IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4110-d359498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bi-Objective Approach to Minimize Makespan and Energy Consumption in Flow Shops with Peak Demand Constraint

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwei Cui

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Biao Lu

    (College of Economic and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

Abstract

With the growing concern of energy shortage and environment pollution, the energy aware operation management problem has emerged as a hot topic in industrial engineering recently. An integrated model consisting of production scheduling, preventive maintenance (PM) planning, and energy controlling is established for the flow shops with the PM constraint and peak demand constraint. The machine’s on/off and the speed level selection are considered to save the energy consumption in this problem. To minimize the makespan and the total energy consumption simultaneously, a multi-objective algorithm founded on NSGA-II is designed to solve the model effectively. The key decision variables are coded into the chromosome, while the others are obtained heuristically using the proposed decoding method when evaluating the chromosome. Numerical experiments were conducted to validate the effectiveness and efficiency by comparing the proposed algorithm and the traditional rules in manufacturing plant. The impacts of constraints on the Pareto frontier are also shown when analyzing the tradeoff between two objectives, which can be used to explicitly assess the energy consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwei Cui & Biao Lu, 2020. "A Bi-Objective Approach to Minimize Makespan and Energy Consumption in Flow Shops with Peak Demand Constraint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4110-:d:359498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    2. Cui, Yunfei & Geng, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Qunxiong & Han, Yongming, 2017. "Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 681-704.
    3. Mansouri, S. Afshin & Aktas, Emel & Besikci, Umut, 2016. "Green scheduling of a two-machine flowshop: Trade-off between makespan and energy consumption," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 772-788.
    4. Niloofar Shoaardebili & Parviz Fattahi, 2015. "Multi-objective meta-heuristics to solve three-stage assembly flow shop scheduling problem with machine availability constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 944-968, February.
    5. Aggoune, Riad, 2004. "Minimizing the makespan for the flow shop scheduling problem with availability constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 534-543, March.
    6. Jing-jing Wang & Ling Wang, 2019. "Decoding methods for the flow shop scheduling with peak power consumption constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 3200-3218, May.
    7. Dababneh, Fadwa & Li, Lin & Sun, Zeyi, 2016. "Peak power demand reduction for combined manufacturing and HVAC system considering heat transfer characteristics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 44-52.
    8. En-da Jiang & Ling Wang, 2019. "An improved multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition for energy-efficient permutation flow shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup time," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(6), pages 1756-1771, March.
    9. Aldowaisan, Tariq & Allahverdi, Ali, 2004. "New heuristics for m-machine no-wait flowshop to minimize total completion time," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 345-352, October.
    10. G. M. Komaki & Shaya Sheikh & Behnam Malakooti, 2019. "Flow shop scheduling problems with assembly operations: a review and new trends," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 2926-2955, May.
    11. Liu, Ying & Dong, Haibo & Lohse, Niels & Petrovic, Sanja, 2016. "A multi-objective genetic algorithm for optimisation of energy consumption and shop floor production performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 259-272.
    12. Aggoune, Riad & Portmann, Marie-Claude, 2006. "Flow shop scheduling problem with limited machine availability: A heuristic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1-2), pages 4-15, February.
    13. Ding, Jian-Ya & Song, Shiji & Wu, Cheng, 2016. "Carbon-efficient scheduling of flow shops by multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 758-771.
    14. Min Dai & Ziwei Zhang & Adriana Giret & Miguel A. Salido, 2019. "An Enhanced Estimation of Distribution Algorithm for Energy-Efficient Job-Shop Scheduling Problems with Transportation Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Kan Fang & Nelson Uhan & Fu Zhao & John Sutherland, 2013. "Flow shop scheduling with peak power consumption constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 115-145, July.
    16. Kubiak, Wieslaw & Blazewicz, Jacek & Formanowicz, Piotr & Breit, Joachim & Schmidt, Gunter, 2002. "Two-machine flow shops with limited machine availability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(3), pages 528-540, February.
