IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12705-d680932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Economic Theory, Presented in Basic Academic Textbooks, Applicable to the Digital Economy?

Author

Listed:
  • Vujica Lazovic

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Biljana Rondovic

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Danijela Lazovic

    (Central Bank of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

  • Tamara Djurickovic

    (Agency for Control and Quality Assurance of Higher Education, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro)

Abstract

With the aim of improving modern methods for educating economists, the authors in this paper impose the following topics: What do we want to teach students, and do we teach them the right things? How transformative are our fundamental textbook bases to offer the new knowledge that the digital economy imposes? Bearing in mind previous questions, the aim of this paper is to highlight the gap that exists between economic theory and economic practice in terms of insufficient theoretical scope of the digital economy (DE) and its study, and DE’s increasing participation in global practice as an economy based on innovation and new technologies. In the analysis, the authors concentrate on two levels: (1) they analyse the specifics of DE and in that context, they evaluate the applicability of traditional economic theory; (2) they review the representation of DE in university textbooks. Based on the results, the authors conclude that DE possesses specific attributes, and it is necessary to include these as mandatory lessons in university textbooks on the level of basic studies. They suggest some areas for which economic theory should be better explained and supplemented in future research (proposing appropriate guidelines for future efforts in theoretical work). Moreover, through a systematic literature review, the authors approach 90 basic university textbooks in economics and by analysing their content, they prove that DE is not sufficiently represented in them. The results of the paper suggest that economics textbooks, and thus the curricula of basic studies, should be supplemented with chapters on the digital economy, which will affect the modernization and adequacy of theory with practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Vujica Lazovic & Biljana Rondovic & Danijela Lazovic & Tamara Djurickovic, 2021. "Is Economic Theory, Presented in Basic Academic Textbooks, Applicable to the Digital Economy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12705-:d:680932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12705/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12705/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davidson,Lawrence S. & Hauskrecht,Andreas & von Hagen,Jürgen, 2020. "Macroeconomics for Business," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108470858.
    2. Dixit, Avinash, 2014. "Microeconomics: A Very Short Introduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199689378.
    3. Robert J. Gordon, 2000. "Does the "New Economy" Measure Up to the Great Inventions of the Past?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 49-74, Fall.
    4. Burda, Michael & Wyplosz, Charles, 2017. "Macroeconomics: a European Text," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 7, number 9780198737513, Decembrie.
    5. Poul Thøis Madsen, 2013. "The Financial Crisis and Principles of Economics Textbooks," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 197-216, September.
    6. Hoover,Kevin D., 2015. "Applied Intermediate Macroeconomics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107436824.
    7. Ayoub Yousefi, 2011. "The impact of information and communication technology on economic growth: evidence from developed and developing countries," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 581-596, November.
    8. David Colander, 2015. "Why economics textbooks should, but don't, and won't, change," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 229-235, September.
    9. John Quiggin, 2014. "National accounting and the digital economyy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 136-142.
    10. McKenzie,Richard B. & Lee,Dwight R., 2020. "Microeconomics for MBAs," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108747660.
    11. Rinaldo Evangelista & Paolo Guerrieri & Valentina Meliciani, 2014. "The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 802-824, November.
    12. Watanabe, Chihiro & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2018. "A new paradox of the digital economy - Structural sources of the limitation of GDP statistics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 9-23.
    13. Jane S. Lopus & Lynn Paringer, 2011. "The Principles of Economics Textbook: Content Coverage and Usage," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 28, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
    15. Derek Pyne, 2007. "Does the Choice of Introductory Microeconomics Textbook Matter?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 279-296, July.
    16. Watanabe, Chihiro & Naveed, Kashif & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2018. "Measuring GDP in the digital economy: Increasing dependence on uncaptured GDP," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 226-240.
    17. William D. Ferguson, 2011. "Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century: Recent Advances in Economic Theory and Undergraduate Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 31-50, January.
    18. Rosemarie Fike & James Gwartney, 2015. "Public Choice, Market Failure, and Government Failure in Principles Textbooks," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 207-218, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vujica Lazović & Milorad Jovović & Tamara Backović & Tamara Djuričković & Biljana Rondović, 2022. "Is Digital Economy a Good Samaritan to Developing Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vujica Lazović & Milorad Jovović & Tamara Backović & Tamara Djuričković & Biljana Rondović, 2022. "Is Digital Economy a Good Samaritan to Developing Countries?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Tou, Yuji & Watanabe, Chihiro & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2020. "Fusion of technology management and financing management - Amazon's transformative endeavor by orchestrating techno-financing systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Watanabe, Chihiro & Naveed, Nasir & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2019. "Digitalized bioeconomy: Planned obsolescence-driven circular economy enabled by Co-Evolutionary coupling," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 8-30.
    4. Tou, Yuji & Watanabe, Chihiro & Moriya, Kuniko & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2019. "Harnessing soft innovation resources leads to neo open innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Edgar Ortiz & Miriam Sosa & Héctor Díaz, 2015. "Educational Levels and the Impact of ICT on Economic Growth: Evidence of a Cointegrated Panel," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 5(9), pages 15-30, September.
    6. M.A. Afonasova & E.E. Panfilova & M.A. Galichkina, 2018. "Social and Economic Background of Digital Economy: Conditions for Transition," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 292-302.
    7. Tou, Yuji & Watanabe, Chihiro & Moriya, Kuniko & Naveed, Nasir & Vurpillat, Victor & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2019. "The transformation of R&D into neo open innovation- a new concept in R&D endeavor triggered by amazon," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Edgar Ortiz & Miriam Sosa & Héctor Díaz, 2015. "Educational Levels and the Impact of ICT on Economic Growth: Evidence of a Cointegrated Panel," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(9), pages 15-30, September.
    9. Jane E. Ihrig & Scott A. Wolla, 2020. "Let's Close the Gap: Revising Teaching Materials to Reflect How the Federal Reserve Implements Monetary Policy," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2020-092, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    10. Naveed, Nasir & Watanabe, Chihiro & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2020. "Co-evolutionary coupling leads a way to a novel concept of R&D - Lessons from digitalized bioeconomy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Watanabe, Chihiro & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2020. "Institutional systems inducing R&D in Amazon- the role of an investor surplus toward stakeholder capitalization," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Lucian Croitoru, 2016. "Are We Systematically Wrong when Estimating Potential Output and the Natural Rate of Interest?," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 128-151, June.
    14. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    15. Karl Whelan, 2002. "Computers, Obsolescence, And Productivity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(3), pages 445-461, August.
    16. Ahn, Sanghoon, 2003. "Technology Upgrading with Learning Cost," CEI Working Paper Series 2003-21, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    17. Jonathan Temple, 2002. "The Assessment: The New Economy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 241-264.
    18. Hashmat Khan & Marjorie Santos, 2002. "Contribution of ICT Use to Output and Labour-Productivity Growth in Canada," Staff Working Papers 02-7, Bank of Canada.
    19. Schmid, Andreas, 2007. "Incentive Compatibility and Efficiency in the contractual Insurer-Provider Relationship: Economic Theory and practical Implications: The Case of North Carolina," MPRA Paper 23311, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    20. Orlando Gomes, 2007. "Investment in organizational capital," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 107-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12705-:d:680932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.