IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10487-d640102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political and Historical Determinants of the Differentiation of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems of Agritourism in Poland and Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Jan A. Wendt

    (Institute of Socio-Economic Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Gdansk University, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Sergey V. Pashkov

    (Department of Geography and Ecology, University of North Kazakhstan, Petropavlovsk 150000, Kazakhstan)

  • Elżbieta Mydłowska

    (Institute of Spatial Management and Socio-Economic Geography, University of Szczecin, 70-383 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezińska

    (Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

(1) Background: In the context of differences among countries developing pre-entrepreneurship ecosystems in relation to agritourism, the need to define the specific challenges and facilitators in the group of post-communist countries is recognised. Given that, we aim to examine the differences between the countries belonging to the former USSR and the satellite countries of the former USSR. (2) Methods: For the realisation of the intended objective, we analysed studies of the literature on the subject, in terms of the theoretical treatment of the entrepreneurial eco-system in the field of agritourism, and current legal acts. Our own observations from stays in the regions in question were also used, along with statistical methods concerning the density of the transport network, comparative analysis of historical and political conditions, and SWOT analysis. (3) Results: Substantial differences were found between the components of the agritourism entrepreneurship ecosystem in Poland and Kazakhstan, primarily related to the level of transport infrastructure density (satisfactory in West Pomeranian Voivodeship, insufficient in North Kazakhstan), tradition of individual farming (well established in Poland, poorly present in Kazakhstan), support for agritourism development by central and local authorities (relatively high in Poland, incidental and with a short history in Kazakhstan), and finally, differences in the target group of agritourism service recipients (stable in Poland, undefined in Kazakhstan). (4) Conclusions: The research leads to the conclusion of the heterogeneity of the determinants of the development of the agritourism entrepreneurship ecosystem in countries collectively defined as post-communist. There are clearly different challenges and facilitations resulting not so much from the past political system as from the ethnic-historical considerations, the position of agriculture in the economy, and the degree and effectiveness of the involvement of administrative authorities in the development of agritourism. The study leads to a recommendation on the need for more efficient targeting of agritourism consumers abroad.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan A. Wendt & Sergey V. Pashkov & Elżbieta Mydłowska & Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezińska, 2021. "Political and Historical Determinants of the Differentiation of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems of Agritourism in Poland and Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10487-:d:640102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfredo Monte & Luca Pennacchio, 2020. "Historical roots of regional entrepreneurship: the role of knowledge and creativity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Mariana Pita & Joana Costa & António Carrizo Moreira, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Entrepreneurial Initiative: Building a Multi-Country Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Lalita A. Manrai & Ajay K. Manrai & Dana-Nicoleta Lascu & David Dickerson, 2015. "Retail Developments in Poland, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine: A Comparative Analysis," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 14(1), pages 63-77, June.
    4. Alexander Libman & Anastassia Obydenkova, 2019. "Inequality and historical legacies: evidence from post-communist regions," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 699-724, November.
    5. Aliya AKTYMBAYEVA & Yeldar NURULY & Bakyt AKTYMBAYEVA & Gulzhan AIZHOLOVA, 2017. "Analysis of the Development of Modern Agritourism Types in West Kazakhstan Oblast," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 902-910.
    6. repec:zbw:iamodp:234476 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Łukasiewicz, Katarzyna, 2017. "Perspectives of Agritourism Development in Poland, Belarus and Ukraine," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 17(32, Part ), December.
    8. Robert J. Shiller & Maxim Boycko & Vladimir Korobov, 1992. "Hunting for Homo Sovieticus: Situational versus Attitudinal Factors in Economic Behavior," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 23(1), pages 127-194.
    9. Jeroen Content & Niels Bosma & Jacob Jordaan & Mark Sanders, 2020. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems, entrepreneurial activity and economic growth: new evidence from European regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 1007-1019, July.
    10. Asif Khan & Sughra Bibi & Ardito Lorenzo & Jiaying Lyu & Zaheer Udden Babar, 2020. "Tourism and Development in Developing Economies: A Policy Implication Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Michael Fritsch & David J. Storey, 2014. "Entrepreneurship in a Regional Context: Historical Roots, Recent Developments and Future Challenges," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 939-954, June.
    12. Almas Kuralbayev & Borash Myrzaliev & Burhan Sevim, 2016. "Organizational and Economic Problems in the Management of the Spiritual - Historical Development of Tourism in South Kazakhstan Region," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(2), pages 219-226.
    13. Jan A. Wendt & Vasile Grama & Gabriela Ilieş & Andrey S. Mikhaylov & Sorin G. Borza & Grigore Vasile Herman & Agnieszka Bógdał-Brzezińska, 2021. "Transport Infrastructure and Political Factors as Determinants of Tourism Development in the Cross-Border Region of Bihor and Maramureş. A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Piotr Prus, 2020. "Innovations in Agritourism: Evidence from a Region in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Erik Stam & Andrew Ven, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 809-832, February.