    17. Weiwei Cui & Huali Sun & Beixin Xia, 2020. "Integrating production scheduling, maintenance planning and energy controlling for the sustainable manufacturing systems under TOU tariff," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(11), pages 1760-1779, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junhong Qu & Xiaoli Hao, 2022. "Digital Economy, Financial Development, and Energy Poverty Based on Mediating Effects and a Spatial Autocorrelation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Rujapa Nanthapodej & Cheng-Hsiang Liu & Krisanarach Nitisiri & Sirorat Pattanapairoj, 2021. "Hybrid Differential Evolution Algorithm and Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search to Solve Parallel Machine Scheduling to Minimize Energy Consumption in Consideration of Machine-Load Balance Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Yiping Huang & Qin Yang & Jinfeng Liu & Xiao Li & Jie Zhang, 2021. "Sustainable Scheduling of the Production in the Aluminum Furnace Hot Rolling Section with Uncertain Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hajo Terbrack & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2021. "Energy-Oriented Production Planning in Industry: A Systematic Literature Review and Classification Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, December.
    2. Alvarez-Meaza, Izaskun & Zarrabeitia-Bilbao, Enara & Rio-Belver, Rosa-María & Garechana-Anacabe, Gaizka, 2021. "Green scheduling to achieve green manufacturing: Pursuing a research agenda by mapping science," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Foumani, Mehdi & Smith-Miles, Kate, 2019. "The impact of various carbon reduction policies on green flowshop scheduling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 300-315.
    4. Heydar, Mojtaba & Mardaneh, Elham & Loxton, Ryan, 2022. "Approximate dynamic programming for an energy-efficient parallel machine scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 363-380.
    5. Zhou, Shengchao & Jin, Mingzhou & Du, Ni, 2020. "Energy-efficient scheduling of a single batch processing machine with dynamic job arrival times," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Said Aqil & Karam Allali, 2021. "On a bi-criteria flow shop scheduling problem under constraints of blocking and sequence dependent setup time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 615-637, January.
    7. Anghinolfi, Davide & Paolucci, Massimo & Ronco, Roberto, 2021. "A bi-objective heuristic approach for green identical parallel machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 416-434.
    8. Javad Seif & Mohammad Dehghanimohammadabadi & Andrew Junfang Yu, 2020. "Integrated preventive maintenance and flow shop scheduling under uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 852-887, December.
    9. Deming Lei & Youlian Zheng & Xiuping Guo, 2017. "A shuffled frog-leaping algorithm for flexible job shop scheduling with the consideration of energy consumption," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(11), pages 3126-3140, June.
    10. Matthias Gerhard Wichmann & Christoph Johannes & Thomas Stefan Spengler, 2019. "An extension of the general lot-sizing and scheduling problem (GLSP) with time-dependent energy prices," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(5), pages 481-514, July.
    11. Seyed Habib A. Rahmati & Abbas Ahmadi & Kannan Govindan, 2018. "A novel integrated condition-based maintenance and stochastic flexible job shop scheduling problem: simulation-based optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 583-621, October.
    12. Fei Luan & Zongyan Cai & Shuqiang Wu & Shi Qiang Liu & Yixin He, 2019. "Optimizing the Low-Carbon Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem with Discrete Whale Optimization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Lin, Shih-Wei & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2016. "Optimization of makespan for no-wait flowshop scheduling problems using efficient matheuristics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 115-125.
    14. Fatima Benbouzid-Si Tayeb & Karima Benatchba & Abd-Essalam Messiaid, 2018. "Game theory-based integration of scheduling with flexible and periodic maintenance planning in the permutation flowshop sequencing problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 221-255, April.
    15. Wahiba Jomaa & Mansour Eddaly & Bassem Jarboui, 2021. "Variable neighborhood search algorithms for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem with the preventive maintenance," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2525-2542, December.
    16. S Afshin Mansouri & Emel Aktas, 2016. "Minimizing energy consumption and makespan in a two-machine flowshop scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(11), pages 1382-1394, November.
    17. Markus Hilbert & Andreas Dellnitz & Andreas Kleine, 2023. "Production planning under RTP, TOU and PPA considering a redox flow battery storage system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(2), pages 1409-1436, September.
    18. Weiwei Cui & Lin Li & Zhiqiang Lu, 2019. "Energy‐efficient scheduling for sustainable manufacturing systems with renewable energy resources," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(2), pages 154-173, March.
    19. Kacem, Imed & Chu, Chengbin, 2008. "Efficient branch-and-bound algorithm for minimizing the weighted sum of completion times on a single machine with one availability constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 138-150, March.
    20. Wu, Xueqi & Che, Ada, 2019. "A memetic differential evolution algorithm for energy-efficient parallel machine scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 155-165.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4110-:d:359498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.