IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2476-d335321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plant Layout Optimization for Chemical Industry Considering Inner Frame Structure Design

Author

Listed:
  • Siyu Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Yufei Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Xiao Feng

    (School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

Plant layout design is a complex task requiring a wealth of engineering experience. A well-designed layout can extraordinarily reduce various costs, so layout study is of great value. To promote the research depth, plenty of considerations have been taken. However, an actual plant may have several frames and how to distribute facilities and determine the location of them in the different frames has not been well studied. In this work, frames are set as a special kind of inner structure and are added into the model to assign facilities into several blocks. A quantitative method for assigning facilities is proposed to let the number of cross-frame connections be minimized. After allocating the facilities into several blocks, each frame is optimized to obtain initial frame results. With designer decisions and cross-frame flow information, the relative locations of frames are determined and then the internal frame layouts are optimized again to reach the coupling optimization between frame and plant layout. Minimizing the total cost involving investment and operating costs is set to be the objective. In the case study, a plant with 138 facilities and 247 material connections is studied. All the facilities are assigned into four frames, and only 17 connections are left to be cross-frame ones. Through the two optimizations of each frame, the length of cross-frame connections reduces by 582.7 m, and the total cost decreases by 4.7 × 10 5 ¥/a. Through these steps, the idea of frame is successfully applied and the effectiveness of the proposed methodology is proved.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyu Xu & Yufei Wang & Xiao Feng, 2020. "Plant Layout Optimization for Chemical Industry Considering Inner Frame Structure Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2476-:d:335321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stijepovic, Mirko Z. & Linke, Patrick, 2011. "Optimal waste heat recovery and reuse in industrial zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4019-4031.
    2. Wang, Ruiqi & Zhao, Huan & Wu, Yan & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao & Liu, Mengxi, 2018. "An industrial facility layout design method considering energy saving based on surplus rectangle fill algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1038-1051.
    3. Friedrich, Christian & Klausnitzer, Armin & Lasch, Rainer, 2018. "Integrated slicing tree approach for solving the facility layout problem with input and output locations based on contour distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 837-851.
    4. Friedrich, C. & Klausnitzer, A. & Lasch, R., 2018. "Integrated slicing tree approach for solving the facility layout problem with input and output locations based on contour distance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 94867, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Vitayasak, Srisatja & Pongcharoen, Pupong & Hicks, Chris, 2017. "A tool for solving stochastic dynamic facility layout problems with stochastic demand using either a Genetic Algorithm or modified Backtracking Search Algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 146-157.
    6. Montreuil, Benoit & Ratliff, H. Donald, 1988. "Optimizing the location of input/output stations within facilities layout," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 177-187, September.
    7. Mehdi Toloo & Madjid Tavana & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2019. "An integrated data envelopment analysis and mixed integer non-linear programming model for linearizing the common set of weights," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(4), pages 887-904, December.
    8. Gomez, A. & Fernandez, Q. I. & De la Fuente Garcia, D. & Garcia, P. J., 2003. "Using genetic algorithms to resolve layout problems in facilities where there are aisles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 271-282, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pourvaziri, Hani & Pierreval, Henri & Marian, Helene, 2021. "Integrating facility layout design and aisle structure in manufacturing systems: Formulation and exact solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 499-513.
    2. Mariem Besbes & Marc Zolghadri & Roberta Costa Affonso & Faouzi Masmoudi & Mohamed Haddar, 2020. "A methodology for solving facility layout problem considering barriers: genetic algorithm coupled with A* search," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 615-640, March.
    3. Mehmet Burak Şenol & Ekrem Alper Murat, 2023. "A sequential solution heuristic for continuous facility layout problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 355-377, January.
    4. Hua, Hao & Hovestadt, Ludger & Tang, Peng & Li, Biao, 2019. "Integer programming for urban design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 1125-1137.
    5. Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee & Alireza Goli & Abbas Mardani, 2023. "A novel two-echelon hierarchical location-allocation-routing optimization for green energy-efficient logistics systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 795-823, May.
    6. Song, Runrun & Chang, Chenglin & Tang, Qikui & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M., 2017. "The implementation of inter-plant heat integration among multiple plants. Part II: The mathematical model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 382-393.
    7. Ioannou, George, 2006. "Time-phased creation of hybrid manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 183-198, August.
    8. Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Fodor, Zsófia & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2012. "Total Site targeting with process specific minimum temperature difference (ΔTmin)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 20-28.
    9. Meng, Fankai & Chen, Lingen & Feng, Yuanli & Xiong, Bing, 2017. "Thermoelectric generator for industrial gas phase waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 83-90.
    10. Zhongwei Zhang & Lihui Wu & Zhaoyun Wu & Wenqiang Zhang & Shun Jia & Tao Peng, 2022. "Energy-Saving Oriented Manufacturing Workshop Facility Layout: A Solution Approach Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    11. Kuldeep Lamba & Ravi Kumar & Shraddha Mishra & Shubhangini Rajput, 2020. "Sustainable dynamic cellular facility layout: a solution approach using simulated annealing-based meta-heuristic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 5-26, July.
    12. Xingyun Yan & Lingyu Wang & Mingzhu Fang & Jie Hu, 2022. "How Can Industrial Parks Achieve Carbon Neutrality? Literature Review and Research Prospect Based on the CiteSpace Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-29, December.
    13. Zhang, Chuan & Zhou, Li & Chhabra, Pulkit & Garud, Sushant S. & Aditya, Kevin & Romagnoli, Alessandro & Comodi, Gabriele & Dal Magro, Fabio & Meneghetti, Antonella & Kraft, Markus, 2016. "A novel methodology for the design of waste heat recovery network in eco-industrial park using techno-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 88-102.
    14. Bertrand, Alexandre & Mian, Alberto & Kantor, Ivan & Aggoune, Riad & Maréchal, François, 2019. "Regional waste heat valorisation: A mixed integer linear programming method for energy service companies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 454-468.
    15. Xuemin Liu & Guozhong Huang & Shengnan Ou & Xingyu Xiao & Xuehong Gao & Zhangzhou Meng & Youqiang Pan & Ibrahim M. Hezam, 2023. "Biobjective Optimization Model Considering Risk and Profit for the Multienterprise Layout Design in Village-Level Industrial Parks in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Hür Bütün & Ivan Kantor & François Maréchal, 2019. "Incorporating Location Aspects in Process Integration Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-45, August.
    17. Matthias Rathjens & Georg Fieg, 2019. "Cost-Optimal Heat Exchanger Network Synthesis Based on a Flexible Cost Functions Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    18. O’Neill, Sam & Wrigley, Paul & Bagdasar, Ovidiu, 2022. "A mixed-integer linear programming formulation for the modular layout of three-dimensional connected systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 739-754.
    19. Chang, Chenglin & Chen, Xiaolu & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous optimization of multi-plant heat integration using intermediate fluid circles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 306-317.
    20. Rastpour, Amir & Esfahani, M.S., 2010. "Mathematical models for selection of optimal place and size of connections considering the time-value of money," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 764-773, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2476-:d:335321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.