IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3611-d523267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Verification of Prototypical Office Buildings Models Using the National Building Energy Consumption Survey in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hye-Jin Kim

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Korea)

  • Do-Young Choi

    (Korea Energy Economics Institute, 405-11, Jongga-ro, Jung-gu, Ulsan 44543, Korea)

  • Donghyun Seo

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk 28644, Korea)

Abstract

In the early 2000s, the Korean government mandated the construction of only zero-energy residential buildings by 2025 and for non-residential buildings from 2030. Two decades since the start of building energy policy enforcement, Korean experts believe that it is time to evaluate its impact. However, few studies have systematically and extensively examined the energy consumption characteristics of the non-residential building stock. In this study, a framework development is implemented for defining non-residential prototypical office buildings based on Korea’s first large-scale non-residential building survey result from the Korea Energy Economics Institute (KEEI). Then, a detailed building energy model of the defined prototypical building is constructed to verify the model’s energy estimation against observed energy consumption. As an application of the model, a case study for energy policy evaluation utilizing the constructed prototypical building model is presented. Every researcher and county may have their own circumstances when gathering definition data. However, by using the best available representative data, this suggested framework may result in informed decisions regarding energy policy development and evaluation. In addition, the mitigation of greenhouse gases from buildings may be expedited.

Suggested Citation

  • Hye-Jin Kim & Do-Young Choi & Donghyun Seo, 2021. "Development and Verification of Prototypical Office Buildings Models Using the National Building Energy Consumption Survey in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3611-:d:523267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Fabrizio, Enrico & Filippi, Marco & Monetti, Valentina, 2013. "Reference buildings for cost optimal analysis: Method of definition and application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 983-993.
    2. Im, Piljae & Joe, Jaewan & Bae, Yeonjin & New, Joshua R., 2020. "Empirical validation of building energy modeling for multi-zones commercial buildings in cooling season," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    3. Attia, Shady & Shadmanfar, Niloufar & Ricci, Federico, 2020. "Developing two benchmark models for nearly zero energy schools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attia, Shady & Canonge, Théophile & Popineau, Mathieu & Cuchet, Mathilde, 2022. "Developing a benchmark model for renovated, nearly zero-energy, terraced dwellings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    2. Shady Attia, 2020. "Spatial and Behavioral Thermal Adaptation in Net Zero Energy Buildings: An Exploratory Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Brandão de Vasconcelos, Ana & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Manso, Armando & Cabaço, António, 2015. "A Portuguese approach to define reference buildings for cost-optimal methodologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 316-328.
    4. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Moyano, Juan & Rodríguez-Jiménez, Carlos E. & Marín, David, 2019. "Applying an artificial neural network to assess thermal transmittance in walls by means of the thermometric method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 1-14.
    5. Aste, Niccolò & Adhikari, R.S. & Manfren, Massimiliano, 2013. "Cost optimal analysis of heat pump technology adoption in residential reference buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 615-624.
    6. Yoon, Y. & Jung, S. & Im, P. & Salonvaara, M. & Bhandari, M. & Kunwar, N., 2023. "Empirical validation of building energy simulation model input parameter for multizone commercial building during the cooling season," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Walsh, Angélica & Cóstola, Daniel & Labaki, Lucila Chebel, 2018. "Performance-based validation of climatic zoning for building energy efficiency applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 416-427.
    8. Pengying Wang & Shuo Zhang, 2022. "Retrofitting Strategies Based on Orthogonal Array Testing to Develop Nearly Zero Energy Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Attia, Shady & Shadmanfar, Niloufar & Ricci, Federico, 2020. "Developing two benchmark models for nearly zero energy schools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    10. Roberto Bruno & Piero Bevilacqua & Cristina Carpino & Natale Arcuri, 2020. "The Cost-Optimal Analysis of a Multistory Building in the Mediterranean Area: Financial and Macroeconomic Projections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Shazia Noor & Hadeed Ashraf & Muhammad Sultan & Zahid Mahmood Khan, 2020. "Evaporative Cooling Options for Building Air-Conditioning: A Comprehensive Study for Climatic Conditions of Multan (Pakistan)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Aste, Niccolò & Leonforte, Fabrizio & Manfren, Massimiliano & Mazzon, Manlio, 2015. "Thermal inertia and energy efficiency – Parametric simulation assessment on a calibrated case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 111-123.
    13. Delmastro, Chiara & Mutani, Guglielmina & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo, 2016. "A supporting method for selecting cost-optimal energy retrofit policies for residential buildings at the urban scale," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 42-56.
    14. Kyoungcheol Oh & Eui-Jong Kim & Chang-Young Park, 2022. "A Physical Model-Based Data-Driven Approach to Overcome Data Scarcity and Predict Building Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Zakula, Tea & Bagaric, Marina & Ferdelji, Nenad & Milovanovic, Bojan & Mudrinic, Sasa & Ritosa, Katia, 2019. "Comparison of dynamic simulations and the ISO 52016 standard for the assessment of building energy performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    16. Buso, Tiziana & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo, 2017. "A customized modelling approach for multi-functional buildings – Application to an Italian Reference Hotel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1302-1315.
    17. Ganiç, Neşe & Yılmaz, A. Zerrin, 2014. "Adaptation of the cost optimal level calculation method of Directive 2010/31/EU considering the influence of Turkish national factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 94-107.
    18. Ascione, Fabrizio & Bianco, Nicola & De Stasio, Claudio & Mauro, Gerardo Maria & Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter, 2016. "Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 37-68.
    19. de Rubeis, Tullio & Nardi, Iole & Ambrosini, Dario & Paoletti, Domenica, 2018. "Is a self-sufficient building energy efficient? Lesson learned from a case study in Mediterranean climate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 131-145.
    20. Jaewan Joe & Piljae Im & Jin Dong, 2020. "Empirical Modeling of Direct Expansion (DX) Cooling System for Multiple Research Use Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3611-:d:523267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.