IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p75-d300284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Evolution of Knowledge Sharing Behavior among Enterprises in the Cluster Innovation Network Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodan Kong

    (Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)

  • Qi Xu

    (Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China)

  • Tao Zhu

    (Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO171TU, UK)

Abstract

Knowledge sharing behavior based on the cluster innovation network has become the primary measure for enterprises to realize sustainable innovation. In order to promote the proactive knowledge sharing behavior among enterprises in the long term, the dynamic evolutionary process and law of knowledge sharing in the network need to be further studied. As different from the hypothesis of the rational man in the classical game theory, this paper establishes an evolutionary game model of knowledge sharing behavior in the cluster innovation network based on the evolutionary game theory, and discusses how the bounded rational enterprises can achieve the evolutionary equilibrium through continuously adaptive learning and strategy optimization, further explores the influence factors on the evolutionary trajectory. Combined with mathematical derivation and simulation analysis, the following results are obtained: over time, the dynamic evolution of knowledge sharing behavior in the cluster innovation network is influenced by initial states of the system, but can always reach the evolutionary stable equilibrium; factors such as synergy revenue have a positive impact on the evolutionary results, while factors such as opportunity interest have a negative impact on the evolutionary results; the factor of revenue distribution has a U-shape relationship with the evolutionary results, and the factor of direct revenue has no effect on the results. The results are expected to have an implication for improving the sustainable innovation development of enterprises in the cluster innovation network.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodan Kong & Qi Xu & Tao Zhu, 2019. "Dynamic Evolution of Knowledge Sharing Behavior among Enterprises in the Cluster Innovation Network Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:75-:d:300284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/75/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/75/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Se-Yeon Ahn & So-Hyung Kim, 2017. "What Makes Firms Innovative? The Role of Social Capital in Corporate Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Torben Klarl, 2014. "Knowledge diffusion and knowledge transfer revisited: two sides of the medal," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 737-760, September.
    3. Michelle Greenwood & Harry Buren III, 2010. "Trust and Stakeholder Theory: Trustworthiness in the Organisation–Stakeholder Relationship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 425-438, September.
    4. Si-Hua Chen, 2016. "The Influencing Factors of Enterprise Sustainable Innovation: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Stahn, Hubert, 2000. "A remark on rational expectation equilibria with incomplete markets and real assets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 441-448, May.
    6. Nisvan Erkal & Deborah Minehart, 2014. "Optimal Technology Sharing Strategies in Dynamic Games of R&D," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 149-177, March.
    7. Cao, Bin & Han, Shui-hua & Jin, Zhen, 2016. "Modeling of knowledge transmission by considering the level of forgetfulness in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 277-287.
    8. Hayter, Christopher S., 2016. "Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 475-490.
    9. Samaddar, Subhashish & Kadiyala, Savitha S., 2006. "An analysis of interorganizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 192-210, April.
    10. Li, Jingjing & Zhang, Yumei & Man, Jiayu & Zhou, Yun & Wu, Xiaojun, 2017. "SISL and SIRL: Two knowledge dissemination models with leader nodes on cooperative learning networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 740-749.
    11. Junghee Han, 2017. "Technology Commercialization through Sustainable Knowledge Sharing from University-Industry Collaborations, with a Focus on Patent Propensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Miri Kim & Jaeki Song & Jason Triche, 2015. "Toward an integrated framework for innovation in service: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 533-546, June.
    13. Frey, Erwin, 2010. "Evolutionary game theory: Theoretical concepts and applications to microbial communities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(20), pages 4265-4298.
    14. King, John M.C., 2007. "The Airbus 380 and Boeing 787: A role in the recovery of the airline transport market," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 16-22.
    15. Si-hua Chen, 2017. "An Evolutionary Game Model of Knowledge Workers’ Counterproductive Work Behaviors Based on Preferences," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-11, January.
    16. Lingna Lin & He Wang, 2019. "Dynamic incentive model of knowledge sharing in construction project team based on differential game," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(12), pages 2084-2096, December.
    17. Zhang-sheng Jiang & Yun-hong Hao, 2013. "Game analysis of technology innovation alliance stability based on knowledge transfer," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 403-421, December.
    18. Hongyu Liu & Shukuan Zhao & Ouyang Xin, 2019. "Analysis on the Evolution Path and Hotspot of Knowledge Innovation Study Based on Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Qian Li & Yuanfei Kang, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing Willingness and Leakage Risk: An Evolutional Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    20. DeBresson, Chris & Amesse, Fernand, 1991. "Networks of innovators :A review and introduction to the issue," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 363-379, October.
