IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p1082-d316008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights for Sustainability of Smartphone Business: Understanding Customer Switching Behavior in Smartphone Services

Author

Listed:
  • Chang-Gyu Oh

    (Department of Management Information Systems, School of Business, Kyungnam University, Changwon 51767, Korea)

  • Jongpil Park

    (Department of Management Information Systems, School of Business, Kyungnam University, Changwon 51767, Korea)

Abstract

Competition in smartphone market has been fierce, and customers’ switching has become a primary concern for the success of smartphone businesses. Nonetheless, research on customer switching behavior regarding smartphones is still under investigation. The purpose of this study is to examine how social factors affect users’ smartphone switching intention and how customer rational and emotional factors moderate the customers’ switching behavioral intention. In an attempt to understand the switching behavior of smartphone users, this study develops and tests a model drawn from social factors (e.g., media and peer influence), customer rational factors (e.g., switching experience and confidence in decision making), and customer emotional factors (e.g., anticipated regret and alternative attractiveness). The model is tested with data collected from 302 smartphone users. The results of structural equation modeling analysis demonstrate that, when customers make switching decision, both media influence and peer influence affect behavioral switching intention. Further, this study also revealed that customer rational and emotional factors moderate the effects of media influence and peer influence toward customers’ switching intention. Overall, this study enhances the omnidirectional understanding of the switching behavior of smartphone users and can help smartphone companies in fierce competition to lead to sustainable growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang-Gyu Oh & Jongpil Park, 2020. "Insights for Sustainability of Smartphone Business: Understanding Customer Switching Behavior in Smartphone Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1082-:d:316008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1082/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1082/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Childers, Terry L & Rao, Akshay R, 1992. "The Influence of Familial and Peer-Based Reference Groups on Consumer Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(2), pages 198-211, September.
    2. Alina Stankevich, 2017. "Explaining the Consumer Decision-Making Process: Critical Literature Review," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 2(6), pages 7-14, September.
    3. Bearden, William O & Hardesty, David M & Rose, Randall L, 2001. "Consumer Self-Confidence: Refinements in Conceptualization and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 121-134, June.
    4. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Kristine L. Nowak & Rory McGloin, 2014. "The Influence of Peer Reviews on Source Credibility and Purchase Intention," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Zeelenberg, M., 1999. "The use of crying over spilled milk : A note on the rationality and functionality of regret," Other publications TiSEM 66ac04be-d1ee-4a0e-9e97-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Tsai, Claire I. & Klayman, Joshua & Hastie, Reid, 2008. "Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 97-105, November.
    8. Shih, Eric & Schau, Hope Jensen, 2011. "To Justify or Not to Justify: The Role of Anticipated Regret on Consumers’ Decisions to Upgrade Technological Innovations," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 242-251.
    9. Ezlika Ghazali & Bang Nguyen & Dilip S. Mutum & Amrul Asraf Mohd-Any, 2016. "Constructing online switching barriers: examining the effects of switching costs and alternative attractiveness on e-store loyalty in online pure-play retailers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 157-171, May.
    10. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hwang, Jeong Seop & Rho, Jae Jeung & Hwang, Yoon Min, 2023. "Influence of cognitive and social change factors on E-vehicle switching intention: Evidence from Korea," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    2. Johannes D. Hattula & Walter Herzog & Ravi Dhar, 2023. "The impact of touchscreen devices on consumers’ choice confidence and purchase likelihood," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 35-53, March.
    3. Heidenreich, Sven & Killmer, Jan F. & Millemann, Jan A., 2022. "If at first you don't adopt - Investigating determinants of new product leapfrogging behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Iyer, Pramod & Harun, Ahasan, 2021. "Return policy, No joke: An investigation into the impact of a retailer's return policy on consumers' decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Qianshuo Liu, 2023. "The impact of consumer’s regret on firms’ decisions in a durable good market," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 125-157, July.
    6. Daniel Villanova, 2019. "The extended self, product valuation, and the endowment effect," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 357-371, December.
    7. Reb, Jochen & Connolly, Terry, 2009. "Myopic regret avoidance: Feedback avoidance and learning in repeated decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 182-189, July.
    8. Floyd, Kristopher & Freling, Ryan & Alhoqail, Saad & Cho, Hyun Young & Freling, Traci, 2014. "How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 217-232.
    9. Daan Kabel & Mattias Elg & Erik Sundin, 2021. "Factors Influencing Sustainable Purchasing Behaviour of Remanufactured Robotic Lawn Mowers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Bonsón Ponte, Enrique & Carvajal-Trujillo, Elena & Escobar-Rodríguez, Tomás, 2015. "Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 286-302.
    11. Wu, Hung-Che & Ai, Chi-Han & Cheng, Ching-Chan, 2019. "Experiential quality, experiential psychological states and experiential outcomes in an unmanned convenience store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 409-420.
    12. Boeri, Marco & Longo, Alberto, 2017. "The importance of regret minimization in the choice for renewable energy programmes: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 253-260.
    13. Minh Ha Nguyen & Bui Thanh Khoa, 2019. "Perceived Mental Benefit in Electronic Commerce: Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Sven Laumer & Andreas Eckhardt & Natascha Trunk, 2010. "Do as your parents say?—Analyzing IT adoption influencing factors for full and under age applicants," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 169-183, April.
    15. Jianqiang Zhang & Krista J. Li, 2021. "Quality Disclosure Under Consumer Loss Aversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 5052-5069, August.
    16. Wilken, Robert & Cornelißen, Markus & Backhaus, Klaus & Schmitz, Christian, 2010. "Steering sales reps through cost information: An investigation into the black box of cognitive references and negotiation behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 69-82.
    17. Giselle Moraes Ramos & Winnie Daamen & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2014. "A State-of-the-Art Review: Developments in Utility Theory, Prospect Theory and Regret Theory to Investigate Travellers' Behaviour in Situations Involving Travel Time Uncertainty," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67, January.
    18. Liu, Hongfei & Meng-Lewis, Yue & Ibrahim, Fahad & Zhu, Xia, 2021. "Superfoods, super healthy: Myth or reality? Examining consumers’ repurchase and WOM intention regarding superfoods: A theory of consumption values perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 69-88.
    19. Jin, Liyin & He, Yanqun & Song, Haiyan, 2012. "Service customization: To upgrade or to downgrade? An investigation of how option framing affects tourists’ choice of package-tour services," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 266-275.
    20. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1082-:d:316008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.