IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p9282-d441913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Could Cooperatives Successfully Develop Their Social Responsibility: The Perspective of Life Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Tang

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Economic Management, Faculty of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
    Department of Economics and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Timo Sipiläinen

    (Department of Economics and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Gang Fu

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Economic Management, Faculty of Management, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
    Faculty of Business, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611830, China)

Abstract

Social responsibility is a natural obligation of cooperatives, and fulfilling social responsibility is of great meaning to the sustainable development of cooperatives and society. This article constructs a “life cycle-cooperative social responsibility framework (LC-CoopSRF)” and analyzes the framework with the case of Chongxin Apiculture Specialized Cooperative of Sichuan Province, China. The research results show that cooperatives should respect the law of life cycle, consider conditions such as operational capabilities and ethical expectations, and fulfill social responsibility in a reasonable manner. The successful cooperative highlights the bottom-line responsibility in the establishment phase, internal responsibility in the growth phase, system responsibility in the maturity phase, and the differentiation phase is the phase of system responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Tang & Timo Sipiläinen & Gang Fu, 2020. "How Could Cooperatives Successfully Develop Their Social Responsibility: The Perspective of Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9282-:d:441913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael L. Cook, 2018. "A Life Cycle Explanation of Cooperative Longevity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    3. Sandra A. Waddock & Samuel B. Graves, 1997. "The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 303-319, April.
    4. Woo Jae Lee & Seung Uk Choi, 2018. "Effects of Corporate Life Cycle on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2003. "The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 997-1010, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noreen Byrne, 2023. "Cooperative Lifecycle Framing—Reinvention or Regeneration and Does It Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Cleverton Rodrigues Fernandes & André Gustavo Carvalho Machado, 2019. "Technology Transfer Capability: development dynamics in higher education institutions," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Noordewier, Thomas G. & Lucas, Marilyn T., 2020. "On being green and profitable: Does industry context matter?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    5. Abel Duarte Alonso & Seng K. Kok & Seamus O'Brien, 2019. "Understanding Approaches To Innovation Through The Dynamic Capabilities Lens: A Multi-Country Study Of The Wine Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Laura Carraresi & Xhevrie Mamaqi & Luis Miguel Albisu & Alessandro Banterle, 2016. "Can Strategic Capabilities Affect Performance? Application of RBV to Small Food Businesses," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 416-436, July.
    7. Mehmet Altin, 2017. "A taxonomy of hotel revenue management implementation strategies," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(3), pages 246-264, June.
    8. Alexis Catanzaro & Christine Teyssier, 2021. "Export promotion programs, export capabilities, and risk management practices of internationalized SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1479-1503, October.
    9. Collins E. Okafor & Nacasius U. Ujah & Eunho Cho & Winifred U. Okafor & Kevin L. James, 2023. "The Moderating Effect of a Golden Parachute on the Association between CSR and Firm Value: Does Gender-Driven Innovation Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas Rathgeber & Stefan Stöckl, 2018. "Economic Development Matters: A Meta‐Regression Analysis on the Relation between Environmental Management and Financial Performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 720-744, August.
    11. Dongsheng Zhang & Hongwei Wang & Xiangshan Jin, 2022. "Element Matching and Configuration Path of Corporate Social Responsibility Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Tolossa Fufa Gulema & Yadessa Tadesse Roba, 2021. "Internal and external determinants of corporate social responsibility practices in multinational enterprise subsidiaries in developing countries: evidence from Ethiopia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Maria Vittoria Franceschelli & Gabriele Santoro & Elisa Giacosa & Roberto Quaglia, 2019. "Assessing the determinants of performance in the recycling business: Evidence from the Italian context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1086-1099, September.
    14. Asiri, Mohammed & Al-Hadi, Ahmed & Taylor, Grantley & Duong, Lien, 2020. "Is corporate tax avoidance associated with investment efficiency?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Mirella Muhic & Lars Bengtsson, 2021. "Dynamic capabilities triggered by cloud sourcing: a stage-based model of business model innovation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 33-54, January.
    16. Wu, Xiaojuan & Dluhošová, Dana & Zmeškal, Zdeněk, 2023. "The moderating role of a corporate life cycle with the impact of economic value-added on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China's listed companies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    17. Nam Chul Jung & Hyun Ah Kim, 2019. "The Effect of Listing Period on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Annika Veh & Markus Göbel & Rick Vogel, 2019. "Corporate reputation in management research: a review of the literature and assessment of the concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 315-353, December.
    19. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2022. "A stakeholder resource-based view of corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 830-843.
    20. Stephan Manning & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters & Arie Y. Lewin, 2018. "The changing rationale for governance choices: Early vs. late adopters of global services sourcing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 2303-2334, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:9282-:d:441913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.