IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10192-d1180644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Sharing Behavior Strategy of Cultural Heritage Institutions Based on Evolutionary Game Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Cao

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Jie Yin

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

With the accelerated digitalization of China’s cultural heritage conservation, cultural heritage data sharing has been gaining more and more attention as an essential link in cultural heritage conservation and transmission. However, there are many problems in cultural heritage sharing, one of which is the low willingness of institutions to share among themselves and the seriousness of information silos. To motivate more cultural heritage institutions to participate in platform sharing and promote long-term, stable data sharing behavior, the dynamic evolution process and the law of institutions’ sharing behavior in cultural heritage sharing platforms must be further studied. This paper constructs an evolutionary game model based on evolutionary game theory to explore the evolutionary paths of finite rational cultural heritage institutions to reach a stable strategy, discusses the relevant factors affecting these evolutionary paths, and conducts simulation experiments with the help of MATLAB. This paper finds that the sharing behavior of institutions in cultural heritage sharing platforms is affected by the initial state over time. The free-riding penalty of non-sharing parties, the coefficient of synergistic benefit, the data sharing volume, and the proportion of data complementarity have positive effects on the sharing behavior of cultural heritage institutions; meanwhile, the fixed sharing costs and the loss of gains of sharing parties have an adverse impact on the sharing behavior of cultural heritage institutions. The findings of this paper are essential for solving the cultural heritage sharing dilemma, improving the competitiveness of cultural heritage institutions, and promoting the sustainable development of cultural heritage sharing platforms, which can help promote the development of cultural heritage and help the implementation of cultural digitalization strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Cao & Jie Yin, 2023. "Research on Sharing Behavior Strategy of Cultural Heritage Institutions Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10192-:d:1180644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziyu Chen & Jili Kong, 2023. "Research on Shared Logistics Decision Based on Evolutionary Game and Income Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Daniel Friedman, 1998. "On economic applications of evolutionary game theory," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 15-43.
    3. Yanhui Li & He Xu & Yan Zhao & Tingsong Wang, 2021. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Information Sharing in Fresh Product Supply Chain," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-11, March.
    4. Erica Del Vacchio & Francesco Bifulco, 2022. "Blockchain in Cultural Heritage: Insights from Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Huan Yang & Ling Qiu & Xin Fu, 2021. "Toward Cultural Heritage Sustainability through Participatory Planning Based on Investigation of the Value Perceptions and Preservation Attitudes: Qing Mu Chuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Changjuan Zheng & Xu Huang & Ying Xu, 2023. "The Impact of Blockchain on Enterprises Sharing Real Data Based on Dynamic Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-34, June.
    7. Huimin Li & Fuqiang Wang & Lunyan Wang & Limin Su & Chengyi Zhang, 2020. "The Stochastic Evolution Game of Knowledge Sharing in the Infrastructure PPP Supply Chain Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-17, October.
    8. Volker Benndorf & Hans‐Theo Normann, 2018. "The Willingness to Sell Personal Data," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 120(4), pages 1260-1278, October.
    9. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    10. Meili Lu & Yujia Gao & Qin Wan, 2021. "Research on Evolutionary Game of Collaborative Innovation in Supply Chain under Digitization Background," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-18, November.
    11. Xiaodan Kong & Qi Xu & Tao Zhu, 2019. "Dynamic Evolution of Knowledge Sharing Behavior among Enterprises in the Cluster Innovation Network Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Qing Lin & Zheng Lian, 2018. "On Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage in China from the Intellectual Property Rights Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Miao Hao & Hong Wang & Kai Gao & Fabio Tramontana, 2022. "The Multiagent Evolutionary Game Research of Enterprise Resource Sharing on a Shared Manufacturing Platform," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-19, December.
    14. Changqing Sun & Hong Chen & Ruihua Liao, 2021. "Research on Incentive Mechanism and Strategy Choice for Passing on Intangible Cultural Heritage from Masters to Apprentices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Ralph A. Heidl & H. Kevin Steensma & Corey Phelps, 2014. "Divisive Faultlines and the Unplanned Dissolutions of Multipartner Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1351-1371, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changqing Sun & Hong Chen & Ruihua Liao, 2021. "Research on Incentive Mechanism and Strategy Choice for Passing on Intangible Cultural Heritage from Masters to Apprentices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Jin, Tao & Jiang, Yulian & Liu, Xingwen, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of the impact of dynamic dual credit policy on new energy vehicles after subsidy cancellation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    3. Xiongwei Quan & Gaoshan Zuo & Helin Sun, 2022. "Risk Perception Thresholds and Their Impact on the Behavior of Nearby Residents in Waste to Energy Project Conflict: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Zhuozhuo Gou & Yansong Deng, 2021. "Dynamic Model of Collaboration in Multi-Agent System Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Fisher, Eric ON. & Kakkar, Vikas, 2004. "On the evolution of comparative advantage in matching models," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 169-193, October.
    6. Faggini, Marisa & Parziale, Anna, 2011. "Fitness landscape and tax planning: NK model for fiscal federalism," MPRA Paper 33770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Matthew McGinty, 2010. "International Environmental Agreements as Evolutionary Games," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(2), pages 251-269, February.
    8. Dijkstra, Bouwe R. & de Vries, Frans P., 2006. "Location choice by households and polluting firms: An evolutionary approach," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 425-446, February.
    9. Kuechle, Graciela, 2011. "Persistence and heterogeneity in entrepreneurship: An evolutionary game theoretic analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 458-471, July.
    10. Qianwen Wu & Qiangqiang Wang & Yongwu Dai, 2023. "Analysis of Strategy Selection in Third-Party Governance of Rural Environmental Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Jie Jin & Jun Zhuang & Qiuhong Zhao, 2018. "Supervision after Certification: An Evolutionary Game Analysis for Chinese Environmental Labeled Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Yingxia Xue & Fang Liu & Guangbin Wang & Jungang Shao, 2023. "Research on Strategy Evolution of Contractor and Resident in Construction Stage of Old Community Renovation Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Wei Duan & Hengli Cao & Desheng Xu, 2023. "Research on the Impact of New Parts Price Increase on the Stability of Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    14. Serdar Ş. Güner, 2004. "Aegean Territorial Waters Conflict: An Evolutionary Narrative," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 21(4), pages 297-312, September.
    15. Yingxiu Zhao & Sitong Zhou, 2023. "The Impact of Two-Sided Market Platforms on Participants’ Trading Strategies: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Mansoor Saburov, 2022. "On Discrete-Time Replicator Equations with Nonlinear Payoff Functions," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 643-661, June.
    17. Huarong Zhou & Shengbing He & Qinke Lyu, 2022. "A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of contract manufacturer's brand strategy decisions in global value chains," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2237-2248, September.
    18. Yang, Kun & Wang, Wan & Xiong, Wan, 2021. "Promoting the sustainable development of infrastructure projects through responsible innovation: An evolutionary game analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Tuochen Li & Xinyu Zhou, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Government–Industry–University–Institute Collaborative Innovation in Green Technology Based on Game–Based Cellular Automata," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Caihua Zhou & Hualin Xie & Xinmin Zhang, 2019. "Does Fiscal Policy Promote Third-Party Environmental Pollution Control in China? An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10192-:d:1180644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.