IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4727-d541836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Approaches, Risks, and Product Performance in Managing the Development Process of Complex Products Sustainably

Author

Listed:
  • Salah Ahmed Mohamed Almoslehy

    (CFisUC, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, The University of Coimbra, Rua Larga, P-3004 516 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Mohammed Saad Alkahtani

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
    Raytheon Chair for Systems Engineering, Advanced Manufacturing Institute, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

In the Industry 4.0 environment, being sustainably competitive is essential in global markets. In an endeavor to optimize the added value in the design process of complex products such as robots, managing the development process of such products is studied. The present study identifies the level of product performance that yields maximum return on product development in Industry 4.0. The study also identifies and reviews the key approaches to understanding and managing the design process of such complex products. It has been found that the hybrid approach is the most efficient approach. The study proposes an approach to effectively manage risk in the product design process that hybridizes attributes of both the lean and agile design paradigms. The proposed approach has been validated using five case studies with 99% level of statistical confidence. The results of this study enable efficient development of complex products such as robotic systems towards realizing sustainable competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Salah Ahmed Mohamed Almoslehy & Mohammed Saad Alkahtani, 2021. "Key Approaches, Risks, and Product Performance in Managing the Development Process of Complex Products Sustainably," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4727-:d:541836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4727/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4727/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. D. Guenov & S. G. Barker, 2005. "Application of axiomatic design and design structure matrix to the decomposition of engineering systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 29-40.
    2. Clark, Kim B. & Fujimoto, Takahiro, 1992. "Product development and competitiveness," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 101-143, June.
    3. Morris A. Cohen & Jehoshua Eliasberg & Teck-Hua Ho, 1996. "New Product Development: The Performance and Time-to-Market Tradeoff," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 173-186, February.
    4. Federica Murmura & Laura Bravi & Gilberto Santos, 2021. "Sustainable Process and Product Innovation in the Eyewear Sector: The Role of Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Mohan V. Tatikonda & Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss, 2001. "Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 151-172, January.
    6. Vangelis Souitaris, 1999. "Research On The Determinants Of Technological Innovation: A Contingency Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(03), pages 287-305.
    7. Reza Ahmadi & Robert H. Wang, 1999. "Managing Development Risk in Product Design Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 235-246, April.
    8. Ayoub Al-Zabidi & Ateekh Ur Rehman & Mohammed Alkahtani, 2021. "An Approach to Assess Sustainable Supply Chain Agility for a Manufacturing Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    10. Luis Miguel Fonseca & José Pedro Domingues & Maria Teresa Pereira & Florinda Figueiredo Martins & Dominik Zimon, 2018. "Assessment of Circular Economy within Portuguese Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Varun Tripathi & Somnath Chattopadhyaya & Alok Bhadauria & Shubham Sharma & Changhe Li & Danil Yurievich Pimenov & Khaled Giasin & Sunpreet Singh & Girish Dutt Gautam, 2021. "An Agile System to Enhance Productivity through a Modified Value Stream Mapping Approach in Industry 4.0: A Novel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    2. Carly Jacobs & Katie Soulliere & Susan Sawyer-Beaulieu & Abir Sabzwari & Edwin Tam, 2022. "Challenges to the Circular Economy: Recovering Wastes from Simple versus Complex Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Zhiqiang Zhang & Ling Li & Huiying Zhang, 2022. "A Sustainable Innovation Strategy Oriented toward Complex Product Servitization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nitindra R. Joglekar & Ali A. Yassine & Steven D. Eppinger & Daniel E. Whitney, 2001. "Performance of Coupled Product Development Activities with a Deadline," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1605-1620, December.
    2. Koufteros, Xenophon & Lu, Guanyi & Peters, Richard C. & Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2014. "Product development practices, manufacturing practices, and performance: A mediational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 83-97.
    3. Tang, Christopher S., 2010. "A review of marketing-operations interface models: From co-existence to coordination and collaboration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 22-40, May.
    4. Van Delft, Christian & Kerbache, Laoucine & El Khoury, Hiba, 2011. "Optimal strategy for stochastic product rollover under risk using CVAR analysis," HEC Research Papers Series 958, HEC Paris.
    5. Joglekar, Nitindra R., 2003. "Performance of coupled product development activities with a deadline," Working papers WP 4122-00., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Demirci, Ece Zeliha & Erkip, Nesim, 2024. "Integrating efforts for product development and market penetration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 927-937.
    7. Chen, Hong Long, 2023. "Influence of supply chain risks on project financial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Cheng, Cheng-Feng & Chang, Man-Ling & Li, Chu-Shiu, 2013. "Configural paths to successful product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2561-2573.
    9. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    10. Beatriz Andres & Vicente Javier Blanes, 2020. "A Negotiation Approach to Support the Strategies Alignment Process in Collaborative Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, April.
    11. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Tang, Liang & Jing, Ke & He, Jie & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2016. "Robustness of assembly supply chain networks by considering risk propagation and cascading failure," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 459(C), pages 129-139.
    13. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.
    14. Kathy A. Paulson Gjerde & Susan A. Slotnick & Matthew J. Sobel, 2002. "New Product Innovation with Multiple Features and Technology Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(10), pages 1268-1284, October.
    15. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    16. Seyyed Mohammad Seyyed Alizadeh Ganji & Mohammad Hayati, 2016. "Identifying and Assessing the Risks in the Supply Chain," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(6), pages 1-74, June.
    17. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    18. Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 654-666.
    19. Jimmi Normann Kristiansen & Frank Gertsen, 2015. "Is Radical Innovation Management Misunderstood? Problematising The Radical Innovation Discipline," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Bilsel, R. Ufuk & Ravindran, A., 2011. "A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1284-1300, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4727-:d:541836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.