IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4975-d545758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of the Industry 4.0 Concept on Slovak Business Sustainability within the Issue of the Pandemic Outbreak

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Grenčíková

    (Faculty of Social and Economic Relations, Alexander Dubček University in Trenčín, 91150 Trenčín, Slovakia)

  • Marcel Kordoš

    (Faculty of Social and Economic Relations, Alexander Dubček University in Trenčín, 91150 Trenčín, Slovakia)

  • Jozef Bartek

    (Faculty of Social and Economic Relations, Alexander Dubček University in Trenčín, 91150 Trenčín, Slovakia)

  • Vladislav Berkovič

    (Faculty of Social and Economic Relations, Alexander Dubček University in Trenčín, 91150 Trenčín, Slovakia)

Abstract

Many studies have found that the most significant job structure changes in the Slovak business environment can be expected in production and logistics. The biggest manpower shortages are in the fields of mechanical engineering, production, construction, information sciences and communication technologies, and medical sciences. The smallest manpower shortage can be found in the humanities and social science areas. The main objective of this research was to assess the trends within the Slovak labor market from the perspective of the companies that participated in a survey focused on their assumptions on job structure changes in the context of the implementation of the elements of Industry 4.0. The estimation was based on a questionnaire conducted during the spring months of 2020 with the participation of 175 companies and institutions. The results showed that one third of companies anticipate job cuts in the implementation of smart industry. Along with the job position disposal and the qualified staffs’ need for new jobs, the demands of employers regarding the level of education are growing. On the other hand, three quarters of companies are not only willing but also ready to participate in human resource vocational training and requalification focused mainly on technical skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Grenčíková & Marcel Kordoš & Jozef Bartek & Vladislav Berkovič, 2021. "The Impact of the Industry 4.0 Concept on Slovak Business Sustainability within the Issue of the Pandemic Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4975-:d:545758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4975/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4975/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Nagler & Marc Piopiunik & Martin R. West, 2020. "Weak Markets, Strong Teachers: Recession at Career Start and Teacher Effectiveness," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(2), pages 453-500.
    2. Mark Sanders & Axel Marx & Mikael Stenkula (ed.), 2020. "The Entrepreneurial Society," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Springer, number 978-3-662-61007-7, March.
    3. Kikuchi, Shinnosuke & Kitao, Sagiri & Mikoshiba, Minamo, 2021. "Who suffers from the COVID-19 shocks? Labor market heterogeneity and welfare consequences in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Kamil Židek & Ján Piteľ & Milan Adámek & Peter Lazorík & Alexander Hošovský, 2020. "Digital Twin of Experimental Smart Manufacturing Assembly System for Industry 4.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Rinaldo Evangelista & Paolo Guerrieri & Valentina Meliciani, 2014. "The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 802-824, November.
    7. Vladimir Modrak & Zuzana Soltysova & Daniela Onofrejova, 2019. "Complexity Assessment of Assembly Supply Chains from the Sustainability Viewpoint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Sorgner, Alina & Bode, Eckhardt & Krieger-Boden, Christiane & Aneja, Urvashi & Coleman, Susan & Mishra, Vidisha & Robb, Alicia M., 2017. "The effects of digitalization on gender equaliy in the G20 economies: Women20 study," Kiel E-Books, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), number 170571.
    9. Vladimir Modrak & Zuzana Soltysova, 2020. "Management of Product Configuration Conflicts to Increase the Sustainability of Mass Customization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Wennberg, Karl & Larsson, Anne-Sophie & Fu, Kun, 2018. "Habitual Entrepreneurs in the Making: How Labour Market Rigidity and Employment Affects Entrepreneurial Re-entry," Ratio Working Papers 315, The Ratio Institute.
    11. Kun Fu & Anne-Sophie Larsson & Karl Wennberg, 2018. "Habitual entrepreneurs in the making: how labour market rigidity and employment affects entrepreneurial re-entry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 465-482, August.
    12. Ishaan Gera & Seema Singh, 2019. "A Critique of Economic Literature on Technology and Fourth Industrial Revolution: Employment and the Nature of Jobs," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 62(4), pages 715-729, December.
    13. Liotti, Giorgio, 2020. "Labour market flexibility, economic crisis and youth unemployment in Italy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 150-162.
    14. Janka Betáková & Katarína Havierniková & Małgorzata Okręglicka & Monika Mynarzova & Robert Magda, 2020. "The role of universities in supporting entrepreneurial intentions of students toward sustainable entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 573-589, September.
