IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p12286-d673916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Access to Secondary HSR Stations in the Urban Periphery: A Generalised Cost-Based Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Romero

    (Transport Research Centre (TRANSyT-UPM), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Transport Engineering, Regional and Urban Planning, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Clara Zamorano

    (Department of Transport Engineering, Regional and Urban Planning, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Emilio Ortega

    (Transport Research Centre (TRANSyT-UPM), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Forest and Environmental Engineering and Management, MONTES (School of Forest Engineering and Natural Resources), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Belén Martín

    (Transport Research Centre (TRANSyT-UPM), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Forest and Environmental Engineering and Management, MONTES (School of Forest Engineering and Natural Resources), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Investments in high-speed rail (HSR) development contribute to reducing regional disparities and improving territorial cohesion. When studying the efficacy of HSR investments, the travel time (and effort) spent on getting to and from the HSR station is crucial. In large urban areas there may be more than one station, and a peripheral station may complement the central stations and become a powerful vector for development. The rationale of this paper revolves around the possibility of applying a methodology based on generalised cost (GC) functions to study the advantages of new HSR-related projects in different locations. With this aim, we evaluate a real example in Seville (Spain) to determine whether the improvement in metropolitan accessibility to HSR services justifies the implementation of a new peripheral station, using a methodology to assess the territorial accessibility based on GC functions and modal travel times obtained with GIS methods, followed by an economic assessment based on a cost-benefit analysis. The paper ends with the main conclusions and a discussion of the methodology applied, the reductions in generalised costs resulting from the new station, the relevance of the case study, the limitations of the approach and further research stemming from this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Romero & Clara Zamorano & Emilio Ortega & Belén Martín, 2021. "Access to Secondary HSR Stations in the Urban Periphery: A Generalised Cost-Based Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12286-:d:673916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vickerman, Roger, 2015. "High-speed rail and regional development: the case of intermediate stations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 157-165.
    2. Cascetta, Ennio & Coppola, Pierluigi, 2016. "Assessment of schedule-based and frequency-based assignment models for strategic and operational planning of high-speed rail services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 93-108.
    3. Casello, Jeffrey M., 2007. "Transit competitiveness in polycentric metropolitan regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 19-40, January.
    4. Karst T. Geurs & Roberto Patuelli & Tomaz Ponce Dentinho (ed.), 2016. "Accessibility, Equity and Efficiency," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16534.
    5. Andrés Monzón & Emilio Ortega & Elena López, 2016. "Influence of the first and last mile on HSR accessibility levels," Chapters, in: Karst T. Geurs & Roberto Patuelli & Tomaz Ponce Dentinho (ed.), Accessibility, Equity and Efficiency, chapter 7, pages 125-143, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Garcia-Martinez, Andres & Cascajo, Rocio & Jara-Diaz, Sergio R. & Chowdhury, Subeh & Monzon, Andres, 2018. "Transfer penalties in multimodal public transport networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 52-66.
    7. Martínez Sánchez-Mateos, Héctor S. & Givoni, Moshe, 2012. "The accessibility impact of a new High-Speed Rail line in the UK – a preliminary analysis of winners and losers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 105-114.
    8. Beria, Paolo & Grimaldi, Raffaele & Albalate, Daniel & Bel, Germà, 2018. "Delusions of success: Costs and demand of high-speed rail in Italy and Spain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 63-79.
    9. Marcus Young & Simon Blainey, 2018. "Railway station choice modelling: a review of methods and evidence," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 232-251, March.
    10. Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani, 2012. "Accessibility analysis and transport planning: an introduction," Chapters, in: Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani (ed.), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning, chapter 1, pages 1-12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Vigren, Andreas & Ljungberg, Anders, 2018. "Public Transport Authorities’ use of Cost-Benefit Analysis in practice," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 560-567.
    12. Zhang, Wenxin & Nian, Peihao & Lyu, Guowei, 2016. "A multimodal approach to assessing accessibility of a high-speed railway station," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 91-101.
    13. Inmaculada Mohino & Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris & José María Urena, 2014. "Impacts of High-Speed Rail on Metropolitan Integration: An Examination of London, Madrid and Paris," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3-4), pages 306-334, November.
    14. Bardal, Kjersti Granås, 2020. "Contradictory outcomes of cost-benefit analyses – Findings from Norwegian public-investment projects," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Desmaris, Christian & Croccolo, Fabio, 2018. "The HSR competition in Italy: How are the regulatory design and practices concerned?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 290-299.
    16. Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani (ed.), 2012. "Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14718.
    17. Moyano, Amparo & Moya-Gómez, Borja & Gutiérrez, Javier, 2018. "Access and egress times to high-speed rail stations: a spatiotemporal accessibility analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 84-93.
    18. Mackie, Peter & Worsley, Tom & Eliasson, Jonas, 2014. "Transport appraisal revisited," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 3-18.