    21. Zhu, He & Ma, Jing, 2018. "Knowledge diffusion in complex networks by considering time-varying information channels," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 494(C), pages 225-235.
    22. Denis Harrisson & Murielle Laberge, 2002. "Innovation, Identities and Resistance: The Social Construction of An Innovation Network," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 497-521, June.
    23. Nonaka, Ikujiro & Kodama, Mitsuru & Hirose, Ayano & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2014. "Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 137-146.
    24. Wang, Haiying & Wang, Jun & Ding, Liting & Wei, Wei, 2017. "Knowledge transmission model with consideration of self-learning mechanism in complex networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 304(C), pages 83-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuochen Li & Xinyu Zhou, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Government–Industry–University–Institute Collaborative Innovation in Green Technology Based on Game–Based Cellular Automata," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Delio I. Castaneda & Sergio Cuellar, 2021. "Knowledge Sharing in Business Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Ling Cao & Jie Yin, 2023. "Research on Sharing Behavior Strategy of Cultural Heritage Institutions Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Ming Luo & Ruguo Fan & Yingqing Zhang & Chaoping Zhu, 2020. "Environmental Governance Cooperative Behavior among Enterprises with Reputation Effect Based on Complex Networks Evolutionary Game Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Haiying & Wang, Jun & Small, Michael, 2018. "Knowledge transmission model with differing initial transmission and retransmission process," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 478-488.
    2. Liao, Shi-Gen & Yi, Shu-Ping, 2021. "Modeling and analyzing knowledge transmission process considering free-riding behavior of knowledge acquisition: A waterborne disease approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 569(C).
    3. Liao, Shi-Gen & Yi, Shu-Ping, 2021. "Modeling and analysis knowledge transmission process in complex networks by considering internalization mechanism," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Wang, Sixin & Mei, Jun & Xia, Dan & Yang, Zhanying & Hu, Junhao, 2022. "Finite-time optimal feedback control mechanism for knowledge transmission in complex networks via model predictive control," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Wang, Haiying & Wang, Jun & Small, Michael & Moore, Jack Murdoch, 2019. "Review mechanism promotes knowledge transmission in complex networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 113-125.
    6. Zhu, He & Ma, Jing, 2018. "Knowledge diffusion in complex networks by considering time-varying information channels," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 494(C), pages 225-235.
    7. Wang, Haiying & Moore, Jack Murdoch & Wang, Jun & Small, Michael, 2021. "The distinct roles of initial transmission and retransmission in the persistence of knowledge in complex networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    8. Zenghui Yue & Haiyun Xu & Guoting Yuan & Yan Qi, 2022. "Modeling knowledge diffusion in the disciplinary citation network based on differential dynamics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7593-7613, December.
    9. Robertson, Jeandri & Caruana, Albert & Ferreira, Caitlin, 2023. "Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    10. Song, Le & Ma, Yinghong, 2022. "Evaluating tacit knowledge diffusion with algebra matrix algorithm based social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    11. Mei, Jun & Wang, Sixin & Xia, Dan & Hu, Junhao, 2022. "Global stability and optimal control analysis of a knowledge transmission model in multilayer networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    12. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Sawyer, Steve, 2019. "Networks of innovation: the sociotechnical assemblage of tabletop computing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(S).
    13. Huo, Liang’an & Chen, Sijing, 2020. "Rumor propagation model with consideration of scientific knowledge level and social reinforcement in heterogeneous network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    14. Teimuraz Gogokhia & George Berulava, 2021. "Business environment reforms, innovation and firm productivity in transition economies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 221-245, June.
    15. Sitnicki Maksym, 2018. "Exploration of the role of business schools in the development of world-class research universities," Technology audit and production reserves, 1(39) 2018, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 1(5(39)), pages 36-45.
    16. Wei Peng & Baogui Xin & Yekyung Kwon, 2019. "Optimal Strategies of Product Price, Quality, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Jianyu Han & Min He & Honglin Xie & Tao Ding, 2022. "The Impact of Scientific and Technological Innovation on High-Quality Economic Development in the Yangtze River Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Chi-Yo Huang & Min-Jen Yang & Jeen-Fong Li & Hueiling Chen, 2021. "A DANP-Based NDEA-MOP Approach to Evaluating the Patent Commercialization Performance of Industry–Academic Collaborations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-26, September.
    19. Liming Zhao & Haihong Zhang & Wenqing Wu, 2019. "Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 657-685, May.
    20. Hao, Miao & Lyv, Kangjuan & Li, Shiyuan & Hu, Wuyang, 2021. "How does environmental regulation affect firm innovation? Evidence based on corporate life cycle," MPRA Paper 110971, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:75-:d:300284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.