IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1371-d211234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodology for Determining the Profitability Index of Real Estate Initiatives Involving Public–Private Partnerships. A Case Study: The Integrated Intervention Programs in Rome

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrizio Battisti

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Flaminia 359, 00196 Rome, Italy)

  • Orazio Campo

    (Department of Architecture and Design, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Flaminia 359, 00196 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

In the European Union, real estate initiatives involving public–private partnerships (PPPs) are characterized by the payment of a charge, which is generally used for public purposes (and works). In Italy, since the 1990s, PPPs have also been used to start negotiated initiatives giving the possibility of modifying town planning forecasts. Such initiatives are aimed at increasing the value of private properties and, through the charge, financing public works. This charge was regulated only in 2014 with the change of Article 16, paragraph 4, point d-ter of the Presidential Decree 380/2001 (Consolidated building law) and was named the “extraordinary urbanization contribution” (or simply the “extraordinary contribution”). The extraordinary contribution makes it possible to finance public works with private monetary resources. The amount of the extraordinary contribution is not less than 50% of the capital gain that is produced by real estate initiatives concerning modifications to town planning forecasts. A crucial issue of the this kind of PPPs has always been the appraisal of the capital gain of real estate initiatives due to changes in town planning forecasts. The factors to be considered while evaluating the extraordinary contribution, the appraisal tools and procedures to be used in assessing the capital gain are not indicated at regulatory level. However, an over 20 years’ practice has been consolidating the use of an analytical procedure for the appraisal of the transformation value to be used in evaluating the extraordinary contribution. In this procedure, the evaluation of the profitability index of real estate initiatives appears critical: in fact, the capital gain depends upon this element. At the same time, this topic is substantially neglected by the scientific debate. In this paper, a methodology has been defined, which is structured on the Build-Up Method and allows the profitability index (or rate of return) of a real estate initiative to be evaluated. Through a test, the developed methodology has been used in a case study: the appraisal of the extraordinary contribution in three integrated intervention programs in the city of Rome.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo, 2019. "A Methodology for Determining the Profitability Index of Real Estate Initiatives Involving Public–Private Partnerships. A Case Study: The Integrated Intervention Programs in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1371-:d:211234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stuart Fletcher, 1993. "Portfolio Considerations in Commingled Real Estate Funds," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 8(2), pages 171-188.
    2. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 855-866.
    3. Maria Bostenaru Dan, 2018. "Decision Making Based on Benefit-Costs Analysis: Costs of Preventive Retrofit versus Costs of Repair after Earthquake Hazards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Fabrizio Battisti & Maria Rosaria Guarini, 2017. "Public interest evaluation in negotiated public-private partnership," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 54-89.
    5. Carlo Alberto Magni, 2015. "Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation," Department of Economics 0050, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    6. Mario Massari & Francesco Roncaglio & Laura Zanetti, 2008. "On the Equivalence between the APV and the wacc Approach in a Growing Leveraged Firm," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 14(1), pages 152-162, January.
    7. Dennis R. Capozza & Sohan Lee, 1996. "Portfolio Characteristics and Net Asset Values in REITs," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 29(s1), pages 520-526, April.
    8. Alain Chaney & Martin Hoesli, 2015. "Transaction-Based and Appraisal-Based Capitalization Rate Determinants," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 1-43.
    9. Alain Chaney & Martin Hoesli, 2010. "The interest rate sensitivity of real estate," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 61-85, May.
    10. Lev, Baruch, 1974. "On the Association between Operating Leverage and Risk," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 627-641, September.
    11. Allen, Marcus T & Madura, Jeff & Springer, Thomas M, 2000. "REIT Characteristics and the Sensitivity of REIT Returns," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 141-152, September.
    12. Benedetto Manganelli, 2015. "Real Estate Investing," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-06397-3, December.
    13. K. C. Chan & Patric H. Hendershott & Anthony B. Sanders, 1990. "Risk and Return on Real Estate: Evidence from Equity REITs," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 18(4), pages 431-452, December.
    14. G. Donald Jud & Daniel T. Winkler, 1995. "The Capitalization Rate of Commercial Properties and Market Returns," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 10(5), pages 509-518.
    15. Doina Chichernea & Norm Miller & Jeff Fisher & Bob White & Michael Sklarz, 2008. "ACross-Sectional Analysis of CapRates by MSA," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 30(3), pages 249-292.
    16. Brent W. Ambrose & Hugh O. Nourse, 1993. "Factors Influencing Capitalization Rates," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 8(2), pages 221-238.