    19. Jaime Jover & Ibán Díaz-Parra, 2020. "Gentrification, transnational gentrification and touristification in Seville, Spain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3044-3059, November.
    20. Karel Martens & Floridea Di Ciommo, 2017. "Travel time savings, accessibility gains and equity effects in cost–benefit analysis," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 152-169, March.
    21. Fadaei, Masoud & Cats, Oded, 2016. "Evaluating the impacts and benefits of public transport design and operational measures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 105-116.
    22. Givoni, Moshe & Rietveld, Piet, 2014. "Do cities deserve more railway stations? The choice of a departure railway station in a multiple-station region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 89-97.
    23. Ortega, Emilio & López, Elena & Monzón, Andrés, 2012. "Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 130-141.
    24. Repolho, Hugo M. & Church, Richard L. & Antunes, António P., 2016. "Optimizing station location and fleet composition for a high-speed rail line," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 437-452.
    25. Brons, Martijn & Givoni, Moshe & Rietveld, Piet, 2009. "Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 136-149, February.
    26. Moshe Givoni, 2006. "Development and Impact of the Modern High‐speed Train: A Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 593-611, January.
    27. Feng Zhen & Xinyu Cao & Jia Tang, 2019. "The role of access and egress in passenger overall satisfaction with high speed rail," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2137-2150, December.
    28. Wardman, Mark & Chintakayala, V. Phani K. & de Jong, Gerard, 2016. "Values of travel time in Europe: Review and meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 93-111.
    29. Givoni, Moshe & Banister, David, 2012. "Speed: the less important element of the High-Speed Train," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 306-307.
    30. Sung, Hyungun & Choi, Keechoo & Lee, Sugie & Cheon, SangHyun, 2014. "Exploring the impacts of land use by service coverage and station-level accessibility on rail transit ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 134-140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moyano, Amparo & Moya-Gómez, Borja & Gutiérrez, Javier, 2018. "Access and egress times to high-speed rail stations: a spatiotemporal accessibility analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 84-93.
    2. Daniel Albalate & Germá Bel, 2015. "La experiencia internacional en alta velocidad ferroviaria," Working Papers 2015-02, FEDEA.
    3. Dominique Bouf & Christian Desmaris, 2020. "Spatial equity and high speed trains: the example of France," Post-Print halshs-01137902, HAL.
    4. Xiaomin Wang & Wenxin Zhang, 2019. "Efficiency and Spatial Equity Impacts of High-Speed Rail on the Central Plains Economic Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Zheng, Longfei & Long, Fenjie & Chang, Zheng & Ye, Jingsong, 2019. "Ghost town or city of hope? The spatial spillover effects of high-speed railway stations in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 230-241.
    6. Dominique Bouf & Christian Desmaris, 2015. "High speed trains and spatial equity in France [Trains à grande vitesse et équité spatiale en France]," Working Papers halshs-01194897, HAL.
    7. Huang, Yan & Zong, Huiming, 2020. "The spatial distribution and determinants of China’s high-speed train services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-70.
    8. Xu, Minhao & Shuai, Bin & Wang, Xin & Liu, Hongyi & Zhou, Hui, 2023. "Analysis of the accessibility of connecting transport at High-speed rail stations from the perspective of departing passengers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Martín, Belén & Ortega, Emilio & de Isidro, Ágata & Iglesias-Merchan, Carlos, 2021. "Improvements in high-speed rail network environmental evaluation and planning: An assessment of accessibility gains and landscape connectivity costs in Spain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Taotao Deng & Chen Gan & Yukun Hu, 2021. "Do hotel business benefit from increased tourist accessibility? Evidence from China’s high-speed railway program," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1357-1374, November.
    11. Marti-Henneberg, Jordi, 2015. "Attracting travellers to the high-speed train: a methodology for comparing potential demand between stations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 145-156.
    12. Zhao, Yun & Yu, Hongbo, 2018. "A door-to-door travel time approach for evaluating modal competition of intercity travel: A focus on the proposed Dallas-Houston HSR route," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 13-22.
    13. Borsati, Mattia & Albalate, Daniel, 2020. "On the modal shift from motorway to high-speed rail: evidence from Italy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 145-164.
    14. Tanaka, Koichi, 2023. "Impacts of the opening of the maglev railway on daily accessibility in Japan: A comparative analysis with that of the Shinkansen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Xu, Wangtu (Ato) & Zhou, Jiangping & Qiu, Guo, 2018. "China's high-speed rail network construction and planning over time: a network analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 40-54.
    16. Mohsen Momenitabar & Zhila Dehdari Ebrahimi & Mohammad Arani, 2020. "A Systematic and Analytical Review of the Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact of the Deployed High-Speed Rail (HSR) Systems on the World," Papers 2003.04452, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    17. Beria, Paolo & Debernardi, Andrea & Ferrara, Emanuele, 2017. "Measuring the long-distance accessibility of Italian cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 66-79.
    18. Wang, Lei, 2018. "High-speed rail services development and regional accessibility restructuring in megaregions: A case of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 34-44.
    19. Liang, Yutian & Zhou, Keyang & Li, Xun & Zhou, Zhengke & Sun, Wei & Zeng, Jiaqi, 2020. "Effectiveness of high-speed railway on regional economic growth for less developed areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Jia, Shanming & Zhou, Chunyu & Qin, Chenglin, 2017. "No difference in effect of high-speed rail on regional economic growth based on match effect perspective?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 144-157.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:12286-:d:673916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.