IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13159-d689545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Component-Based Model for Building Material Stock and Waste-Flow Characterization: A Case in the Île-de-France Region

Author

Listed:
  • Rafaela Tirado

    (Scientific and Technical Centre for Buildings (CSTB), University Paris-Est, 24 Rue Joseph Fourier, 38400 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France
    Sustainable Construction Department, IBI, ETH Zurich, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Adélaïde Aublet

    (Scientific and Technical Centre for Buildings (CSTB), University Paris-Est, 24 Rue Joseph Fourier, 38400 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France)

  • Sylvain Laurenceau

    (Scientific and Technical Centre for Buildings (CSTB), University Paris-Est, 24 Rue Joseph Fourier, 38400 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France)

  • Mathieu Thorel

    (Scientific and Technical Centre for Buildings (CSTB), University Paris-Est, 24 Rue Joseph Fourier, 38400 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France)

  • Mathilde Louërat

    (Scientific and Technical Centre for Buildings (CSTB), University Paris-Est, 24 Rue Joseph Fourier, 38400 Saint-Martin-d’Hères, France)

  • Guillaume Habert

    (Sustainable Construction Department, IBI, ETH Zurich, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Building demolition is one of the main sources of waste generation in urban areas and is a growing problem for cities due to the generated environmental impacts. To promote high levels of circular economy, it is necessary to better understand the waste-flow composition; nevertheless, material flow studies typically focus on low levels of detail. This article presents a model based on a bottom-up macro-component approach, which allows the multiscale characterization of construction materials and the estimation of demolition waste flows, a model that we call the BTP-flux model. Data mining, analytical techniques, and geographic information system (GIS) tools were used to assess different datasets available at the national level and develop a common database for French buildings: BDNB. Generic information for buildings in the BDNB is then enriched by coupling every building with a catalog of macro-components (TyPy), thus allowing the building’s physical description. Subsequently, stock and demolition flows are calculated by aggregation and classified into 32 waste categories. The BTP-flux model was applied in Île-de-France in a sample of 101,320 buildings for residential and non-residential uses, representative of the assessed population (1,968,242 buildings). In the case of Île-de-France, the building stock and the total demolition flows were estimated at 1382 Mt and 4065 kt, respectively. For its inter-regional areas—departments—, stock and demolition waste can vary between 85 and 138 tons/cap and 0.263 and 0.486 tons/cap/year, respectively. The mean of the total demolition wastes was estimated at 0.33 tons/cap/year for the region. Results could encourage scientists, planners, and stakeholders to develop pathways towards a circular economy in the construction sector by implementing strategies for better management of waste recovery and reintegrating in economic circuits, while preserving a maximum of their added value.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafaela Tirado & Adélaïde Aublet & Sylvain Laurenceau & Mathieu Thorel & Mathilde Louërat & Guillaume Habert, 2021. "Component-Based Model for Building Material Stock and Waste-Flow Characterization: A Case in the Île-de-France Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-34, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13159-:d:689545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingming Hu & Ester Van Der Voet & Gjalt Huppes, 2010. "Dynamic Material Flow Analysis for Strategic Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Beijing," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(3), pages 440-456, June.
    2. Georg Schiller & Alessio Miatto & Karin Gruhler & Regine Ortlepp & Clemens Deilmann & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2019. "Transferability of Material Composition Indicators for Residential Buildings: A Conceptual Approach Based on a German‐Japanese Comparison," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(4), pages 796-807, August.
    3. Hiroki Tanikawa & Tomer Fishman & Keijiro Okuoka & Kenji Sugimoto, 2015. "The Weight of Society Over Time and Space: A Comprehensive Account of the Construction Material Stock of Japan, 1945–2010," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(5), pages 778-791, October.
    4. van der Voet, Ester & Kleijn, Rene & Huele, Ruben & Ishikawa, Masanobu & Verkuijlen, Evert, 2002. "Predicting future emissions based on characteristics of stocks," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 223-234, May.
    5. Vincent Augiseau & Eunhye Kim, 2021. "Inflows and Outflows from Material Stocks of Buildings and Networks and their Space-Differentiated Drivers: The Case Study of the Paris Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Mastrucci, Alessio & Marvuglia, Antonino & Leopold, Ulrich & Benetto, Enrico, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of building stocks from urban to transnational scales: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 316-332.
    7. Augiseau, Vincent & Barles, Sabine, 2017. "Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 153-164.
    8. Georg Schiller & Karin Gruhler & Regine Ortlepp, 2017. "Continuous Material Flow Analysis Approach for Bulk Nonmetallic Mineral Building Materials Applied to the German Building Sector," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 673-688, June.
    9. Zhi Cao & Lei Shen & Shuai Zhong & Litao Liu & Hanxiao Kong & Yanzhi Sun, 2018. "A Probabilistic Dynamic Material Flow Analysis Model for Chinese Urban Housing Stock," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(2), pages 377-391, April.
