IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8893-d610986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Integration of Lean and Resilience Paradigms: A Systematic Review Identifying Current and Future Research Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Mahyar Habibi Rad

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Mohammad Mojtahedi

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Michael J. Ostwald

    (School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

Integration of the lean and resilience paradigms has attracted increasing attention among scientists and practitioners. In an interconnected world, the need to be resilient involves increased readiness to deal with risks from both outside and inside an enterprise, and to be lean involves maximizing value while minimizing waste. The combination of these requirements has been the catalyst for a move towards lean–resilience operations. To better understand this trend, which seeks to help firms retain a competitive position and survive disruptions, this paper provides a systematic literature review of 53 articles identified through the C-I-M-O (context-intervention-mechanism-outcome) framework and examines them using descriptive and content analysis. The results trace the growth of lean–resilience research from its infancy to its current advanced state. This paper also identifies for the first time the lack of structured research on the number and categories of implemented practices and their associated benefits. To address this deficiency, a concept map is developed to provide guidance on the topic, identify gaps and inconsistencies in the literature, understand the state of development and suggest future research directions. The results are used to identify four dominant streams: application, compatibility, integration, and impact assessment in the context of the supply chain, conceptual development and operational research of various organizational and industry sectors. Further topics for investigation are recommended in the form of research questions. The proposed concept map is intended to assist researchers and practitioners to develop knowledge about the integration of lean and resilience paradigms in new contexts and formulate more effective deployment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahyar Habibi Rad & Mohammad Mojtahedi & Michael J. Ostwald, 2021. "The Integration of Lean and Resilience Paradigms: A Systematic Review Identifying Current and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8893-:d:610986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Qi & Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 347-364.
    2. Zavitsas, Konstantinos & Zis, Thalis & Bell, Michael G.H., 2018. "The impact of flexible environmental policy on maritime supply chain resilience," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 116-128.
    3. Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Sobhan Asian & Mark Goh & S. Ali Torabi, 2019. "Managing sudden transportation disruptions in supply chains under delivery delay and quantity loss," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 783-814, February.
    4. Ali Emrouznejad & Marianna Marra, 2017. "The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6653-6675, November.
    5. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2019. "Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 5119-5136, August.
    6. Dilek Yilmaz Borekci & Yasin Rofcanin & Hasan Gürbüz, 2015. "Organisational resilience and relational dynamics in triadic networks: a multiple case analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(22), pages 6839-6867, November.
    7. C. Bryce & P. Ring & S. Ashby & J. K. Wardman, 2020. "Resilience in the face of uncertainty: early lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7-8), pages 880-887, August.
    8. Gao, Long, 2015. "Collaborative forecasting, inventory hedging and contract coordination in dynamic supply risk management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 133-145.
    9. Wen Jun Tan & Allan N. Zhang & Wentong Cai, 2019. "A graph-based model to measure structural redundancy for supply chain resilience," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(20), pages 6385-6404, October.
    10. Aline Dresch & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & José Antônio Valle Antunes Jr, 2015. "Design Science Research," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-07374-3, September.
    11. Soliman, Marlon & Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu & Anzanello, Michel Jose, 2018. "The impacts of lean production on the complexity of socio-technical systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 342-357.
    12. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    13. Jafar Namdar & Xueping Li & Rupy Sawhney & Ninad Pradhan, 2018. "Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 2339-2360, March.
    14. Nima Kazemi & Nikunja Mohan Modak & Kannan Govindan, 2019. "A review of reverse logistics and closed loop supply chain management studies published in IJPR: a bibliometric and content analysis," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4937-4960, August.
    15. Ruiz-Benítez, Rocío & López, Cristina & Real, Juan C., 2018. "The lean and resilient management of the supply chain and its impact on performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 190-202.
    16. Ilaria De Sanctis & Joaquín Ordieres Meré & Filippo Emanuele Ciarapica, 2018. "Resilience for lean organisational network," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(21), pages 6917-6936, November.
    17. Joanna Resurreccion & Joost Santos, 2013. "Uncertainty modeling of hurricane-based disruptions to interdependent economic and infrastructure systems," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 1497-1518, December.
