IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p210-d302110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Expansion and Growth Boundaries in an Oasis City in an Arid Region: A Case Study of Jiayuguan City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Ren

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

  • Wei Zhou

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Xuelu Liu

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Liang Zhou

    (College of Faculty of Geomatics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jing Guo

    (Department of Ecological Economy, Qinghai Academy of Social Sciences, Xining 81000, China)

  • Yonghao Wang

    (Department of Land Space Planning, Gansu Academy of Natural Resources Planning, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Yanjun Guan

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jingtian Mao

    (School of Civil Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

  • Yuhan Huang

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Rongrong Ma

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

China is undergoing rapid urbanization, which has caused undesirable urban sprawl and ecological deterioration. Urban growth boundaries (UGBs) are an effective measure to restrict the irrational urban sprawl and protect the green space. However, the delimiting method and control measures of the UGBs is at the exploratory stage in China. In this paper, a cellular automata model based on multi-criteria evaluation (MCE-CA) was proposed to delimit the UGBs. The MCE-CA model considers influencing factors related to urban growth and generates UGBs based on spatiotemporally dynamic simulations. The MCE-CA model was applied to generate the UGBs of Jiayuguan City in 2020 and 2030, the results show that the simulation accuracy is higher than 0.8 and the compactness increases to 0.23, which demonstrates that the MCE-CA model is an effective model for delimiting UGBs. Moreover, the MCE-CA model can corporate the contradiction between environmental protection and urban development, promoting urban smart growth and sustainable development. UGBs is an effective tool for China to realize ecological civilization construction and improve the spatial governance ability, and the MCE-CA model can be used to assist planners in delimiting future UGBs, this study provides a methodological reference for future research of UGBs in Chinese cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Ren & Wei Zhou & Xuelu Liu & Liang Zhou & Jing Guo & Yonghao Wang & Yanjun Guan & Jingtian Mao & Yuhan Huang & Rongrong Ma, 2019. "Urban Expansion and Growth Boundaries in an Oasis City in an Arid Region: A Case Study of Jiayuguan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:210-:d:302110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/210/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/210/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deng, Xiangzheng & Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott & Uchida, Emi, 2008. "Growth, population and industrialization, and urban land expansion of China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 96-115, January.
    2. Cho, Seong-Hoon & Chen, Zhuo & Yen, Steven T. & Eastwood, David B., 2006. "Estimating Effects of an Urban Growth Boundary on Land Development," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(2), pages 287-298, August.
    3. Dempsey, Judith A. & Plantinga, Andrew J., 2013. "How well do urban growth boundaries contain development? Results for Oregon using a difference-in-difference estimator," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 996-1007.
    4. Liang Zhou & Qinke Sun & Xuewei Dang & Shaohua Wang, 2019. "Comparison on Multi-Scale Urban Expansion Derived from Nightlight Imagery between China and India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. F Wu & C J Webster, 1998. "Simulation of Land Development through the Integration of Cellular Automata and Multicriteria Evaluation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 25(1), pages 103-126, February.
    6. Saaty, Thomas L., 2003. "Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 85-91, February.
    7. Chuanglin Fang & Zhenbo Wang, 2015. "Quantitative Diagnoses and Comprehensive Evaluations of the Rationality of Chinese Urban Development Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Xu, Ze & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Li, Chu, 2019. "Exploring urban green spaces in China: Spatial patterns, driving factors and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Penghui Jiang & Qianwen Cheng & Yuan Gong & Liyan Wang & Yunqian Zhang & Liang Cheng & Manchun Li & Jiancheng Lu & Yuewei Duan & Qiuhao Huang & Dong Chen, 2016. "Using Urban Development Boundaries to Constrain Uncontrolled Urban Sprawl in China," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(6), pages 1321-1343, November.
    10. Yilun Liu & Yueming Hu & Shaoqiu Long & Luo Liu & Xiaoping Liu, 2017. "Analysis of the Effectiveness of Urban Land-Use-Change Models Based on the Measurement of Spatio-Temporal, Dynamic Urban Growth: A Cellular Automata Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Myung-Jin Jun, 2004. "The Effects of Portland's Urban Growth Boundary on Urban Development Patterns and Commuting," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 1333-1348, June.
