IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13771-d701682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Sustainability Risk in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry

Author

Listed:
  • André Luiz Romano

    (Department of Science and Technology, Universidade Aberta, 1250-100 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira

    (CEMMPRE, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3004-531 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Sandra Sofia F. S. Caeiro

    (Department of Science and Technology, Universidade Aberta, 1250-100 Lisboa, Portugal
    Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research (CENSE ), School of Science and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, 2829-516 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Supply chains involve several stakeholders, with different environmental, social, economic, and ethical attributes, and are exposed to various risks along all stages. One of these risks relates to conditions or events related to sustainability that have the potential to generate harmful reactions from stakeholders in the supply chain. Those risks can materialize through stakeholders’ responses, when they hold companies responsible for unfavorable conditions in the supply chain, leading to reputational damage. Understanding the supply chain’s sustainability risk factors can help companies improve supply chain resilience. This article aims to empirically identify the most influential risk factors in the Brazilian cosmetics supply chain and, additionally, analyze the interrelationships between these risks. The methodology combines interpretative structural modeling (ISM) and matrix cross-impact multiplication (MICMAC) analysis, and is grounded in the opinions of cosmetics industry experts. Firstly, the critical causes and consequences are identified, called factors. Secondly, the ISM model is built, representing the interrelationships between factors and their hierarchy. Thirdly, the MICMAC analysis is performed, unfolding the strength of the relationship among the influencing factors. Fourthly, measures are designed to act on and mitigate the factors identified in the previous steps. The results show that the Brazilian cosmetic companies analyzed do not take advantage of the opportunity to take leadership in cost reduction, differentiation, and engagement with their partners. “Financial risks” were identified as the most influential among the set of risks, while “Technology and innovation” and “Legislation and responsibility” were identified as root risk factors. This research identified measures that could be implemented to act on and mitigate the root risk factors, thus contributing to the research relating to sustainability risks in supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • André Luiz Romano & Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira & Sandra Sofia F. S. Caeiro, 2021. "Modelling Sustainability Risk in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13771-:d:701682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Supply Chain Risk Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 3-11, Springer.
    2. Muzzammil Wasim Syed & Ji Zu Li & Muhammad Junaid & Xue Ye & Muhammad Ziaullah, 2019. "An Empirical Examination of Sustainable Supply Chain Risk and Integration Practices: A Performance-Based Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Jorge Arnaldo Troche-Escobar & Herman Augusto Lepikson & Francisco Gaudêncio Mendonça Freires, 2018. "A Study of Supply Chain Risk in the Brazilian Wind Power Projects by Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Kent D Miller, 1992. "A Framework for Integrated Risk Management in International Business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 23(2), pages 311-331, June.
    5. Tianming Gao & Vasilii Erokhin & Aleksandr Arskiy, 2019. "Dynamic Optimization of Fuel and Logistics Costs as a Tool in Pursuing Economic Sustainability of a Farm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Mulhall, Rachel Ann & Bryson, John R., 2014. "Energy price risk and the sustainability of demand side supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 327-334.
    7. Rajesh Attri & Sandeep Grover, 2017. "Modelling the quality enabled factors of facility layout design stage of production system life cycle," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(1), pages 413-423, January.
    8. Cheng-Hsien Hsieh, 2014. "Disaster risk assessment of ports based on the perspective of vulnerability," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 851-864, November.
    9. Klassen, Robert D. & Vereecke, Ann, 2012. "Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 103-115.
    10. Awasthi, Anjali & Govindan, Kannan & Gold, Stefan, 2018. "Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 106-117.
    11. Yasuhide Okuyama & Joost R. Santos, 2014. "Disaster Impact And Input--Output Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Seongtae Kim & Stephan M. Wagner & Claudia Colicchia, 2019. "The Impact of Supplier Sustainability Risk on Shareholder Value," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 55(1), pages 71-87, January.
    13. Xiaoyan Jiang & Kun Lu & Bo Xia & Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui, 2019. "Identifying Significant Risks and Analyzing Risk Relationship for Construction PPP Projects in China Using Integrated FISM-MICMAC Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-31, September.
    14. Rajesh Attri & Sandeep Grover, 2017. "Analysis of quality enabled factors of production planning system stage of production system life cycle using interpretive structural modelling approach," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(1), pages 22-41.
    15. Frank Krysiak, 2009. "Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 483-492, April.
    16. Simas, Moana & Pacca, Sergio, 2014. "Assessing employment in renewable energy technologies: A case study for wind power in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 83-90.
    17. Yung-Hsin Lee & Shui-Lien Chen, 2019. "Effect of Green Attributes Transparency on WTA for Green Cosmetics: Mediating Effects of CSR and Green Brand Concepts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Konrad Zimmer & Magnus Fröhling & Frank Schultmann, 2016. "Sustainable supplier management -- a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 1412-1442, March.
