IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5851-d813705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Cultural Orientations on Country Innovation Performance: Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Revisited?

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Escandon-Barbosa

    (Gestion de Organizaciones Department, Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Administrativas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali 760031, Colombia)

  • Agustin Ramirez

    (Gestion de Organizaciones Department, Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Administrativas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali 760031, Colombia)

  • Jairo Salas-Paramo

    (Gestion de Organizaciones Department, Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Administrativas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali 760031, Colombia)

Abstract

Purpose. One of the perspectives that receives the most attention from studies in international business is cultural dimensions. This is due to the greater complexity and incidence of cultural aspects in economic performance. This paper explored the moderation effect of cultural orientations on the creation of innovation trajectories related to levels of innovation and their outcomes in countries from various geographical areas between 2011 and 2021. Design/Methodology/Approach. A growth trajectories model is conducted to achieve the research’s aim, considering the country’s cultural orientation, innovation inputs (institutions, human capital and research, infrastructure, market sophistication, and business sophistication), and impact on innovation output. The Global Innovation Index, Globe Project, and Global Entrepreneurship Index databases used this analysis, containing data from nations on different continents. The trajectories’ analysis approach is utilized to achieve the desired goal, which allows for the assessment of the variations in innovation trajectory across countries with cultural tendencies towards performance and humane orientation from 2011 to 2021. Findings. The literature affirms positive results for various innovation inputs, but the results show differences in innovation outputs. The difference is related to their inputs (institutions, human capital and research, infrastructure, market sophistication, business sophistication), institutions, and market sophistication. Additionally, a difference depends on the country’s performance culture, generating options to obtain higher outputs, such as knowledge and creative results. Research Limitations/Implications. Based on the results achieved, an attempt is made to provide a different perspective on innovation, especially evaluating the results over time and identifying decreasing trajectories that affect the innovation results in countries with different economic development conditions and cultural characteristics. Practical Implications. The results achieved make it possible to strengthen the analysis of the countries’ strategies regarding innovation, especially in the permanent evaluation of the results, which encourages changes in the execution of innovative activities to maintain their performance over time. Social Implications. The contributions allow us to understand the dynamics of innovation in countries’ knowledge and creative outputs over time. Originality/Value. The trajectory analysis used in the data analysis is perhaps one of the most robust techniques for a time series analysis. This allows for identifying trajectories for the study’s independent variables and their influence on a country’s innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Escandon-Barbosa & Agustin Ramirez & Jairo Salas-Paramo, 2022. "The Effect of Cultural Orientations on Country Innovation Performance: Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Revisited?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5851-:d:813705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5851/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5851/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tekic, Anja & Tekic, Zeljko, 2021. "Culture as antecedent of national innovation performance: Evidence from neo-configurational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 385-396.
    2. Diana Escandon-Barbosa & Jairo Salas-Paramo & Josep Rialp-Criado, 2021. "Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions as a Moderator of the Relationship between Ambidextrous Learning and Corporate Sustainability in Born Global Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Anneli Kaasa & Maaja Vadi, 2010. "How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 583-604.
    4. Fayaz Ahmad Sheikh & Saradindu Bhaduri, 2020. "Grassroots innovations in the informal economy: insights from value theory," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 85-99, June.
    5. Kadia Georges Aka & François Labelle, 2021. "The Collaborative Process of Sustainable Innovations under the Lens of Actor–Network Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-32, September.
    6. Joel R. Matthews, 2017. "Understanding Indigenous Innovation in Rural West Africa: Challenges to Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Current Social Innovation Practice," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 223-238, April.
    7. Rasmus Lema & Erika Kraemer-Mbula & Marija Rakas, 2021. "Innovation in developing countries: examining two decades of research," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2-3), pages 189-210, September.
    8. Blasques, F. & Gorgi, P. & Koopman, S.J., 2019. "Accelerating score-driven time series models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 359-376.
    9. Shane, Scott, 1993. "Cultural influences on national rates of innovation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 59-73, January.
