IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p2022-d329429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Machine Learning-Based Algorithms to Analyze Erosion Rates of a Watershed in Northern Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Kieu Anh Nguyen

    (Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Walter Chen

    (Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Bor-Shiun Lin

    (Disaster Prevention Technology Research Center, Sinotech Engineering Consultants, Taipei 11494, Taiwan)

  • Uma Seeboonruang

    (Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand)

Abstract

This study continues a previous study with further analysis of watershed-scale erosion pin measurements. Three machine learning (ML) algorithms—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—were used to analyze depth of erosion of a watershed (Shihmen reservoir) in northern Taiwan. In addition to three previously used statistical indexes (Mean Absolute Error, Root Mean Square of Error, and R-squared), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) was calculated to compare the predictive performances of the three models. To see if there was a statistical difference between the three models, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. The research utilized 14 environmental attributes as the input predictors of the ML algorithms. They are distance to river, distance to road, type of slope, sub-watershed, slope direction, elevation, slope class, rainfall, epoch, lithology, and the amount of organic content, clay, sand, and silt in the soil. Additionally, measurements of a total of 550 erosion pins installed on 55 slopes were used as the target variable of the model prediction. The dataset was divided into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%) using the stratified random sampling with sub-watershed as the stratification variable. The results showed that the ANFIS model outperforms the other two algorithms in predicting the erosion rates of the study area. The average RMSE of the test data is 2.05 mm/yr for ANFIS, compared to 2.36 mm/yr and 2.61 mm/yr for ANN and SVM, respectively. Finally, the results of this study (ANN, ANFIS, and SVM) were compared with the previous study (Random Forest, Decision Tree, and multiple regression). It was found that Random Forest remains the best predictive model, and ANFIS is the second-best among the six ML algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Kieu Anh Nguyen & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang, 2020. "Using Machine Learning-Based Algorithms to Analyze Erosion Rates of a Watershed in Northern Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2022-:d:329429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bor-Shiun Lin & Chun-Kai Chen & Kent Thomas & Chen-Kun Hsu & Hsing-Chuan Ho, 2019. "Improvement of the K-Factor of USLE and Soil Erosion Estimation in Shihmen Reservoir Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Yu-Jia Chiu & Kang-Tsung Chang & Yi-Chin Chen & Jiunn-Hsing Chao & Hong-Yuan Lee, 2011. "Estimation of soil erosion rates in a subtropical mountain watershed using 137 Cs radionuclide," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(1), pages 271-284, October.
    3. Despotovic, Milan & Nedic, Vladimir & Despotovic, Danijela & Cvetanovic, Slobodan, 2016. "Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean horizontal diffuse solar radiation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 246-260.
    4. Lo, Kwong Fai A., 1994. "Quantifying soil erosion for the Shihmen reservoir watershed, Taiwan," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 105-116.
    5. Kieu Anh Nguyen & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang & Kent Thomas, 2019. "Predicting Sheet and Rill Erosion of Shihmen Reservoir Watershed in Taiwan Using Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Antonio Alberto Rodríguez Sousa & Jesús M. Barandica & Alejandro Rescia, 2019. "Ecological and Economic Sustainability in Olive Groves with Different Irrigation Management and Levels of Erosion: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Milad Alizadeh Jabehdar & Vida Davidavičienė & Mohammad Ali Ghorbani & Saad Sh. Sammen, 2021. "A Simple Way to Increase the Prediction Accuracy of Hydrological Processes Using an Artificial Intelligence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Kent Thomas & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang, 2020. "Evaluation of the SEdiment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) Model in the Shihmen Reservoir Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walter Chen & Kieu Anh Nguyen, 2022. "The New Island-Wide LS Factors of Taiwan, with Comparison with EU Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Kent Thomas & Walter Chen & Bor-Shiun Lin & Uma Seeboonruang, 2020. "Evaluation of the SEdiment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) Model in the Shihmen Reservoir Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Walter Chen & Kieu Anh Nguyen & Yu-Chieh Huang, 2023. "Soil Erosion in Taiwan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Luo, Laipeng & Zhang, Zhiyi & Li, Chong & Nishu, & He, Fang & Zhang, Xingguang & Cai, Junmeng, 2021. "Insight into master plots method for kinetic analysis of lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić & Yamna Erraach & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier, 2022. "Implementation of circular business models for olive oil waste and by-product valorization," Post-Print hal-03756908, HAL.
