IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6106-d817867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Thermal Energy Saving Potential and Overheating Risk of Four Adaptive Façade Technologies in Office Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Shady Attia

    (Sustainable Building Design Lab, Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Applied Sciences, Université de Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium)

  • Stéphanie Bertrand

    (Sustainable Building Design Lab, Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Applied Sciences, Université de Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium)

  • Mathilde Cuchet

    (Sustainable Building Design Lab, Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Applied Sciences, Université de Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
    EPF Graduate School of Engineering, 94230 Cachan, France)

  • Siliang Yang

    (School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK)

  • Amir Tabadkani

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Geelong Waterfront Campus, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

Abstract

Adaptive façades are gaining greater importance in highly efficient buildings under a warming climate. There is an increasing demand for adaptive façades designed to regulate solar and thermal gains/losses, as well as avoid discomfort and glare issues. Occupants and developers of office buildings ask for a healthy and energy-neutral working environment. Adaptive façades are appropriate dynamic solutions controlled automatically or through occupant interaction. However, relatively few studies compared their energy and overheating risk performance, and there is still a vast knowledge gap on occupant behavior in operation. Therefore, we chose to study four dynamic envelopes representing four different façade families: dynamic shading, electrochromic glazing, double-skin, and active ventilative façades. Three control strategies were chosen to study the dynamic aspect of solar control, operative temperature, and glare control. Simulations were realized with EnergyPlus on the BESTEST case 600 from the ASHRAE standard 140/2020 for the temperate climate of Brussels. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to study the most influential parameters. The study findings indicate that dynamic shading devices and electrochromic glazing have a remarkable influence on the annual thermal energy demand, decreasing the total annual loads that can reach 30%. On the other hand, BIPV double-skin façades and active ventilative façades (cavity façades) could be more appropriate for cold climates. The study ranks the four façade technologies and provides novel insights for façade designers and building owners regarding the annual energy performance and overheating risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Shady Attia & Stéphanie Bertrand & Mathilde Cuchet & Siliang Yang & Amir Tabadkani, 2022. "Comparison of Thermal Energy Saving Potential and Overheating Risk of Four Adaptive Façade Technologies in Office Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6106-:d:817867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Favoino, Fabio & Overend, Mauro & Jin, Qian, 2015. "The optimal thermo-optical properties and energy saving potential of adaptive glazing technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Butt, Afaq A. & de Vries, Samuel B. & Loonen, Roel C.G.M. & Hensen, Jan L.M. & Stuiver, Anthonie & van den Ham, Jonathan E.J. & Erich, Bart S.J.F., 2021. "Investigating the energy saving potential of thermochromic coatings on building envelopes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    3. Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Fabrizio, Enrico & Filippi, Marco & Monetti, Valentina, 2013. "Reference buildings for cost optimal analysis: Method of definition and application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 983-993.
    4. Cannavale, Alessandro & Hörantner, Maximilian & Eperon, Giles E. & Snaith, Henry J. & Fiorito, Francesco & Ayr, Ubaldo & Martellotta, Francesco, 2017. "Building integration of semitransparent perovskite-based solar cells: Energy performance and visual comfort assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 94-107.
    5. Casini, Marco, 2018. "Active dynamic windows for buildings: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 923-934.
    6. Peng, Jinqing & Curcija, Dragan C. & Lu, Lin & Selkowitz, Stephen E. & Yang, Hongxing & Zhang, Weilong, 2016. "Numerical investigation of the energy saving potential of a semi-transparent photovoltaic double-skin facade in a cool-summer Mediterranean climate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 345-356.
    7. Jayathissa, P. & Luzzatto, M. & Schmidli, J. & Hofer, J. & Nagy, Z. & Schlueter, A., 2017. "Optimising building net energy demand with dynamic BIPV shading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 726-735.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberts, Frank & Yang, Siliang & Du, Hu & Yang, Rebecca, 2023. "Effect of semi-transparent a-Si PV glazing within double-skin façades on visual and energy performances under the UK climate condition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 601-610.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Efurosibina Attoye & Kheira Anissa Tabet Aoul & Ahmed Hassan, 2017. "A Review on Building Integrated Photovoltaic Façade Customization Potentials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Shen, Yi & Xue, Peng & Luo, Tao & Zhang, Yanyun & Tso, Chi Yan & Zhang, Nan & Sun, Yuying & Xie, Jingchao & Liu, Jiaping, 2022. "Regional applicability of thermochromic windows based on dynamic radiation spectrum," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 15-27.