    12. Biao Zheng & Guangsheng Liu & Hongmei Wang & Yingxuan Cheng & Zongliang Lu & Huawei Liu & Xuexin Zhu & Miaomiao Wang & Lu Yi, 2018. "Study on the Delimitation of the Urban Development Boundary in a Special Economic Zone: A Case Study of the Central Urban Area of Doumen in Zhuhai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Turnbull, Geoffrey K., 2004. "Urban growth controls: transitional dynamics of development fees and growth boundaries," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 215-237, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanxuan Zhang & Xiangjuan Zhao & Jun Ren & Wenjing Hai & Jing Guo & Chengying Li & Yapei Gao, 2023. "Research on the Slope Gradient Effect and Driving Factors of Construction Land in Urban Agglomerations in the Upper Yellow River: A Case Study of the Lanzhou–Xining Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-31, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joachim Zietz & Heiko Kirchhain, 2023. "Determinants of Urban land development: A panel study for U.S. metropolitan areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1486-1501, July.
    2. Shen, Liyin & Cheng, Guangyu & Du, Xiaoyun & Meng, Conghui & Ren, Yitian & Wang, Jinhuan, 2022. "Can urban agglomeration bring “1 + 1 > 2Effect”? A perspective of land resource carrying capacity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Haoying Han & Chen Huang & Kun-Hyuck Ahn & Xianfan Shu & Liyun Lin & Derong Qiu, 2017. "The Effects of Greenbelt Policies on Land Development: Evidence from the Deregulation of the Greenbelt in the Seoul Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Marz, Waldemar & Goetzke, Frank, 2022. "CAFE in the city — A spatial analysis of fuel economy standards," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Tan, Ronghui & Xu, Shuxian, 2023. "Urban growth boundary and subway development: A theoretical model for estimating their joint effect on urban land price," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    6. Zhuzhou Zhuang & Kaiyuan Li & Jiaxun Liu & Qianwen Cheng & Yu Gao & Jinxia Shan & Lingyan Cai & Qiuhao Huang & Yanming Chen & Dong Chen, 2016. "China’s New Urban Space Regulation Policies: A Study of Urban Development Boundary Delineations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Marin V. Geshkov & Joseph S. DeSalvo, 2012. "The Effect Of Land-Use Controls On The Spatial Size Of U.S. Urbanized Areas," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 648-675, October.
    8. Tan, Ronghui & Liu, Pengcheng & Zhou, Kehao & He, Qingsong, 2022. "Evaluating the effectiveness of development-limiting boundary control policy: Spatial difference-in-difference analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Lingyu Zhang & Yaolin Liu & Ying Jing & Yang Zhang, 2022. "How Does Quota-Oriented Land Use Planning Affect Urban Expansion? A Spatial Analysis of 280 Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Kehao Zhou & Ronghui Tan, 2022. "More Than Thirty Years of Environmentally Sensitive Area Loss in Wuhan: What Lessons Have We Learned from Urban Containment Policy?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Jia-He Zhou & Yu-Ming Zhu & Lei He & Hao-Jing Song & Bing-Xu Mu & Fen Lyu, 2022. "Recognizing and managing construction land reduction barriers for sustainable land use in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14074-14105, December.
    12. Siqi Yi & Yong Zhou & Qing Li, 2022. "A New Perspective for Urban Development Boundary Delineation Based on the MCR Model and CA-Markov Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Jae Hong Kim, 2013. "Measuring the Containment and Spillover Effects of Urban Growth Boundaries: The Case of the Portland Metropolitan Area," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 650-675, December.
    14. Jinyao Lin & Tongli Chen & Qiazi Han, 2018. "Simulating and Predicting the Impacts of Light Rail Transit Systems on Urban Land Use by Using Cellular Automata: A Case Study of Dongguan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Wentao Niu & Ting Nie & Xiao Chen & Tianxi Wang & Jingyi Shi & Zhenzhen Xu & Hexiong Zhang, 2022. "Understanding the Corrective Effect of the Urban Growth Boundary Policy on Land Finance Dependence of Local Governments in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-31, April.
    16. Yingtao Wu & Maogang Tang & Zhonghao Zhang & Baijun Wu, 2019. "Whether Urban Development and Ecological Protection Can Achieve a Win-Win Situation—The Nonlinear Relationship between Urbanization and Ecosystem Service Value in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    17. Zhang, Yingjie & Zhang, Tianzheng & Zeng, Yingxiang & Cheng, Baodong & Li, Hongxun, 2021. "Designating National Forest Cities in China: Does the policy improve the urban living environment?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Pankaj Bajracharya & Selima Sultana, 2022. "Examining the Use of Urban Growth Boundary for Future Urban Expansion of Chattogram, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Fang, Lei, 2022. "Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1006-1013.
    20. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:210-:d:302110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.