IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9670-d623723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of an Enterprise’s Intellectualization on Its Leadership Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Dahui Zhou

    (School of Business and Tourism Management, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Svetlana Danshina

    (Department of Propaedeutics of Dental Diseases, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 115201 Moscow, Russia)

  • Anastasia Kurilova

    (Department of Master’s Degree Programs (Business Programs), Togliatti State University, 445020 Togliatty, Russia)

  • Marcin Lis

    (Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University in Dabrowa Górnicza, Zygmunta Cieplaka 1c, 41-300 Dabrowa Górnicza, Poland)

Abstract

The intellectualization of medical companies is gaining special importance in modern conditions of sustainable development, including the minimization of coronavirus consequences. The study aims to form a methodological approach to assess the impact of enterprise intellectualization on the level of leadership potential in the context of stimulating its components. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of a system of factors for achieving leadership based on the intellectualization of Russian clinics, as well as the construction of a synergistic mechanism for combining factors with each other. The scientific contribution of the study is the proposed methodological toolkit for a comprehensive assessment of the impact of a company’s intellectualization on its leadership potential. It provides an opportunity to prioritize the management potential of skills, abilities, and capabilities in order to create a competitive advantage of an enterprise, achieve strategic goals, and form leadership positions in the market. Most of the studied companies were characterized by a lack of balance between leadership potential components in the context of intellectualization. Determining the level of leadership potential development based on companies’ intellectualization demonstrated that the level of qualifications determines the corresponding capabilities, which stimulate the development of a clinics’ personnel. The tested model of assessing the leadership potential of the studied companies’ personnel proves that intellectualization of general clinics influences their leadership potential. It also contributes to sustainable development in the context of actualizing their social component (namely, increased efficiency of medical services, their quality, and, accordingly, the level of health care in general).