    3. Vassiliades, C. & Agathokleous, R. & Barone, G. & Forzano, C. & Giuzio, G.F. & Palombo, A. & Buonomano, A. & Kalogirou, S., 2022. "Building integration of active solar energy systems: A review of geometrical and architectural characteristics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Cannavale, Alessandro & Ierardi, Laura & Hörantner, Maximilian & Eperon, Giles E. & Snaith, Henry J. & Ayr, Ubaldo & Martellotta, Francesco, 2017. "Improving energy and visual performance in offices using building integrated perovskite-based solar cells: A case study in Southern Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 834-846.
    5. Roberta Moschetti & Shabnam Homaei & Ellika Taveres-Cachat & Steinar Grynning, 2022. "Assessing Responsive Building Envelope Designs through Robustness-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Zero-Emission Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Skandalos, Nikolaos & Wang, Meng & Kapsalis, Vasileios & D'Agostino, Delia & Parker, Danny & Bhuvad, Sushant Suresh & Udayraj, & Peng, Jinqing & Karamanis, Dimitris, 2022. "Building PV integration according to regional climate conditions: BIPV regional adaptability extending Köppen-Geiger climate classification against urban and climate-related temperature increases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Marchini, F. & Chiatti, C. & Fabiani, C. & Pisello, A.L., 2023. "Development of an innovative translucent–photoluminescent coating for smart windows applications: An experimental and numerical investigation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Huang, Junchao & Yu, Jinghua & Yang, Hongxing, 2018. "Effects of key factors on the heat insulation performance of a hollow block ventilated wall," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 409-423.
    9. Cheng, Yuanda & Gao, Min & Jia, Jie & Sun, Yanyi & Fan, Yi & Yu, Min, 2019. "An optimal and comparison study on daylight and overall energy performance of double-glazed photovoltaics windows in cold region of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 356-366.
    10. Cheng, Yuanda & Gao, Min & Dong, Jiankai & Jia, Jie & Zhao, Xudong & Li, Guiqiang, 2018. "Investigation on the daylight and overall energy performance of semi-transparent photovoltaic facades in cold climatic regions of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 517-526.
    11. Gao, Yuan & Dong, Jianfei & Isabella, Olindo & Santbergen, Rudi & Tan, Hairen & Zeman, Miro & Zhang, Guoqi, 2018. "A photovoltaic window with sun-tracking shading elements towards maximum power generation and non-glare daylighting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1454-1472.
    12. Ghosh, Aritra & Norton, Brian, 2018. "Advances in switchable and highly insulating autonomous (self-powered) glazing systems for adaptive low energy buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1003-1031.
    13. Mohammad Khairul Basher & Mohammad Nur-E-Alam & Md Momtazur Rahman & Steven Hinckley & Kamal Alameh, 2022. "Design, Development, and Characterization of Highly Efficient Colored Photovoltaic Module for Sustainable Buildings Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Li Zhu & Peng Wang & Yujiao Huo & Wei Tian & Yong Sun & Baoquan Yin, 2022. "Energy Savings Potential of Semitransparent Photovoltaic Skylights under Different Climate Conditions in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Gigih Rahmandhani Setyantho & Hansaem Park & Seongju Chang, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Performance Assessment for Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Windows in Different Climate Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Peng, Jinqing & Curcija, Dragan C. & Thanachareonkit, Anothai & Lee, Eleanor S. & Goudey, Howdy & Selkowitz, Stephen E., 2019. "Study on the overall energy performance of a novel c-Si based semitransparent solar photovoltaic window," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 854-872.
    17. Cannavale, Alessandro & Hörantner, Maximilian & Eperon, Giles E. & Snaith, Henry J. & Fiorito, Francesco & Ayr, Ubaldo & Martellotta, Francesco, 2017. "Building integration of semitransparent perovskite-based solar cells: Energy performance and visual comfort assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 94-107.
    18. Shaohang Shi & Ning Zhu, 2023. "Challenges and Optimization of Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) Windows: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-30, November.
    19. Zhina Rashidzadeh & Negar Heidari Matin, 2023. "A Comparative Study on Smart Windows Focusing on Climate-Based Energy Performance and Users’ Comfort Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, January.
    20. Wang, Chuyao & Li, Niansi & Gu, Tao & Ji, Jie & Yu, Bendong, 2022. "Design and performance investigation of a novel double-skin ventilated window integrated with air-purifying blind," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6106-:d:817867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.