IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10561-d641527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecology Projects and Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizens’ Support

Author

Listed:
  • Sergiu Gherghina

    (Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK)

  • Paul Tap

    (Department of International Studies and Contemporary History, Babes-Bolyai University Cluj, 400000 Cluj, Romania)

Abstract

In contemporary times, a large number of ecology projects are put on the public agenda through participatory budgeting. There is variation in the support they receive from citizens, but until now we have not known what drives this support. This article aims to identify the factors that could determine the support for ecology projects in participatory budgeting. It includes all 36 projects on ecology, which passed the technical eligibility check, submitted to the participatory budgeting in Cluj-Napoca (Romania) between 2017 and 2019. We use quantitative analysis to test the extent to which five project characteristics have an effect on the public support for the ecology projects: the requested budget, the type of project, the number of arguments, the use of jargon, and images and videos in addition to text descriptions. The results show that citizens take the environmental matters seriously and do not vote for schematic projects that are limited in scope and which have limited contribution to the general welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergiu Gherghina & Paul Tap, 2021. "Ecology Projects and Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizens’ Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10561-:d:641527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youngmin Oh & Seong-ho Jeong & Heontae Shin, 2019. "A Strategy for a Sustainable Local Government: Are Participatory Governments More Efficient, Effective, and Equitable in the Budget Process?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Patrycja Szarek-Iwaniuk & Adam Senetra, 2020. "Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. David Le Blanc, 2020. "E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends," Working Papers 163, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    4. Carole-Anne Sénit & Frank Biermann & Agni Kalfagianni, 2017. "The Representativeness of Global Deliberation: A Critical Assessment of Civil Society Consultations for Sustainable Development," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 62-72, February.
    5. Maria Isabel Brun-Martos & Irvine Lapsley, 2017. "Democracy, governmentality and transparency: participatory budgeting in action," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 1006-1021, August.
    6. Yves Sintomer & Carsten Herzberg & Anja Röcke, 2008. "Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 164-178, March.
    7. Sverker C. Jagers & Johan Martinsson & Simon Matti, 2016. "The Environmental Psychology of the Ecological Citizen: Comparing Competing Models of Pro-Environmental Behavior," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1005-1022, November.
    8. Seyed Hamid Mohammadi & Sharifah Norazizan & Hedayat Allah Nikkhah, 2018. "Conflicting perceptions on participation between citizens and members of local government," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1761-1778, July.
    9. Gary Bland, 2017. "Sustainability as a Measure of Success: Externally Promoted Participatory Budgeting in El Salvador 10 Years Later," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(2), pages 110-121, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Kołat & Marek Furmankiewicz & Magdalena Kalisiak-Mędelska, 2022. "What Are the Needs of City Dwellers in Terms of the Development of Public Spaces? A Case Study of Participatory Budgeting in Częstochowa, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Szczepańska & M. Zagroba & K. Pietrzyk, 2022. "Participatory Budgeting as a Method for Improving Public Spaces in Major Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 231-252, July.
    2. Katarzyna Kołat & Marek Furmankiewicz & Magdalena Kalisiak-Mędelska, 2022. "What Are the Needs of City Dwellers in Terms of the Development of Public Spaces? A Case Study of Participatory Budgeting in Częstochowa, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Patrycja Szarek-Iwaniuk & Adam Senetra, 2020. "Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Nejc Brezovar & Tatjana Stanimirovic, 2022. "Sustainability aspects of participatory budgeting at the municipal level in Slovenia," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 46(4), pages 569-589.
    5. Rasel Mpuya Madaha, 2020. "Can Local African Communities be Empowered through Participatory Budgeting?," International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(2), pages 74-93, June.
    6. Cuenca Botey, Luis Emilio & Célérier, Laure, 2023. "On the relentless labour of deconstructing domination logics: The case of decolonial critical accounting research in South America," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    8. Philipp Horn & Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Beth Chitekwe-Biti & Jack Makau, 2018. "Towards citywide participatory planning: emerging community-led practices in three African cities," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 342018, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    9. Capaccioli, Andrea & Poderi, Giacomo & Bettega, Mela & D'Andrea, Vincenzo, 2017. "Exploring participatory energy budgeting as a policy instrument to foster energy justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 621-630.
    10. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2022:y:2022:i:2:id:576 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Tom Henfrey & Giuseppe Feola & Gil Penha‐Lopes & Filka Sekulova & Ana Margarida Esteves, 2023. "Rethinking the sustainable development goals: Learning with and from community‐led initiatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 211-222, February.
    12. Carole-Anne Sénit, 2020. "Leaving no one behind? The influence of civil society participation on the Sustainable Development Goals," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(4), pages 693-712, June.
    13. repec:thr:techub:10034:y:2022:i:1:p:54-83 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Augsberger, Astraea & Collins, Mary Elizabeth & Gecker, Whitney & Lusk, Katharine & Zhao, Qianqian Jane, 2017. "“She treated us like we bring valid ideas to the table:” Youth experiences of a youth-led participatory budgeting process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 243-249.
    15. Anassaya Chawviang & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2022. "Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Giulio Mattiazzi & Vito Garramone & Lucia Lancerin & Francesco Musco, 2017. "Partecipazione pubblica in Veneto: verso una tecnologia dei processi decisionali," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 81-98.
    17. Chenyang Xiao & Jan Buhrmann, 2019. "Ideas to action: environmental beliefs, behaviors, and support for environmental policies," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 196-205, June.
    18. Bassel El Hajj & Georgiana Karadas & Pouya Zargar, 2023. "How E-Government Can Help Societies during a Crisis: Implications of UTAUT Model in Lebanon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Eva Tomaskova & Romana Buzkova, 2020. "Participatory Budgeting in Brno – Inspiration for Other Cities?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 758-770.
    20. Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Iwona Cieślak, 2022. "The Use of Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) for Evaluating Public Participation on the Example of Rural Municipalities in the Region of Warmia and Mazury," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    21. Dorota Bednarska-Olejniczak & Jarosław Olejniczak & Libuše Svobodová, 2019. "Towards a Smart and Sustainable City with the Involvement of Public Participation—The Case of Wroclaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-33, January.
    22. Kędra, Arleta & Maleszyk, Piotr & Visvizi, Anna, 2023. "Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10561-:d:641527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.