling Hu & Xin He & Ziming Liu & Danni Chen & Weirui Wang, 2022. "Green Financial Reform and Corporate ESG Performance in China: Empirical Evidence from the Green Financial Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Lajili Jarjir, Souad & Nasreddine, Aya & Desban, Marc, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility as a common risk factor," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    19. Malgorzata Janicka & Artur Sajnog, 2021. "The European Union’s Environmental Policy and Long-Term Investments of Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 335-355.
    20. Alaa Aldowaish & Jiro Kokuryo & Othman Almazyad & Hoe Chin Goi, 2022. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Integration into the Business Model: Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:6979-:d:833302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.