    10. Escandon-Barbosa, Diana & Salas-Paramo, Jairo & Meneses-Franco, Ana Isabel & Giraldo- Gonzalez, Carlos, 2021. "Adoption of new technologies in developing countries: The case of autonomous car between Vietnam and Colombia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Marina Candi & Monia Melia & Maria Colurcio, 2019. "Two Birds with One Stone: The Quest for Addressing Both Business Goals and Social Needs with Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 1019-1033, December.
    12. Sedgley, Norman & Elmslie, Bruce, 2010. "Reinterpreting the Jones critique: A time series approach to testing and understanding idea driven growth models with transitional dynamics," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 103-117, March.
    13. Andreeva, Tatiana & Garanina, Tatiana & Sáenz, Josune & Aramburu, Nekane & Kianto, Aino, 2021. "Does country environment matter in the relationship between intellectual capital and innovation performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 263-273.
    14. Gupta, Amit Kumar, 2021. "Innovation dimensions and firm performance synergy in the emerging market: A perspective from Dynamic Capability Theory & Signaling Theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zonglong Li & Wenyi Zhang & Yanhui Zhou & Derong Kang & Biao Feng & Qing Zeng & Lingling Xu & Minqiang Zhang, 2022. "College Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention and Alertness in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rakesh Sambharya & Martina Musteen, 2014. "Institutional environment and entrepreneurship: An empirical study across countries," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 314-330, December.
    2. Han-Sol Lee & Sergey U. Chernikov & Szabolcs Nagy & Ekaterina A. Degtereva, 2022. "The Impact of National Culture on Innovation: A Comparative Analysis between Developed and Developing Nations during the Pre- and Post-Crisis Period 2007–2021," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Kaasa, Anneli, 2016. "Culture, religion and productivity: Evidence from European regions," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 12(1), pages 1-18.
    4. Anneli Kaasa, 2018. "Intangible factors and productivity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(2), pages 300-325, April.
    5. Cathrin Söllner & Dirk Fornahl, 2021. "Unleashing Inventive Power - Solving cognitive, social and geographic distance issues with cultural proximity," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2103, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    6. Hemin Song & Zitong Zhao & Arup Varma, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainable Input on Regional Innovation Performance: Moderating Effects of Policy Support and Cultural Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Švarc, Jadranka & Lažnjak, Jasminka & Dabić, Marina, 2019. "Regional innovation culture in innovation laggard: A case of Croatia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Barreto, Tais S. & Lanivich, Stephen E. & Cox, Kevin C., 2022. "Temporal orientation as a robust predictor of innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 287-300.
    9. Rubino, Michele & Vitolla, Filippo & Raimo, Nicola & Garzoni, Antonello, 2019. "Cultura nazionale e livello di digitalizzazione delle imprese europee: evidenze empiriche," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 581-593.
    10. G. Martinidis & N. Komninos & E. Carayannis, 2022. "Taking into Account the Human Factor in Regional Innovation Systems and Policies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 849-879, June.
    11. Viola Isabel Nyssen Guillén & Carsten Deckert, 2021. "Cultural influence on innovativeness - links between “The Culture Map” and the “Global Innovation Index”," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Vladyslav Soloviov, 2022. "Linking regional autonomy–embeddedness value orientation and innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Adam Novotny & Inez Szeberin & Sándor Kovács & Domicián Máté, 2022. "National Culture and the Market Development of Battery Electric Vehicles in 21 Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Tekic, Anja & Tekic, Zeljko, 2021. "Culture as antecedent of national innovation performance: Evidence from neo-configurational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 385-396.
    15. Setiawan, Andri D., 2020. "The influence of national culture on responsible innovation: A case of CO2 utilisation in Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Juan Piñeiro-Chousa & Lara Quiñoá-Piñeiro & Helena Santos-Rodrigues, 2021. "How Can Cultural Values and Entrepreneurship Lead to the Consideration of Innovation-Oriented or Non-Innovation-Oriented Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, April.
    17. Ron Boschma & Simona Iammarino & Raffaele Paci & Jordy Suriñach & Anneli Kaasa, 2017. "Culture and Innovation: Evidence from the European Union and Neighbouring Countries," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(1), pages 109-128, February.
    18. Anneli Kaasa, 2016. "Culture, religion and productivity: Evidence from European regions," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 12(1), pages 11-28, April.
    19. Isabel Gallego-Álvarez & María Consuelo Pucheta-Martínez, 2021. "Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and R&D intensity as an innovation strategy: a view from different institutional contexts," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 191-220, June.
    20. Denise Tsang, 2009. "The Institutional Sources of Innovation in Korean and UK Online Gaming Firms," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2009-08, Department of Economics, University of Reading.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5851-:d:813705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.