IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p726-d721579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fit for the Future: Garment Quality and Product Lifetimes in a CE Context

Author

Listed:
  • Riikka Piippo

    (Design Department, School of Art, Design and Architecture, Aalto University, P.O. Box 31000, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland)

  • Kirsi Niinimäki

    (Design Department, School of Art, Design and Architecture, Aalto University, P.O. Box 31000, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland)

  • Maarit Aakko

    (Design Department, School of Art, Design and Architecture, Aalto University, P.O. Box 31000, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland)

Abstract

The fashion industry is one of the most polluting industrial sectors in the world and its environmental impacts are huge. Garments are produced effectively at a low price, are of low quality, and are used for a very short time before ending up in increasing textile waste streams. One critical aspect in this context is the lifetime of a garment. Short garment lifetimes are the results of low quality and consumer dissatisfaction, or consumers’ constant search for newness, resulting in the early disposal of garments. This study focused on the issue of garment quality and how it can be connected to product lifetime. The research used a case study approach, including company interviews about working for quality, and aimed to expand on the topic of how quality impacts product lifetimes. Data analysis was conducted according to the principles of descriptive analysis and the discussion expanded to the circular economy context, creating an extended understanding of garment quality in a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Riikka Piippo & Kirsi Niinimäki & Maarit Aakko, 2022. "Fit for the Future: Garment Quality and Product Lifetimes in a CE Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:726-:d:721579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/726/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/726/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Essi Karell & Kirsi Niinimäki, 2020. "A Mixed-Method Study of Design Practices and Designers’ Roles in Sustainable-Minded Clothing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Oksana Mont, 2008. "Innovative approaches to optimising design and use of durable consumer goods," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 227-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhe Cheng & Xinzhou Wu & Victor Kuzmichev & Dominique Adolphe, 2022. "The Influence of Major Ergonomic Factors on the Demand for Underwear in the Highly Educated Male Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-10, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Hidalgo-Carvajal & Ruth Carrasco-Gallego & Gustavo Morales-Alonso, 2021. "From Goods to Services and from Linear to Circular: The Role of Servitization’s Challenges and Drivers in the Shifting Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Sabina Scarpellini & Jesus Valero‐Gil & José M. Moneva & Michele Andreaus, 2020. "Environmental management capabilities for a “circular eco‐innovation”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1850-1864, July.
    3. Xiaoxiao Zhou & Ryoga Miyauchi & Yuki Inoue, 2023. "Sustainable Fashion Product Innovation: Continuous Value of Apparel Products on Second-Hand Product Trading Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Rocío González-Sánchez & Davide Settembre-Blundo & Anna Maria Ferrari & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2020. "Main Dimensions in the Building of the Circular Supply Chain: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Anne P. M. Velenturf, 2021. "A Framework and Baseline for the Integration of a Sustainable Circular Economy in Offshore Wind," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-41, September.
    6. Margherita Pero & Elisa Arrigo & Antoinette Fionda-Douglas, 2020. "Sustainability in Fashion Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-4, July.
    7. Jan Konietzko & Nancy Bocken & Erik Jan Hultink, 2020. "A Tool to Analyze, Ideate and Develop Circular Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-39, January.
    8. Young Kim & Sungeun Suh, 2022. "The Core Value of Sustainable Fashion: A Case Study on “Market Gredit”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Żaneta Muranko & Catriona Tassell & Anouk Zeeuw van der Laan & Marco Aurisicchio, 2021. "Characterisation and Environmental Value Proposition of Reuse Models for Fast-Moving Consumer Goods: Reusable Packaging and Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-35, March.
    10. Yafeng Han & Tetiana Shevchenko & Bernard Yannou & Meisam Ranjbari & Zahra Shams Esfandabadi & Michael Saidani & Ghada Bouillass & Kseniia Bliumska-Danko & Guohou Li, 2023. "Exploring How Digital Technologies Enable a Circular Economy of Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Gianmarco Bressanelli & Federico Adrodegari & Marco Perona & Nicola Saccani, 2018. "Exploring How Usage-Focused Business Models Enable Circular Economy through Digital Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Kirsten van Dam & Luca Simeone & Duygu Keskin & Brian Baldassarre & Monia Niero & Nicola Morelli, 2020. "Circular Economy in Industrial Design Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Julia L. K. Nußholz, 2017. "Circular Business Models: Defining a Concept and Framing an Emerging Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Daniel Borg & Oksana Mont & Heather Schoonover, 2020. "Consumer Acceptance and Value in Use-Oriented Product-Service Systems: Lessons from Swedish Consumer Goods Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:726-:d:721579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.