    19. Sara Hajmohammad & Stephan Vachon, 2016. "Mitigation, Avoidance, or Acceptance? Managing Supplier Sustainability Risk," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 48-65, April.
    20. B Ritchie & C Brindley, 2007. "An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(11), pages 1398-1411, November.
    21. Anish Kumar & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Pradeep Kumar & Stavros Karamperidis, 2020. "Challenges in perishable food supply chains for sustainability management: A developing economy perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1809-1831, July.
    22. Christian Busse, 2016. "Doing Well by Doing Good? The Self-interest of Buying Firms and Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(2), pages 28-47, April.
    23. Giannakis, Mihalis & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 455-470.
    24. Li, Wing-Yan & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chow, Pui-Sze, 2015. "Risk and benefits brought by formal sustainability programs on fashion enterprises under market disruption," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 348-353.
    25. Blome, Constantin & Schoenherr, Tobias, 2011. "Supply chain risk management in financial crises--A multiple case-study approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 43-57, November.
    26. Hannes Hofmann & Christian Busse & Christoph Bode & Michael Henke, 2014. "Sustainability‐Related Supply Chain Risks: Conceptualization and Management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 160-172, March.
    27. Zhihong Wang & Joseph Sarkis, 2013. "Investigating the relationship of sustainable supply chain management with corporate financial performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 62(8), pages 871-888, October.
    28. Sara Bom & Helena Margarida Ribeiro & Joana Marto, 2020. "Sustainability Calculator: A Tool to Assess Sustainability in Cosmetic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    29. Zakeri, Atefe & Dehghanian, Farzad & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Carbon pricing versus emissions trading: A supply chain planning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 197-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. André Luiz Romano & Luis Miguel D. F. Ferreira, 2023. "How to transform sustainability practices into organizational benefits? The role of different cultural characteristics," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 192-208, March.
    2. Camelia Grădinaru & Daniel-Rareș Obadă & Ioan-Alexandru Grădinaru & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Enhancing Sustainable Cosmetics Brand Purchase: A Comprehensive Approach Based on the SOR Model and the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manel Elmsalmi & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid, 2021. "Prioritization of the Best Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management Practices Using a Structural Analysis Based-Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Neungho Han & Juneho Um, 2024. "Risk management strategy for supply chain sustainability and resilience capability," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Julia Hartmann & Sebastian Forkmann & Sabine Benoit & Stephan C. Henneberg, 2022. "A consumer perspective on managing the consequences of chain liability," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(4), pages 58-89, October.
    4. Giannakis, Mihalis & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 455-470.
    5. Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Claudia Colicchia & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2858-2886, November.
    6. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    7. Munir, Manal & Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Deniz Köksal & Jochen Strähle, 2021. "Social Sustainability in Fashion Supply Chains—Understanding Social Standard Implementation Failures in Vietnam and Indonesia Using Agency Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-36, February.
    9. Elena Fedorova & Kirsi Aaltonen & Eva Pongrácz, 2020. "Social Sustainability Dilemma: Escape or Communicate? Managing Social Risks Upstream of the Bioenergy Supply Chain," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Wen-Kuo Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Suresh Ma & Mei-Min Lin & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "An Exploration of the Critical Risk Factors in Sustainable Telecom Services: An Analysis of Indian Telecom Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Lingxuan Liu & Min Zhang & Linda C. Hendry & Maoliang Bu & Shi Wang, 2018. "Supplier Development Practices for Sustainability: A Multi‐Stakeholder Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 100-116, January.
    12. Soumyatanu Mukherjee & Sidhartha S. Padhi, 2022. "Sourcing decision under interconnected risks: an application of mean–variance preferences approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1243-1268, June.
    13. Vivek Soundararajan & Miriam M. Wilhelm & Andrew Crane, 2021. "Humanizing Research on Working Conditions in Supply Chains: Building a Path to Decent Work," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(2), pages 3-13, April.
    14. Amulya Gurtu & Jestin Johny, 2021. "Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Singh, Nitya P. & Hong, Paul C., 2020. "Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 723-735.
    16. Dongsheng Zhang & Hongwei Wang & Wenfu Wang, 2022. "The Influence of Relational Capital on the Sustainability Risk: Findings from Chinese Non-State-Owned Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Li, Gang & Fan, Huan & Lee, Peter K.C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 83-94.
    18. Mani, Venkatesh & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Mani, Kavitha T.N., 2020. "Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    19. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    20. Mahdi Bashiri & Benny Tjahjono & Jordon Lazell & Jennifer Ferreira & Tomy Perdana, 2021. "The Dynamics of Sustainability Risks in the Global Coffee Supply Chain: A Case of Indonesia–UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13771-:d:701682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.