    15. Matthew J. Notowidigdo, 2020. "The Incidence of Local Labor Demand Shocks," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(3), pages 687-725.
    16. Bettina Becker & Nigel Driffield & Sandra Lancheros & James H. Love, 2020. "FDI in hot labour markets: The implications of the war for talent," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(2), pages 107-133, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siti Fardaniah Abdul Aziz & Norashikin Hussein & Nor Azilah Husin & Muhamad Ariff Ibrahim, 2022. "Trainers’ Characteristics Affecting Online Training Effectiveness: A Pre-Experiment among Students in a Malaysian Secondary School," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Sergi, Bruno S. & Ključnikov, Aleksandr & Popkova, Elena G. & Bogoviz, Aleksei V. & Lobova, Svetlana V., 2022. "Creative abilities and digital competencies to transitioning to Business 4.0," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 401-411.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Zhao & Weijian Guo, 2022. "Does Land Certification Stimulate Farmers’ Entrepreneurial Enthusiasm? Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Adriana Grenčíková & Marcel Kordoš & Vladislav Berkovič, 2020. "The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Jobs Creation within the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Family Businesses in Slovakia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Chen Zhou & Huatao Peng & Bingbing Li, 2022. "How Risk Prevention Mechanisms Regulate Serial Entrepreneurs to Achieve Sustainable Entrepreneurship—A Policy Text Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Maribel Guerrero & Jorge Espinoza-Benavides, 2021. "Do emerging ecosystems and individual capitals matter in entrepreneurial re-entry’ quality and speed?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1131-1158, September.
    5. Jaroslaw Ropega, 2020. "Novice and habitual entrepreneurs and external business support exploitation," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 18(2B), pages 271-285.
    6. Nils Karlson & Christian Sandström & Karl Wennberg, 2021. "Bureaucrats or Markets in Innovation Policy? – a critique of the entrepreneurial state," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 81-95, March.
    7. Karl Wennberg, 2020. "Towards an innovative entrepreneurship policy," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 587-590, April.
    8. Linda Elizabeth Ruiz & José Ernesto Amorós & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "Does gender matter for corporate entrepreneurship? A cross-countries study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 929-946, March.
    9. Rodgers, Waymond & Degbey, William Y. & Söderbom, Arne & Leijon, Svante, 2022. "Leveraging international R&D teams of portfolio entrepreneurs and management controllers to innovate: Implications of algorithmic decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 232-244.
    10. Lucia Svabova & Eva Nahalkova Tesarova & Marek Durica & Lenka Strakova, 2021. "Evaluation of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of the unemployment rate in Slovakia: counterfactual before-after comparison," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(2), pages 261-284, June.
    11. Sebastián Uriarte & Jorge Espinoza-Benavides & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2023. "Engagement in entrepreneurship after business failure. Do formal institutions and culture matter?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 941-973, June.
    12. Ioscha Cordier & Marco Bade, 2023. "The relationship between business regulation and nascent and young business entrepreneurship revisited," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 587-616, August.
    13. Kumju Hwang & Jinsook Choi, 2021. "How Do Failed Entrepreneurs Cope with Their Prior Failure When They Seek Subsequent Re-Entry into Serial Entrepreneurship? Failed Entrepreneurs’ Optimism and Defensive Pessimism and Coping Humor as a ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Biagi, Federico & Falk, Martin, 2017. "The impact of ICT and e-commerce on employment in Europe," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-18.
    15. Furtado, Delia & Kong, Haiyang, 2021. "How Do Low-Skilled Immigrants Adjust to Chinese Import Shocks? Evidence Using English Language Proficiency," IZA Discussion Papers 14152, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Philipp vom Berge & Achim Schmillen, 2023. "Effects of mass layoffs on local employment—evidence from geo-referenced data," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 509-539.
    17. Stefano Magrini & Alessandro Spiganti, 2021. "The Day After Covid-19: Implications for Growth, Specialization, and Inequality," Working Papers 2021:13, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    18. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    19. Chirakijja, Janjala, 2023. "The economic effects of prison closures on local communities," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Ana Tribin & Karen García-Rojas & Paula Herrera-Idarraga & Leonardo Fabio Morales & Natalia Ramirez-Bustamante, 2023. "Shecession: The Downfall of Colombian Women During the Covid-19 Pandemic," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 158-193, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4975-:d:545758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.