IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p129-d301064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accessibility in Practice: 20-Minute City as a Sustainability Planning Goal

Author

Listed:
  • Denise Capasso Da Silva

    (School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • David A. King

    (School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA)

  • Shea Lemar

    (School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA)

Abstract

Cities can enhance their sustainability planning by prioritizing accessibility as a performance metric for transportation planning. In this context, accessibility measures the ease of reaching opportunities and captures more characteristics of sustainable cities than the more conventionally used mobility metrics, focusing on the overall ability to move and generally recommending faster speeds to overcome distance. However, how cities can prioritize accessibility in planning is understudied. This research presents a case of Tempe, Arizona, putting accessibility into practice through a 20-min lens. Using a 20-min threshold for all modes, the city aims to promote travel for daily activities that is less reliant on private autos. The analysis presented here documents the challenges that planners face when planning for accessibility. The challenges range from technical points to decisions that need to be made about the quality of the built environment. The analysis also shows that Tempe, which is a classically suburban city of wide roads and single-family homes that was built around the automobile, is highly accessible by a 20-min metric by bicycling, walking and transit. These results suggest that planners focus on street network improvements that prioritize accessibility as part of a sustainability strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Denise Capasso Da Silva & David A. King & Shea Lemar, 2019. "Accessibility in Practice: 20-Minute City as a Sustainability Planning Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:129-:d:301064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cecilia Silva & Paulo Pinho, 2010. "The Structural Accessibility Layer (SAL): Revealing how Urban Structure Constrains Travel Choice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(11), pages 2735-2752, November.
    2. Bertolini, L. & le Clercq, F. & Kapoen, L., 2005. "Sustainable accessibility: a conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 207-220, May.
    3. Marco te Brömmelstroet & Carey Curtis & Anders Larsson & Dimitris Milakis, 2016. "Strengths and weaknesses of accessibility instruments in planning practice: technological rules based on experiential workshops," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1175-1196, June.
    4. Elisa Borowski & Alireza Ermagun & David Levinson, 2018. "Disparity of Access: Variations in Transit Service by Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Auto Availability," Working Papers 175, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    5. Unknown, 2005. "Forward," 2005 Conference: Slovenia in the EU - Challenges for Agriculture, Food Science and Rural Affairs, November 10-11, 2005, Moravske Toplice, Slovenia 183804, Slovenian Association of Agricultural Economists (DAES).
    6. Silva, Cecília & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Milakis, Dimitris & Papa, Enrica, 2017. "Accessibility instruments in planning practice: Bridging the implementation gap," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 135-145.
    7. Curtis, Carey, 2008. "Planning for sustainable accessibility: The implementation challenge," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 104-112, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. João Monteiro & Nuno Sousa & Eduardo Natividade-Jesus & João Coutinho-Rodrigues, 2022. "Benchmarking City Layouts—A Methodological Approach and an Accessibility Comparison between a Real City and the Garden City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Mansour, Shawky & Alahmadi, Mohammed & Abulibdeh, Ammar, 2022. "Spatial assessment of audience accessibility to historical monuments and museums in Qatar during the 2022 FIFA World Cup," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 116-129.
    3. Pan, Alexandra & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2021. "Strategies to Overcome Transportation Barriers for Rent Burdened Oakland Residents," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt327773q9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik & Leape, Jonathan & Villegas Carrasquilla, Mónica & Peñas Arana, Maria Claudia & Toro Gonzalez, Daniel & Canon Rubiano, Leonardo & Salas Barón, Eliana & Martinez, Paulo, 2022. "Mapping the transit network of greater Cartagena with mobile phones: Coverage, accessibility, and informality," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Petter Næss & Harpa Stefansdottir & Sebastian Peters & Michał Czepkiewicz & Jukka Heinonen, 2021. "Residential Location and Travel in the Reykjavik Capital Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kinigadner, Julia & Büttner, Benjamin, 2021. "How accessibility instruments contribute to a low carbon mobility transition: Lessons from planning practice in the Munich region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 157-167.
    2. Papa, Enrica & Coppola, Pierluigi & Angiello, Gennaro & Carpentieri, Gerardo, 2017. "The learning process of accessibility instrument developers: Testing the tools in planning practice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 108-120.
    3. Silva, Cecília & Patatas, Tiago & Amante, Ana, 2017. "Evaluating the usefulness of the structural accessibility layer for planning practice – Planning practitioners’ perception," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 137-149.
    4. Varvara Nikulina & David Simon & Henrik Ny & Henrikke Baumann, 2019. "Context-Adapted Urban Planning for Rapid Transitioning of Personal Mobility towards Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-37, February.
    5. Lopes, André Soares & Cavalcante, Camila Bandeira & Vale, David Sousa & Loureiro, Carlos Felipe Grangeiro, 2020. "Convergence of planning practices towards LUT integration: Seeking evidences in a developing country," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Kinigadner, Julia & Büttner, Benjamin & Wulfhorst, Gebhard & Vale, David, 2020. "Planning for low carbon mobility: Impacts of transport interventions and location on carbon-based accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Pajares, Elias & Büttner, Benjamin & Jehle, Ulrike & Nichols, Aaron & Wulfhorst, Gebhard, 2021. "Accessibility by proximity: Addressing the lack of interactive accessibility instruments for active mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Gil Solá, Ana & Vilhelmson, Bertil & Larsson, Anders, 2018. "Understanding sustainable accessibility in urban planning: Themes of consensus, themes of tension," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Pietro Lanzini & Andrea Stocchetti, 2017. "The evolution of the conceptual basis for the assessment of urban mobility sustainability impacts," Working Papers 02, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    10. Wulfhorst, Gebhard & Büttner, Benjamin & Ji, Chenyi, 2017. "The TUM Accessibility Atlas as a tool for supporting policies of sustainable mobility in metropolitan regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 121-136.
    11. Yenisetty, Pavan Teja & Bahadure, Pankaj, 2021. "Assessing accessibility to ASFs from bus stops using distance measures: Case of two Indian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Beukers, Els & Bertolini, Luca & Te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2014. "Using cost benefit analysis as a learning process: identifying interventions for improving communication and trust," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 61-72.
    13. Marco Fasan & Jessica Labriola & Pier Paolo Pentucci, 2019. "Accessibilità e programmazione dei trasporti interregionali: una proposta di metodo," Note di Ricerca 03, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    14. Silva, Cecília & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Milakis, Dimitris & Papa, Enrica, 2017. "Accessibility instruments in planning practice: Bridging the implementation gap," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 135-145.
    15. Ana Gil Solá & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2018. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Cyrille Genre-Grandpierre & Alena Melnikava & Serigne Gueye & Philippe Michelon, 2021. "OPTIDENS: An optimization model to explore the conditions of possibility of slow but accessible urban areas," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 912-928, May.
    17. Salonen, Maria & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2013. "Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 143-153.
    18. van Geet, Marijn Thomas & Lenferink, Sander & Arts, Jos & Leendertse, Wim, 2019. "Understanding the ongoing struggle for land use and transport integration: Institutional incongruence in the Dutch national planning process," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 84-100.
    19. Vega, Amaya, 2012. "Using Place Rank to measure sustainable accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 411-418.
    20. Chaoren Lu, 2014. "The role of sustainability policy in influencing service innovation. a case study of Changzhou BRT system," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 167-168.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:129-:d:301064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.