    18. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2020. "Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2904-2915, May.
    19. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    20. Aline Dresch & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & José Antônio Valle Antunes, 2015. "Design Science Research," Springer Books, in: Design Science Research, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 67-102, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joao Tiago Aparicio & Elisabete Arsenio & Francisco C. Santos & Rui Henriques, 2022. "LINES: muLtImodal traNsportation rEsilience analySis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Carmen-Alexandra Stoian & Chirața Caraiani & Ionuț Florin Anica-Popa & Cornelia Dascălu & Camelia Iuliana Lungu, 2022. "Telework Systematic Model Design for the Future of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Ali Sibevei & Adel Azar & Mostafa Zandieh & Seyed Mohammad Khalili & Maziar Yazdani, 2022. "Developing a Risk Reduction Support System for Health System in Iran: A Case Study in Blood Supply Chain Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Lassana Mané, 2022. "Developing Knowledge of Supply Chain Resilience in Less-Developed Countries in the Pandemic Age," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Qingmu Su & Hsueh-Sheng Chang & Shin-En Pai, 2022. "A Comparative Study of the Resilience of Urban and Rural Areas under Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Samieinasab, Mina & Hamid, Mahdi & Rabbani, Masoud, 2022. "An integrated resilience engineering-lean management approach to performance assessment and improvement of clinical departments," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    2. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    3. Fabiane Tubino Garcia & Carla Schwengber ten Caten & Elaine Aparecida Regiani de Campos & Aline Marian Callegaro & Diego Augusto de Jesus Pacheco, 2022. "Mortality Risk Factors in Micro and Small Businesses: Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-37, February.
    4. Belhadi, Amine & Kamble, Sachin S. & Venkatesh, Mani & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Benkhati, Imane, 2022. "Building supply chain resilience and efficiency through additive manufacturing: An ambidextrous perspective on the dynamic capability view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Liu, Jiaguo & Gu, Bingmei & Chen, Jihong, 2023. "Enablers for maritime supply chain resilience during pandemic: An integrated MCDM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Dmitry Ivanov & Boris Sokolov, 2019. "Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1191-1210, December.
    7. Arsalan Zahid Piprani & Noor Ismawati Jaafar & Suhana Mohezar Ali & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2022. "Multi-dimensional supply chain flexibility and supply chain resilience: the role of supply chain risks exposure," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 307-325, June.
    8. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    9. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Basu R, Jothi & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Yuvaraj, M., 2023. "Improving agility and resilience of automotive spares supply chain: The additive manufacturing enabled truck model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    12. Kasper P.H. Lange & Gijsbert Korevaar & Inge F. Oskam & Paulien M. Herder, 2017. "Developing and Understanding Design Interventions in Relation to Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    13. Rameshwar Dubey & David J. Bryde & Cyril Foropon & Gary Graham & Mihalis Giannakis & Deepa Bhatt Mishra, 2022. "Agility in humanitarian supply chain: an organizational information processing perspective and relational view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 559-579, December.
    14. Jeanine Többen & Raymond Opdenakker, 2022. "Developing a Framework to Integrate Circularity into Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.
    15. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2022. "Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    16. Bianco, Débora & Bueno, Adauto & Godinho Filho, Moacir & Latan, Hengky & Miller Devós Ganga, Gilberto & Frank, Alejandro G. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose, 2023. "The role of Industry 4.0 in developing resilience for manufacturing companies during COVID-19," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    17. Mahmoudi, Reza & Emrouznejad, Ali & Shetab-Boushehri, Seyyed-Nader & Hejazi, Seyed Reza, 2020. "The origins, development and future directions of data envelopment analysis approach in transportation systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. Majed Bin Othayman & Abdulrahim Meshari & John Mulyata & Yaw Debrah, 2021. "Challenges Experienced by Public Higher Education Institutions of Learning in the Implementation of Training and Development: A Case Study of Saudi Arabian Higher Education," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-36, October.
    19. Rosiane Serrano & Luis Henrique Rodrigues & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Priscila Bonalume Paraboni, 2018. "Systems Thinking and Scenario Planning: Application in the Clothing Sector," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 509-537, October.
    20. Koldewey, Christian & Hemminger, Anja & Reinhold, Jannik & Gausemeier, Jürgen & Dumitrescu, Roman & Chohan, Nadia & Frank, Maximilian, 2022. "Aligning strategic position, behavior, and structure for smart service businesses in manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8893-:d:610986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.