IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4680-d368734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mixed-Method Study of Design Practices and Designers’ Roles in Sustainable-Minded Clothing Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Essi Karell

    (Department of Design, School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

  • Kirsi Niinimäki

    (Department of Design, School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland)

Abstract

The way in which the current fashion industry operates needs to fundamentally change. In this endeavour, designers are considered central figures throughout the sustainable fashion literature. However, too little is known about clothing designers’ practical contributions to sustainability. Therefore, this study investigates how sustainability is integrated into design practices in sustainable-minded clothing companies and determines the role of clothing designers in this respect. A mixed-method study was conducted based on a sequential exploratory strategy. The data were collected in two stages: a preliminary phase based on five expert interviews and a survey phase, which involved 31 clothing designers from around Europe. The data analysis was also divided into two phases: thematic analysis of the interviews and content analysis of the survey. The findings indicate that the sustainable design practices within these companies predominantly focus on material choices and aspects that support product longevity. Yet, there is little empirical evidence to support claims regarding garments’ true longevity. Knowledge regarding materials, recycling and best practices is also lacking among clothing designers. Lack of knowledge and company strategies frequently dictate and restrict the design work. This further highlights the fact that designers’ opportunities to influence environmental and social change are more limited than earlier literature suggests.

Suggested Citation

  • Essi Karell & Kirsi Niinimäki, 2020. "A Mixed-Method Study of Design Practices and Designers’ Roles in Sustainable-Minded Clothing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4680-:d:368734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4680/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4680/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Róbert Štefko & Vladimira Steffek, 2018. "Key Issues in Slow Fashion: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Anika Kozlowski & Michal Bardecki & Cory Searcy, 2019. "Tools for Sustainable Fashion Design: An Analysis of Their Fitness for Purpose," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Nicholas A. Ashford & Ralph P. Hall, 2011. "The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Young Kim & Sungeun Suh, 2022. "The Core Value of Sustainable Fashion: A Case Study on “Market Gredit”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Margherita Pero & Elisa Arrigo & Antoinette Fionda-Douglas, 2020. "Sustainability in Fashion Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-4, July.
    3. Riikka Piippo & Kirsi Niinimäki & Maarit Aakko, 2022. "Fit for the Future: Garment Quality and Product Lifetimes in a CE Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Xiaoxiao Zhou & Ryoga Miyauchi & Yuki Inoue, 2023. "Sustainable Fashion Product Innovation: Continuous Value of Apparel Products on Second-Hand Product Trading Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea, 2022. "Policy, regulation effectiveness, and sustainability in the energy sector: A worldwide interval-based composite indicator," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Li, Yanfei & Ji, Qiang & Zhang, Dayong, 2020. "Technological catching up and innovation policies in China: What is behind this largely successful story?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Ana Cláudia Amaro & Luisa M. Martinez & Filipe R. Ramos & Karla Menezes & Silvio Menezes, 2023. "An overstimulated consumer in a highly visual world: the moderating effect of the highly sensitive person trait on the attitude towards the ad," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1429-1458, September.
    5. Pelkmans, Jacques & Renda, Andrea, 2014. "Does EU regulation hinder or stimulate innovation?," CEPS Papers 9822, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    6. Juan Manuel Bucheli-Calvache & Alexander Zuñiga-Collazos & Fabian Osorio-Tinoco & María de los Ángeles Cervantes-Rosas, 2023. "Proposal for an Eco-Innovation Concept for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Sojin Jung & Byoungho Ellie Jin, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Slow fashion branding: understanding what consumers value most," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 141-149, March.
    8. Christian Brodhag, 2013. "Research universities, technology transfer, and job creation: what infrastructure, for what training?," Post-Print emse-00804454, HAL.
    9. Adrián Rabadán & Ángela Triguero & Ángela Gonzalez-Moreno, 2020. "Cooperation as the Secret Ingredient in the Recipe to Foster Internal Technological Eco-Innovation in the Agri-Food Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Marco Remondino, 2018. "Information Technology in Healthcare: HHC-MOTES, a Novel Set of Metrics to Analyse IT Sustainability in Different Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Helen X Trejo & Tasha L Lewis, 2020. "Evaluating New York raw fiber-to-retail," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(8), pages 787-807, December.
    12. Tonino Pencarelli & Viktória Ali Taha & Veronika Škerháková & Tomáš Valentiny & Richard Fedorko, 2019. "Luxury Products and Sustainability Issues from the Perspective of Young Italian Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    13. So Young Song & Youn-Kyung Kim, 2019. "Doing Good Better: Impure Altruism in Green Apparel Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Naqvi, Asjad & Stockhammer, Engelbert, 2018. "Directed Technological Change in a Post-Keynesian Ecological Macromodel," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 168-188.
    15. Jungwon Yoon & Jiyoung Park, 2015. "Comparative Analysis of Material Criteria in Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools and Urban Design Guidelines: Cases of the UK, the US, Japan, and Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-38, October.
    16. Quitzow, Rainer, 2015. "Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: A review of India's National Solar Mission," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 233-243.
    17. J. Augusto Felício & Ricardo Rodrigues & Vitor Caldeirinha, 2021. "Green Shipping Effect on Sustainable Economy and Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Alessandro Marino & Paolo Aversa & Luiz Mesquita & Jaideep Anand, 2015. "Driving Performance via Exploration in Changing Environments: Evidence from Formula One Racing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1079-1100, August.
    19. Tae Hyung Kim & Bowon Kim, 2018. "Firm’s Environmental Expenditure, R&D Intensity, and Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    20. Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Regulatory versus consumer pressure and retailer responsibility for upstream pollution in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4680-:d:368734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.