Suggested Citation

  • Dahui Zhou & Svetlana Danshina & Anastasia Kurilova & Marcin Lis, 2021. "The Impact of an Enterprise’s Intellectualization on Its Leadership Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9670-:d:623723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9670/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9670/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shahrazad HADAD, 2017. "Knowledge Economy: Characteristics and Dimensions," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 203-225, June.
    2. Charnley, Susan & Carothers, Courtney & Satterfield, Terre & Levine, Arielle & Poe, Melissa R. & Norman, Karma & Donatuto, Jamie & Breslow, Sara Jo & Mascia, Michael B. & Levin, Phillip S. & Basurto, , 2017. "Evaluating the best available social science for natural resource management decision-making," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 80-88.
    3. Mykhailo Baimuratov & Inna Gryshova & Irina Akhmetova, 2018. "Leadership of Territorial Communities: Local and Global Factors," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Wadim Strielkowski & Oksana Chigisheva (ed.), Leadership for the Future Sustainable Development of Business and Education, pages 179-188, Springer.
    4. Mahmood, Tarique & Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat, 2020. "Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Myong-Hun An & Gyong-Yong Ri & Gwang-Nam Rim, 2020. "Intellectual Product and Method of Assessing the Competitiveness of an Enterprise with It," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1059-1085, September.
    6. Alžbeta Kucharčíková & Martin Mičiak & Miloš Hitka, 2018. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Investment in Human Capital in E-Business Enterprise in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Daniela PASNICU & Ghenadie CIOBANU, 2018. "Quality of Employment in Small and Medium Enterprises in Romania," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(1), pages 64-76, March.
    8. Francesco Polese & Antonio Botti & Mara Grimaldi & Antonella Monda & Massimiliano Vesci, 2018. "Social Innovation in Smart Tourism Ecosystems: How Technology and Institutions Shape Sustainable Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Yongfu Li & Yu Song & Jinxin Wang & Chengwei Li, 2019. "Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Rocio Rodriguez & Göran Svensson & David Eriksson, 2021. "Priorities Determining Future Directions of Sustainable Development in Business Models of the Healthcare Industry—Findings and Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-11, June.
    11. Zhengxin Wang & Minghuan Shou & Shuai Wang & Ruinan Dai & Keqian Wang, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Key Factors of Intelligent Upgrade of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Adesina, Kolade Sunday, 2019. "Bank technical, allocative and cost efficiencies in Africa: The influence of intellectual capital," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 419-433.
    13. Aleksy Kwilinski, 2018. "Mechanism of formation of industrial enterprise development strategy in the information economy," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 1(1), pages 7-25, October.
    14. Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & V. G. R. Chandran & Evelyn S. Devadason, 2018. "Measuring Human Capital in Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: What Matters?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 605-623, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Simonov Kusi‐Sarpong & Syed Imran Zaman & Syed Hasnain Alam Kazmi, 2021. "Social sustainable supply chains in the food industry: A perspective of an emerging economy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 404-418, January.
    2. Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat & Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed & Brown, Steve & Mubarak, Muhammad Faraz, 2022. "Intellectual capital, blockchain-driven supply chain and sustainable production: Role of supply chain mapping," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Ahmed, Adeel & Bhatti, Sabeen Hussain & Gölgeci, Ismail & Arslan, Ahmad, 2022. "Digital platform capability and organizational agility of emerging market manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of intellectual capital and the moderating role of environmental dynamism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Kyriaki Papadopoulou, 2020. "Comparative Review Of Performance Measurement Methods Effectiveness," Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 17(1), pages 127-139.
    6. Saqer Sulimas Al-Tahat & Alaa Jaber Matarneh & Osama Abdul Moneim Ali, 2019. "The Impact of the Intellectual Capital of the University Administration in Achieving the Quality of Education," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 137-154, February.
    7. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    8. Pasquale Del Vecchio & Gioconda Mele & Valentina Ndou & Giustina Secundo, 2018. "Open Innovation and Social Big Data for Sustainability: Evidence from the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Radosław Miśkiewicz, 2020. "Efficiency of Electricity Production Technology from Post-Process Gas Heat: Ecological, Economic and Social Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Evgeny V. Popov & Wadim Strielkowski & Maksim V. Vlasov, 2020. "Digitalization of intellectual activity in Russian regions," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 24-32, March.
    11. Juhani Ukko & Minna Saunila & Mina Nasiri & Tero Rantala, 2022. "The importance of sustainability engagement in small businesses supplier collaboration," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 1-9, February.
    12. Letizia Lo Presti & Mario Testa & Vittoria Marino & Pierpaolo Singer, 2019. "Engagement in Healthcare Systems: Adopting Digital Tools for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Saeid Alaei & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Unveiling the role of sustainable supply chain drivers toward knowledge-based economy via a novel permutation approach: implications from an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1231-1250, September.
    14. Anum Khan & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik, 2022. "Measuring the role of neurotransmitters in investment decision: A proposed constructs," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 258-274, January.
    15. Patrucco, Andrea S. & Marzi, Giacomo & Trabucchi, Daniel, 2023. "The role of absorptive capacity and big data analytics in strategic purchasing and supply chain management decisions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    16. Chia-Ying Li & Yu-Hui Fang & Badri Munir Sukoco, 2021. "Value proposition as a catalyst for innovative service experience: the case of smart-tourism destinations," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(2), pages 281-308, June.
    17. Patricia Janosova, 2021. "Sustainable activities in manufacturing enterprises: Consumers’ expectations," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 91-101, March.
    18. Monica Fait & Dirk Meissner & Gian Luca Gregori & Filippo Monge & Valentina Cillo, 2022. "To act or to react? The role of responsiveness in corporate social performance disclosure in preventing plastic pollution in the travel and tourism sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2065-2082, November.
    19. Camelia Oprean-Stan & Sebastian Stan & Vasile Brătian, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability and Intangible Resources Binomial: New Proposal on Intangible Resources Recognition and Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Ao Yu & Zhuoqiang Jia & Weike Zhang & Ke Deng & Francisco Herrera, 2020. "A Dynamic Credit Index System for TSMEs in China Using the Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9670-:d:623723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.