IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2516-d506230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Dine, or Not to Dine on a Cruise Ship in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Tripartite Approach towards an Understanding of Behavioral Intentions among Female Passengers

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandar Radic

    (Independent Researcher, Gornji kono 8, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia)

  • Michael Lück

    (School of Hospitality & Tourism, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)

  • Amr Al-Ansi

    (College of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Bee-Lia Chua

    (Department of Food Service and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Sabrina Seeler

    (DITF-German Institute for Tourism Research, West Coast University of Applied Sciences, 25746 Heide, Germany)

  • António Raposo

    (CBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Jinkyung Jenny Kim

    (School of Hotel and Tourism Management, Youngsan University, Busan 48015, Korea)

  • Heesup Han

    (College of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

Abstract

Given that cruise line companies are rushing to restart their operations with modified dining services, the aim of this research is to establish a conceptual framework that precisely outlines female passengers’ behavioral intentions towards dining on cruise ships in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. It does so by extending the theory of reasoned action (TRA) by including the social servicescape of the cruise ship dining experiencescape (stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) paradigm) and perceived health risk from COVID-19 (the prospect theory). The developed theoretical framework based on this tripartite approach has predictive power for intentions. Its effectiveness and comprehensiveness are also demonstrated. Despite the positive effect of the social servicescape on attitude and emotions and the positive attitude of female cruise travelers, the negative effect of the perceived health risk from COVID-19 appears to be the dominant factor that ultimately discourages the behavioral intentions of female cruise passengers towards dining on a cruise ship in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. The present research provides a crucial guiding framework that helps cruise academics and operators to maximize existing and potential passengers’ favorable decisions and behaviors for cruise ship dining.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandar Radic & Michael Lück & Amr Al-Ansi & Bee-Lia Chua & Sabrina Seeler & António Raposo & Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Heesup Han, 2021. "To Dine, or Not to Dine on a Cruise Ship in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Tripartite Approach towards an Understanding of Behavioral Intentions among Female Passengers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2516-:d:506230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Olya, Hossein G.T. & Al-ansi, Amr, 2018. "Risk assessment of halal products and services: Implication for tourism industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 279-291.
    4. Sharma, Abhinav & Nicolau, Juan Luis, 2020. "An open market valuation of the effects of COVID-19 on the travel and tourism industry," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Aleksandar Radic & Rob Law & Michael Lück & Haesang Kang & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Juan M. Arjona-Fuentes & Heesup Han, 2020. "Apocalypse Now or Overreaction to Coronavirus: The Global Cruise Tourism Industry Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    7. François Desmoulins-Lebeault & Luc Meunier & Sima Ohadi, 2020. "Does Implied Volatility Pricing Follow the Tenets of Prospect Theory?," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 157-173, April.
    8. Figueroa-Domecq, Cristina & Pritchard, Annette & Segovia-Pérez, Mónica & Morgan, Nigel & Villacé-Molinero, Teresa, 2015. "Tourism gender research: A critical accounting," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 87-103.
    9. Yang, Elaine Chiao Ling & Khoo-Lattimore, Catheryn & Arcodia, Charles, 2017. "A systematic literature review of risk and gender research in tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 89-100.
    10. Liang Wang & Xavier Didelot & Jing Yang & Gary Wong & Yi Shi & Wenjun Liu & George F. Gao & Yuhai Bi, 2020. "Inference of person-to-person transmission of COVID-19 reveals hidden super-spreading events during the early outbreak phase," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, December.
    11. Brown, Lorraine & Osman, Hanaa, 2017. "The female tourist experience in Egypt as an Islamic destination," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 12-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suellen Tapsall & Geoffrey N Soutar & Wendy A Elliott & Tim Mazzarol & Jennifer Holland, 2022. "COVID-19’s impact on the perceived risk of ocean cruising: A best-worst scaling study of Australian consumers," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(1), pages 248-271, February.
    2. Aleksandar Radic & Bonhak Koo & Eloy Gil-Cordero & Juan Pedro Cabrera-Sánchez & Heesup Han, 2021. "Intention to Take COVID-19 Vaccine as a Precondition for International Travel: Application of Extended Norm-Activation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda & Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Lorena Araya-Silva, 2021. "Port Governance and Cruise Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Agustina Calatayud & Santiago Sánchez González & Jose Maria Marquez, 2022. "Using big data to estimate the impact of cruise activity on congestion in port cities," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 566-583, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Fan, Xiangli & Wang, Jingqiang & Xiao, Honggen, 2021. "Women's travel in the Tang Dynasty: Gendered identity in a hierarchical society," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Helena Hansson & Carl Johan Lagerkvist, 2014. "Decision Making for Animal Health and Welfare: Integrating Risk‐Benefit Analysis with Prospect Theory," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 1149-1159, June.
    4. Zamri Ahmad & Haslindar Ibrahim & Jasman Tuyon, 2017. "Institutional investor behavioral biases: syntheses of theory and evidence," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(5), pages 578-603, May.
    5. Morshedi, Mohamad Ali & Kashani, Hamed, 2022. "Assessment of vulnerability reduction policies: Integration of economic and cognitive models of decision-making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Schwanen, Tim & Ettema, Dick, 2009. "Coping with unreliable transportation when collecting children: Examining parents' behavior with cumulative prospect theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 511-525, June.
    7. Moncada, J.A. & Tao, Z. & Valkering, P. & Meinke-Hubeny, F. & Delarue, E., 2021. "Influence of distribution tariff structures and peer effects on the adoption of distributed energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    8. Avineri, Erel, 2012. "On the use and potential of behavioural economics from the perspective of transport and climate change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 512-521.
    9. Giannikos, Christos I. & Kakolyris, Andreas & Suen, Tin Shan, 2023. "Prospect theory and a manager's decision to trade a blind principal bid basket," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    10. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.
    11. Caballero, William N. & Lunday, Brian J., 2019. "Influence modeling: Mathematical programming representations of persuasion under either risk or uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 266-282.
    12. Lange, Florian & Brückner, Carolin & Kröger, Birte & Beller, Johannes & Eggert, Frank, 2014. "Wasting ways: Perceived distance to the recycling facilities predicts pro-environmental behavior," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 246-254.
    13. MinJae Lee & JinKyu Lee, 2012. "The impact of information security failure on customer behaviors: A study on a large-scale hacking incident on the internet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 375-393, April.
    14. Grace B. Villamor & Andrew Dunningham & Philip Stahlmann-Brown & Peter W. Clinton, 2022. "Improving the Representation of Climate Change Adaptation Behaviour in New Zealand’s Forest Growing Sector," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Metcalfe, Robert & Dolan, Paul, 2012. "Behavioural economics and its implications for transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 503-511.
    16. Shareef, Mahmud A. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Wright, Angela & Kumar, Vinod & Sharma, Sujeet K. & Rana, Nripendra P, 2021. "Lockdown and sustainability: An effective model of information and communication technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Shin, Soye & Magnan, Nicholas & Mullally, Conner & Janzen, Sarah, 2022. "Demand for Weather Index Insurance among Smallholder Farmers under Prospect Theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 82-104.
    18. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2019. "Extended consumer responsibility: Syncretic value-oriented pricing strategies for trade-in-for-upgrade programs," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 350-367.
    19. Xin Wang & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Quan Zhou & Yu He Pang, 2021. "Regional Travel as an Alternative Form of Tourism during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impacts of a Low-Risk Perception and Perceived Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Kuriakose, Francis & Joseph, Janssen, 2019. "The Origin and Nature of Behavioural Development Economics," MPRA Paper 97079, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2516-:d:506230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.