    10. Schiller, Georg & Müller, Felix & Ortlepp, Regine, 2017. "Mapping the anthropogenic stock in Germany: Metabolic evidence for a circular economy," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 93-107.
    11. Georg Schiller & Tamara Bimesmeier & Anh T.V. Pham, 2020. "Method for Quantifying Supply and Demand of Construction Minerals in Urban Regions—A Case Study of Hanoi and Its Hinterland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Sabine Barles, 2009. "Urban Metabolism of Paris and Its Region," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(6), pages 898-913, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruirui Zhang & Jing Guo & Dong Yang & Hiroaki Shirakawa & Feng Shi & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2022. "What matters most to the material intensity coefficient of buildings? Random forest‐based evidence from China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1809-1823, October.
    2. Benjamin Sprecher & Teun Johannes Verhagen & Marijn Louise Sauer & Michel Baars & John Heintz & Tomer Fishman, 2022. "Material intensity database for the Dutch building stock: Towards Big Data in material stock analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 272-280, February.
    3. Keisuke Yoshida & Keijiro Okuoka & Alessio Miatto & Liselotte Schebek & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2019. "Estimation of Mining and Landfilling Activities with Associated Overburden through Satellite Data: Germany 2000–2010," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Dong Yang & Mengyuan Dang & Lingwen Sun & Feng Han & Feng Shi & Hongbo Zhang & Hongjun Zhang, 2021. "A System Dynamics Model for Urban Residential Building Stock towards Sustainability: The Case of Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Yupeng Liu & Jiajia Li & Wei‐Qiang Chen & Lulu Song & Shaoqing Dai, 2022. "Quantifying urban mass gain and loss by a GIS‐based material stocks and flows analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1051-1060, June.
    6. Georg Schiller & Tamara Bimesmeier & Anh T.V. Pham, 2020. "Method for Quantifying Supply and Demand of Construction Minerals in Urban Regions—A Case Study of Hanoi and Its Hinterland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Jakob Lederer & Johann Fellner & Andreas Gassner & Karin Gruhler & Georg Schiller, 2021. "Determining the material intensities of buildings selected by random sampling: A case study from Vienna," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 848-863, August.
    8. Ling Zhang & Qingqing Lu & Zengwei Yuan & Songyan Jiang & Huijun Wu, 2023. "A bottom‐up modeling of metabolism of the residential building system in China toward 2050," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 587-600, April.
    9. Augiseau, Vincent & Barles, Sabine, 2017. "Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 153-164.
    10. Alessio Miatto & Claudia Sartori & Martina Bianchi & Paolo Borin & Andrea Giordano & Shoshanna Saxe & T.E. Graedel, 2022. "Tracking the material cycle of Italian bricks with the aid of building information modeling," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 609-626, April.
    11. Volk, Rebekka & Müller, Richard & Reinhardt, Joachim & Schultmann, Frank, 2019. "An Integrated Material Flows, Stakeholders and Policies Approach to Identify and Exploit Regional Resource Potentials," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 292-320.
    12. Virág, Doris & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Baumgart, André & Matej, Sarah & Krausmann, Fridolin & Min, Jihoon & Rao, Narasimha D. & Haberl, Helmut, 2022. "How much infrastructure is required to support decent mobility for all? An exploratory assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    13. Charles Gillott & Will Mihkelson & Maud Lanau & Dave Cheshire & Danielle Densley Tingley, 2023. "Developing Regenerate: A circular economy engagement tool for the assessment of new and existing buildings," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 423-435, April.
    14. Yupeng Liu & Wei-Qiang Chen & Tao Lin & Lijie Gao, 2019. "How Spatial Analysis Can Help Enhance Material Stocks and Flows Analysis?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, March.
    15. Claudio Zandonella Callegher & Gianluca Grazieschi & Eric Wilczynski & Ulrich Filippi Oberegger & Simon Pezzutto, 2023. "Assessment of Building Materials in the European Residential Building Stock: An Analysis at EU27 Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Babak Ebrahimi & Leonardo Rosado & Holger Wallbaum, 2022. "Machine learning‐based stocks and flows modeling of road infrastructure," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 44-57, February.
    17. Franz Schug & David Frantz & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Helmut Haberl & Doris Virág & Sebastian van der Linden & Patrick Hostert, 2023. "High‐resolution mapping of 33 years of material stock and population growth in Germany using Earth Observation data," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 110-124, February.
    18. Yang, Jingjing & Deng, Zhang & Guo, Siyue & Chen, Yixing, 2023. "Development of bottom-up model to estimate dynamic carbon emission for city-scale buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    19. Zhou, Yucheng & Yang, Ning & Hu, Shanying, 2013. "Industrial metabolism of PVC in China: A dynamic material flow analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 33-40.
    20. Miatto, Alessio & Schandl, Heinz & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Krausmann, Fridolin & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2017. "Modeling material flows and stocks of the road network in the United States 1905–2015," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 168-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13159-:d:689545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.