    17. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Małgorzata Dudzińska & Barbara Prus & Radosław Cellmer & Stanisław Bacior & Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Anna Klimach & Agnieszka Trystuła, 2020. "The Impact of Flood Risk on the Activity of the Residential Land Market in a Polish Cultural Heritage Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Chan Young Park & Wooyong Jung & Seung H. Han, 2020. "Risk Perception Gaps Between Construction Investors and Financial Investors of International Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Fathi Abdellatif Belhouadjeb & Abdallah Boumakhleb & Abdelhalim Toaiba & Abdelghafour Doghbage & Benbader Habib & Hassen Boukerker & Enrique Murgueitio & Walid Soufan & Mohamad Isam Almadani & Belkace, 2022. "The Forage Plantation Program between Desertification Mitigation and Livestock Feeding: An Economic Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Anqi Wang & Yanhua An & Shuhua Yu, 2023. "Research on the Evaluation of Green Technology Renovation Measurement for Multi-Storey Houses in Severe Cold Regions Based on Entropy-Weight-TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Andrea Bassi & Monica Moscatelli, 2020. "Property Value and Sustainability. The Future of Living: Focus on Short-Term Rents in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Isaac Akomea-Frimpong & Xiaohua Jin & Robert Osei-Kyei, 2022. "Mapping Studies on Sustainability in the Performance Measurement of Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Umberto Mecca & Giuseppe Moglia & Paolo Piantanida & Francesco Prizzon & Manuela Rebaudengo & Antonio Vottari, 2020. "How Energy Retrofit Maintenance Affects Residential Buildings Market Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Serena Artese & Manuela De Ruggiero & Francesca Salvo & Raffaele Zinno, 2021. "Economic Convenience Judgments among Seismic Risk Mitigation Measures and Regulatory and Fiscal Provisions: The Italian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Shahid Ali & Qingyou Yan & Muhammad Sajjad Hussain & Muhammad Irfan & Munir Ahmad & Asif Razzaq & Vishal Dagar & Cem Işık, 2021. "Evaluating Green Technology Strategies for the Sustainable Development of Solar Power Projects: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, November.
    10. Giovanna Acampa & Mariolina Grasso & Giorgia Marino & Claudia Mariaserena Parisi, 2020. "Tourist Flow Management: Social Impact Evaluation through Social Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Fabrizio Battisti, 2023. "SDGs and ESG Criteria in Housing: Defining Local Evaluation Criteria and Indicators for Verifying Project Sustainability Using Florence Metropolitan Area as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-37, June.
    12. Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo & Fabiana Forte, 2020. "A Methodological Approach for the Assessment of Potentially Buildable Land for Tax Purposes: The Italian Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Enrico Fattinnanzi & Giovanna Acampa & Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo & Fabiana Forte, 2020. "Applying the Depreciated Replacement Cost Method When Assessing the Market Value of Public Property Lacking Comparables and Income Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alain Chaney & Martin Hoesli, 2015. "Transaction-Based and Appraisal-Based Capitalization Rate Determinants," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 1-43.
    2. Crystal Lin & Hamid Rahman & Kenneth Yung, 2009. "Investor Sentiment and REIT Returns," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 450-471, November.
    3. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-79.
    4. Jack Corgel & Crocker Liu & Robert White, 2015. "Determinants of Hotel Property Prices," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 415-439, October.
    5. Natalya Delcoure & Ross Dickens, 2004. "REIT and REOC Systematic Risk Sensitivity," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 26(3), pages 237-254.
    6. Marchioni, Andrea & Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2018. "Investment decisions and sensitivity analysis: NPV-consistency of rates of return," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 361-372.
    7. Enrico Fattinnanzi & Giovanna Acampa & Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo & Fabiana Forte, 2020. "Applying the Depreciated Replacement Cost Method When Assessing the Market Value of Public Property Lacking Comparables and Income Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Micheli, Leonardo & Fernandez, Eduardo F. & Aguilera, Jorge T. & Almonacid, Florencia, 2020. "Economics of seasonal photovoltaic soiling and cleaning optimization scenarios," MPRA Paper 104104, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Xiaodong Teng & Bao-Guang Chang & Kun-Shan Wu, 2021. "The Role of Financial Flexibility on Enterprise Sustainable Development during the COVID-19 Crisis—A Consideration of Tangible Assets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Daisy J. Huang & Charles Ka Yui Leung & Chung-Yi Tse, 2018. "What Accounts for the Differences in Rent-Price Ratio and Turnover Rate? A Search-and-Matching Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 431-475, October.
    11. Jamie Alcock & Eva Steiner, 2018. "Fundamental Drivers of Dependence in REIT Returns," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 4-42, July.
    12. Hui-Na Lin & Wo-Chiang Lee, 2015. "Threshold Effects in the Relationships of REITs and Other Financial Securities in Developed Countries," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(3), pages 426-438, March.
    13. Gene Birz & Erik Devos & Sandip Dutta & Khoa Nguyen & Desmond Tsang, 2022. "Ex-ante performance of REIT portfolios," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 995-1018, October.
    14. Qinghe Sun & Li Chen & Mabel C. Chou & Qiang Meng, 2023. "Mitigating the financial risk behind emission cap compliance: A case in maritime transportation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 283-300, January.
    15. Mushang Lee & Yu-Lan Huang, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: A Hybrid Text Mining Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Jun Li & Xiaoli Liang, 2020. "Beyond the Cap Rate: Valuation of Multifamily Properties," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 99-110, February.
    17. Micheli, Leonardo & Fernández, Eduardo F. & Aguilera, Jorge T. & Almonacid, Florencia, 2021. "Economics of seasonal photovoltaic soiling and cleaning optimization scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    18. Liu Xiaoxin & Wu Di & Li Xiuting & Dong Jichang, 2013. "Financing of Low-Rent Housing REITs in China," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Mariya Letdin, 2017. "Under the Lender’s Looking Glass," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 435-456, November.
    20. Wu, Yunna & Zhang, Ting & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Xiaoyu & Ke, Yiming & Chu, Han & Xu, Ruhang, 2019. "Location selection of seawater pumped hydro storage station in China based on multi-attribute decision making," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 410-425.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1371-:d:211234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.