    6. Mechthild Donner & Ivana Radić & Yamna Erraach & Fatima El Hadad-Gauthier, 2022. "Implementation of Circular Business Models for Olive Oil Waste and By-Product Valorization," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Wiktor Olchowik & Jędrzej Gajek & Andrzej Michalski, 2023. "The Use of Evolutionary Algorithms in the Modelling of Diffuse Radiation in Terms of Simulating the Energy Efficiency of Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-32, March.
    8. Fan, Junliang & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Cai, Huanjie & Ma, Xin & Bai, Hua, 2019. "Evaluation and development of empirical models for estimating daily and monthly mean daily diffuse horizontal solar radiation for different climatic regions of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 168-186.
    9. Yingbo Pang & Iftikhar Azim & Momina Rauf & Muhammad Farjad Iqbal & Xinguang Ge & Muhammad Ashraf & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rahman Tariq & Anne W. M. Ng, 2022. "Prediction of Bidirectional Shear Strength of Rectangular RC Columns Subjected to Multidirectional Earthquake Actions for Collapse Prevention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, June.
    10. Limouni, Tariq & Yaagoubi, Reda & Bouziane, Khalid & Guissi, Khalid & Baali, El Houssain, 2023. "Accurate one step and multistep forecasting of very short-term PV power using LSTM-TCN model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1010-1024.
    11. Tao Xu & Siqi Yi & Yong Zhou & Qing Li & Yizhu Liu, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Changes and Driving Forces of Soil Properties in Subtropical Mountainous Areas from 2017 to 2020: A Case Study of Baokang County, Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Rashid Latief & Umair Akram, 2023. "The Effects of Board Capital on Green Innovation to Improve Green Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Nunez Munoz, Maria & Ballantyne, Erica E.F. & Stone, David A., 2022. "Development and evaluation of empirical models for the estimation of hourly horizontal diffuse solar irradiance in the United Kingdom," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    14. Saioa Etxebarria Berrizbeitia & Eulalia Jadraque Gago & Tariq Muneer, 2020. "Empirical Models for the Estimation of Solar Sky-Diffuse Radiation. A Review and Experimental Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Wang, Lunche & Kisi, Ozgur & Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad & Salazar, Germán Ariel & Zhu, Zhongmin & Gong, Wei, 2016. "Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 384-397.
    16. Ramadhan, Raden A.A. & Heatubun, Yosca R.J. & Tan, Sek F. & Lee, Hyun-Jin, 2021. "Comparison of physical and machine learning models for estimating solar irradiance and photovoltaic power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1006-1019.
    17. Mahmood Ahmad & Badr T. Alsulami & Ramez A. Al-Mansob & Saerahany Legori Ibrahim & Suraparb Keawsawasvong & Ali Majdi & Feezan Ahmad, 2022. "Predicting Subgrade Resistance Value of Hydrated Lime-Activated Rice Husk Ash-Treated Expansive Soil: A Comparison between M5P, Support Vector Machine, and Gaussian Process Regression Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Martín-Pomares, Luis & Martínez, Diego & Polo, Jesús & Perez-Astudillo, Daniel & Bachour, Dunia & Sanfilippo, Antonio, 2017. "Analysis of the long-term solar potential for electricity generation in Qatar," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1231-1246.
    19. Antonio Alberto Rodríguez Sousa & Carlos Parra-López & Samir Sayadi-Gmada & Jesús M. Barandica & Alejandro J. Rescia, 2021. "Impacts of Erosion on the Sustainability of Organic Olive Groves: A Case Study (Estepa Region, Southwestern Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Laila Ouazzani Chahidi & Marco Fossa & Antonella Priarone & Abdellah Mechaqrane, 2021. "Evaluation of Supervised Learning Models in Predicting Greenhouse Energy Demand and Production for Intelligent and Sustainable Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2022-:d:329429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.