IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i3p1001-d314573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Pricing Strategy of “Internet +” Recycling Platforms in a Two-Sided Network Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Zhu

    (School of Management Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    Development Institute of Jiangbei New Area, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Wei Li

    (Chang Wang School of Honors, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

“Internet +” platform recycling is an emerging business model with two-sided market characteristics. How to meet the needs of consumers and manufacturers and how to formulate a reasonable two-sided pricing structure have become challenges faced by recycling trading platforms. Based on the theory of a two-sided market, the pricing mechanism of a monopoly platform and a model of competing platforms are studied. Consequently, a sensitivity analysis and comparison analysis are conducted, giving a pricing decision and the optimal profit of closed-loop supply chain systems. Finally, through a numerical simulation analysis, the impacts of the inter-group network externalities, service differentiation, and the matching efficiency on e-waste recycling prices and profits are obtained. The result indicates that the influences of inter-group network externalities on monopoly platforms and competing platforms are different; thus, platforms should choose pricing strategies according to their own market position. The pricing of the two types of platform is inversely proportional to the time-sensitive coefficient of the two platforms, while it is directly proportional to the matching efficiency. The improvement of the differentiation of service will increase the pricing of the platform for single-homing manufacturers without affecting the multi-homing consumers, and profits will increase accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Zhu & Wei Li, 2020. "Research on the Pricing Strategy of “Internet +” Recycling Platforms in a Two-Sided Network Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1001-:d:314573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/1001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caillaud, Bernard & Jullien, Bruno, 2003. "Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 34(2), pages 309-328, Summer.
    2. Xi Vincent Wang & Lihui Wang, 2019. "Digital twin-based WEEE recycling, recovery and remanufacturing in the background of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 3892-3902, June.
    3. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    4. Andrei Hagiu, 2004. "Two-Sided Platforms: Pricing and Social Efficiency," Discussion papers 04035, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. Andrei Hagiu, 2004. "Two-Sided Platforms: Pricing and Social Efficiency - Extensions," Discussion papers 04036, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    6. Atalay Atasu & Miklos Sarvary & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2008. "Remanufacturing as a Marketing Strategy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1731-1746, October.
    7. Mustafa O. Kabul & Ali K. Parlaktürk, 2019. "The Value of Commitments When Selling to Strategic Consumers: A Supply Chain Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4754-4770, October.
    8. Li, Yongjian & Feng, Lipan & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Fangchao, 2019. "Effects of a secondary market on original equipment manufactures’ pricing, trade-in remanufacturing, and entry decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 751-766.
    9. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    10. Awasthi, Abhishek Kumar & Li, Jinhui, 2017. "Management of electrical and electronic waste: A comparative evaluation of China and India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 434-447.
    11. Kung, Ling-Chieh & Zhong, Guan-Yu, 2017. "The optimal pricing strategy for two-sided platform delivery in the sharing economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaohui Feng & Wei Li & Hua Zhang & Xumei Zhang, 2023. "A Framework of a Blockchain-Supported Remanufacturing Trading Platform through Gap Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bolt, Wilko & Tieman, Alexander F., 2008. "Heavily skewed pricing in two-sided markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 1250-1255, September.
    2. Chokri Aloui & Khaïreddine Jebsi, 2010. "Optimal pricing of a two-sided monopoly platform with a one-sided congestion effect," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 57(4), pages 423-439, December.
    3. Yuan, Michael Y., 2008. "The effects of barriers to entry on monopolistic intermediary online services: The case of a digital library," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 56-73, March.
    4. Andrei Hagiu, 2004. "Two-Sided Platforms: Pricing and Social Efficiency," Discussion papers 04035, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    6. Zhangwei Feng & Na Luo & Yanping Liu, 2021. "Trade-in Strategy and Competition between Two Independent Remanufacturers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Jan KRÄMER & Michael WOHLFARTH, 2015. "Regulating Over-the-Top Service Providers in Two-Sided Content Markets: Insights from the Economic Literature," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(99), pages 71-90, 3rd quart.
    8. Zhao, Senlin & You, Zhuangzhuang & Zhu, Qinghua, 2021. "Quality choice for product recovery considering a trade-in program and third-party remanufacturing competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    9. Juan Manuel Sanchez‐Cartas & Gonzalo León, 2021. "Multisided Platforms And Markets: A Survey Of The Theoretical Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 452-487, April.
    10. Cai, Ya-Jun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Zhang, Ting, 2022. "Commercial used apparel collection operations in retail supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 169-181.
    11. Yuki Inoue & Takeshi Takenaka & Koichi Kurumatani, 2019. "Sustainability of Service Intermediary Platform Ecosystems: Analysis and Simulation of Japanese Hotel Booking Platform-Based Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Zheng, Yanyan & Zhao, Yingxue & Wang, Nengmin & Meng, Xiaoge & Yang, Honglin, 2022. "Financing decision for a remanufacturing supply chain with a capital constrained retailer: A study from the perspective of market uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. Estelle Malavolti, 2016. "Single Till or Dual Till at airports: a Two-Sided Market Analysis," Post-Print hal-01406372, HAL.
    14. Lam, W., 2015. "Switching Costs in Two-sided Markets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015024, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    15. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    16. Jennifer Brown & John Morgan, 2009. "How Much Is a Dollar Worth? Tipping versus Equilibrium Coexistence on Competing Online Auction Sites," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 117(4), pages 668-700, August.
    17. Amelio, Andrea & Giardino-Karlinger, Liliane & Valletti, Tommaso, 2020. "Exclusionary pricing in two-sided markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Renato Gomes & Alessandro Pavan, 2013. "Cross-Subsidization and Matching Design," Discussion Papers 1559, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    19. Qingyuan Zhu & Chenghao Yu & Zhiyang SHEN & Malin Song, 2023. "Competition between a manufacturer and a relicensing third party when customers are strategic," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2021-2040, June.
    20. Ying Wu & Youwei Li, 2022. "Competition or Authorization—Manufacturers’ Choice of Remanufacturing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:1001-:d:314573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.