IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i7p2876-d341332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Rural Accessibility: A Multilayer Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone

    (Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy)

  • Giancarlo Cotella

    (Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

Rural territories are worse equipped than urban ones in terms of accessibility to services and opportunities, due to their scattered development and peripheral character. Increasing cuts to loss-making services in traditional public transport contributed to increased social inequality and marginality, in so doing undermining the livability of rural communities. In this light, improving accessibility is an essential prerequisite for the sustainable development of rural areas. Whereas demand responsive transport solutions are often seen as a panacea in circumstances where traditional services are not viable, their implementation is more challenging than it may seem, due to the potential barriers intrinsically related to the differential socioeconomic, cultural, and institutional features of places. Furthermore, enhancing transport offer is only one side of the multifaceted prism of rural accessibility, and the institution of effective multi-level and multi-sector governance mechanisms is a precondition to approach the mentioned challenges under a more comprehensive perspective. Drawing on the results of the European Territorial Observatory Network (ESPON) Urban-Rural Connectivity in Non-Metropolitan Areas (URRUC) project, the paper sheds light on this issue, exploring the accessibility challenges of rural areas and proposing a multilayer policy approach aimed at supporting decision-makers in improving rural accessibility across Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone & Giancarlo Cotella, 2020. "Improving Rural Accessibility: A Multilayer Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2876-:d:341332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Ferreira & Phil Charles & Clara Tether, 2007. "Evaluating Flexible Transport Solutions," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2-3), pages 249-269.
    2. Dominic Stead, 2013. "Dimensions of territorial governance," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 142-147, March.
    3. Karst T. Geurs & Roberto Patuelli & Tomaz Ponce Dentinho (ed.), 2016. "Accessibility, Equity and Efficiency," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16534.
    4. Alys Solly & Erblin Berisha & Giancarlo Cotella & Umberto Janin Rivolin, 2020. "How Sustainable Are Land Use Tools? A Europe-Wide Typological Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Wright, Steve & Emele, C. David & Fukumoto, Masayuki & Velaga, Nagendra R. & Nelson, John D., 2014. "The design, management and operation of flexible transport systems: Comparison of experience between UK, Japan and India," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 330-338.
    6. Velaga, Nagendra R. & Beecroft, Mark & Nelson, John D. & Corsar, David & Edwards, Peter, 2012. "Transport poverty meets the digital divide: accessibility and connectivity in rural communities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 102-112.
    7. Moshe Givoni & James Macmillen & David Banister & Eran Feitelson, 2013. "From Policy Measures to Policy Packages," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Shergold, Ian & Parkhurst, Graham, 2010. "Operationalising ‘sustainable mobility’: the case of transport policy for older citizens in rural areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 336-339.
    9. Davison, Lisa & Enoch, Marcus & Ryley, Tim & Quddus, Mohammed & Wang, Chao, 2014. "A survey of Demand Responsive Transport in Great Britain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 47-54.
    10. Morsche, Wietse te & La Paix Puello, Lissy & Geurs, Karst T., 2019. "Potential uptake of adaptive transport services: An exploration of service attributes and attitudes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Steve Wright, 2013. "Designing flexible transport services: guidelines for choosing the vehicle type," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 76-92, February.
    12. Alessandro Vasta & Elisabete Figueiredo & Sandra Valente & Hilkka Vihinen & Marta Nieto-Romero, 2019. "Place-Based Policies for Sustainability and Rural Development: The Case of a Portuguese Village “Spun” in Traditional Linen," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. David Devins & Alison Darlow & Don Webber, 2008. "Beyond ‘Access’: Internet Use and Take-up of Online Services by Adults Living in Disadvantaged Areas in England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(1), pages 47-57, February.
    14. Schwanen, Tim & Lucas, Karen & Akyelken, Nihan & Cisternas Solsona, Diego & Carrasco, Juan-Antonio & Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 123-135.
    15. Everett, P. & Pieters, R. & Titus, Ph., 1994. "The consumer-environment interaction," Other publications TiSEM 2b219872-cb36-4d7c-a3c3-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Macário, Rosario & Marques, Carlos Filipe, 2008. "Transferability of sustainable urban mobility measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 146-156, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Ruggiero Sardaro & Piermichele La Sala, 2022. "Recovery and Resilience of the Inner Areas: Identifying Collective Policy Actions through PROMETHEE II," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Knierim, Lukas & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2021. "The attitude of potentially less mobile people towards demand responsive transport in a rural area in central Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Lisa Bauchinger & Anna Reichenberger & Bryonny Goodwin-Hawkins & Jurij Kobal & Mojca Hrabar & Theresia Oedl-Wieser, 2021. "Developing Sustainable and Flexible Rural–Urban Connectivity through Complementary Mobility Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Flipo, Aurore & Ortar, Nathalie & Sallustio, Madeleine, 2023. "Can the transition to sustainable mobility be fair in rural areas? A stakeholder approach to mobility justice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 136-143.