    16. Petrick, Martin & Pomfret, Richard, 2016. "Agricultural policies in Kazakhstan," IAMO Discussion Papers 234476, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    17. Aitolkyn TLEUBAYEVA, 2018. "Rural Tourism as One of the Priority Factors for Sustainable Development of Rural Territories in Kazakhstan," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(6), pages 1312-1326.
    18. repec:srs:journl:jemt:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:771-776 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Salvatore Ammirato & Alberto Michele Felicetti & Cinzia Raso & Bruno Antonio Pansera & Antonio Violi, 2020. "Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    20. O Banсerova & A Kasimova, 2018. "Formation of Ethnocultural Tourism Clusters in Russia Kazakhstan Borderline Territory," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(4), pages 771-776.
    21. Ramona Ciolac & Tiberiu Iancu & Ioan Brad & Tabita Adamov & Nicoleta Mateoc-Sîrb, 2021. "Agritourism—A Business Reality of the Moment for Romanian Rural Area’s Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pavel Dmitriyev & Ivan Fomin & Saltanat Ismagulova & Zharas Berdenov & Ivan Zuban & Kirill Ostrovnoy & Irina Golodova, 2023. "Study of the Possibility of Using the Bottom Organomineral Accumulations of the Lakes of the North Kazakhstan Region to Obtain Innovative Fertilizers for the Development of Organic Farming and Agrotou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, June.
    2. ElSayed A. Elnashar & Liliana Indrie & Dorina Camelia Ilieş & Zlatin Zlatev & Grigore Vasile Herman & Cristina Secan & Jan A. Wendt, 2022. "Rare Romanian Ethnographic Textiles—Reverse Engineering of Fabrics for Fashion Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Renata Anisiewicz, 2021. "Conditions for Development of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Tourism in the Border Area of the European Union: The Example of the Tri-Border Area of Poland–Belarus–Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Alfredo Monte & Sara Moccia & Luca Pennacchio, 2022. "Regional entrepreneurship and innovation: historical roots and the impact on the growth of regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 451-473, January.
    3. Gabriela Popescu & Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Ioan Brad & Elena Peț & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2022. "Sustainability through Rural Tourism in Moieciu Area-Development Analysis and Future Proposals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Schmidt, Claudia & Tian, Zheng & Goetz, Stephan J. & Chase, Lisa, 2022. "Drivers of Agritourism and Direct Sales Clusters in the United States," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322207, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Ramona Ciolac & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Andrea Feher & Sorin Stanciu, 2022. "Smart Tourist Village—An Entrepreneurial Necessity for Maramures Rural Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Hernández-Chea, Roberto & Mahdad, Maral & Minh, Thai Thi & Hjortsø, Carsten Nico, 2021. "Moving beyond intermediation: How intermediary organizations shape collaboration dynamics in entrepreneurial ecosystems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Francesco Perugini, 2023. "Space–time analysis of entrepreneurial ecosystems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 240-291, February.
    8. Bernd Wurth & Erik Stam & Ben Spigel, 2022. "Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 729-778, May.
    9. Mariana Pita & Joana Costa & António Carrizo Moreira, 2021. "Unveiling Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’ Transformation: A GEM Based Portrait," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Quoc Hoang Thai & Khuong Ngoc Mai & Tung Thanh Do, 2023. "An Evolution of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Studies: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    11. Maksim Belitski & Pınar Büyükbalci, 2021. "Uncharted waters of the entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Comparing Greater Istanbul and Reading ecosystems," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 727-750, June.
    12. Barbara Zanetti & Milena Verrascina & Francesco Licciardo & Giuseppe Gargano, 2022. "Agritourism and Farms Diversification in Italy: What Have We Learnt from COVID-19?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Theodoraki, Christina & Dana, Léo-Paul & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 346-360.
    14. Nebojša Stojčić & Korneliusz Pylak & Dubravka Jurlina Alibegović, 2022. "The spatial impact of entrepreneurial zones: firm, city and inter-city evidence," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 2164-2176, December.
    15. Xiaowen Jin & Hao Wu & Jing Zhang & Guangming He, 2021. "Agritourism Development in the USA: The Strategy of the State of Michigan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Maryam Mahmoodi & Michał Roman & Piotr Prus, 2022. "Features and Challenges of Agritourism: Evidence from Iran and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Jana Schmutzler & Veneta Andonova & Jonathan Perez-Lopez, 2021. "The role of diaspora in opportunity-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: A mixed-methods study of Balkan economies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 693-729, June.
    18. Zhao, Xin & Xu, Yong & Vasa, László & Shahzad, Umer, 2023. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem and urban innovation: Contextual findings in the lens of sustainable development from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Fanjul, Ana P. & Herrera, Liliana & Munoz-Doyague, Maria F., 2023. "Fostering rural entrepreneurship: An ex-post analysis for Spanish municipalities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Gloria Leonor Ortiz Morales & Juan Carlos Ramos Aguilar & Katherin Yineth Lozada Morales, 2022. "Culture as an obstacle for entrepreneurship," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10487-:d:640102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.