    5. Olsen, Jonathan R. & Thornton, Lukar & Tregonning, Grant & Mitchell, Richard, 2022. "Nationwide equity assessment of the 20-min neighbourhood in the scottish context: A socio-spatial proximity analysis of residential locations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    6. András Lakatos & János Tóth & Péter Mándoki, 2020. "Demand Responsive Transport Service of ‘Dead-End Villages’ in Interurban Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Joseph G. Walters & Stuart Marsh & Lucelia Rodrigues, 2022. "Planning Perspectives on Rural Connected, Autonomous and Electric Vehicle Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Alys Solly & Erblin Berisha & Giancarlo Cotella, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Urbanization. Learning from What’s Out There," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Aurore Flipo & Madeleine Sallustio & Nathalie Ortar & Nicolas Senil, 2021. "Sustainable Mobility and the Institutional Lock-In: The Example of Rural France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Elzbieta Szymanska & Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska, 2022. "Sustainable Innovative Mobility Solutions Preferred by Inhabitants of Rural Areas—The Case of Lithuania and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Eva-Luz Tejada-Gutiérrez & Zofia Koloszko-Chomentowska & Mariantonietta Fiore & Alessia Spada, 2023. "Sustainable Environmental Development from the Regional Perspective—The Interesting Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Akpan, Uduak & Morimoto, Risako, 2022. "An application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to the prioritization of rural roads to improve rural accessibility in Nigeria," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    13. Chang-Gyun Roh & Hyeonmyeong Jeon, 2021. "Decision-Making Process for Demand Response Public Transportation Service Design—A Case Study in Incheon, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Schasché, Stephanie E. & Sposato, Robert G. & Hampl, Nina, 2022. "The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 43-54.
    15. Georgios Georgiadis & Ioannis Politis & Panagiotis Papaioannou, 2020. "How Does Operational Environment Influence Public Transport Effectiveness? Evidence from European Urban Bus Operators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Antonín Vaishar & Milada Šťastná, 2021. "Accessibility of Services in Rural Areas: Southern Moravia Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morsche, Wietse te & La Paix Puello, Lissy & Geurs, Karst T., 2019. "Potential uptake of adaptive transport services: An exploration of service attributes and attitudes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Schasché, Stephanie E. & Sposato, Robert G. & Hampl, Nina, 2022. "The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 43-54.
    3. Jokinen, Jani-Pekka & Sihvola, Teemu & Mladenovic, Milos N., 2019. "Policy lessons from the flexible transport service pilot Kutsuplus in the Helsinki Capital Region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 123-133.
    4. Knierim, Lukas & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2021. "The attitude of potentially less mobile people towards demand responsive transport in a rural area in central Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Mishra, Sushreeta & Mehran, Babak & Sahu, Prasanta K., 2020. "Assessment of delivery models for semi-flexible transit operation in low-demand conditions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 275-287.
    6. Mattioli, Giulio & Lucas, Karen & Marsden, Greg, 2018. "Reprint of Transport poverty and fuel poverty in the UK: From analogy to comparison," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 114-125.
    7. Alan Lee & Martin Savelsbergh, 2017. "An extended demand responsive connector," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 25-50, March.
    8. Franco, Patrizia & Johnston, Ryan & McCormick, Ecaterina, 2020. "Demand responsive transport: Generation of activity patterns from mobile phone network data to support the operation of new mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 244-266.
    9. Zhao, Pengjun & Yu, Zhao, 2021. "Rural poverty and mobility in China: A national-level survey," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Chang-Gyun Roh & Hyeonmyeong Jeon, 2021. "Decision-Making Process for Demand Response Public Transportation Service Design—A Case Study in Incheon, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Aliaksandr Charnavalau & Elżbieta Jadwiga Szymańska & Grzegorz Czapski, 2022. "The Impact of Transport Exclusion on the Local Development of Biała County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Zhao, Pengjun & Yu, Zhao, 2020. "Investigating mobility in rural areas of China: Features, equity, and factors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 66-77.
    13. Vanessa Stjernborg & Ola Mattisson, 2016. "The Role of Public Transport in Society—A Case Study of General Policy Documents in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Mattioli, Giulio & Lucas, Karen & Marsden, Greg, 2017. "Transport poverty and fuel poverty in the UK: From analogy to comparison," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 93-105.
    15. Lena Levin, 2019. "How May Public Transport Influence the Practice of Everyday Life among Younger and Older People and How May Their Practices Influence Public Transport?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    17. Zhang, Jie & Wang, David Z.W. & Meng, Meng, 2018. "Which service is better on a linear travel corridor: Park & ride or on-demand public bus?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 803-818.
    18. Olsen, Jonathan R. & Thornton, Lukar & Tregonning, Grant & Mitchell, Richard, 2022. "Nationwide equity assessment of the 20-min neighbourhood in the scottish context: A socio-spatial proximity analysis of residential locations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    19. Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa & Koomson, Isaac & Munyanyi, Musharavati Ephraim, 2023. "Transport poverty and obesity: The mediating roles of social capital and physical activity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 155-166.
    20. Mounce, Richard & Beecroft, Mark & Nelson, John D., 2020. "On the role of frameworks and smart mobility in addressing the rural mobility problem," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2876-:d:341332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.