IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i22p6360-d286271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systemic and Contextual Framework to Define a Country’s 2030 Agenda from a Foresight Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Agatha Oliveira

    (Technical Scientific Center, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro 22453-900, Brazil)

  • Rodrigo Calili

    (Technical Scientific Center, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro 22453-900, Brazil)

  • Maria Fatima Almeida

    (Technical Scientific Center, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro 22453-900, Brazil)

  • Manuel Sousa

    (Technical Scientific Center, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro 22453-900, Brazil)

Abstract

A fundamental issue in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda at the national level refers to the systemic analysis of interactions of global targets, considering the context-specific understanding of these interactions within a long-term vision. Another critical issue is how to apply and combine different approaches and tools to provide a consistent analysis for evidence-based decision-making on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and global targets. Consistent with both concerns, a systemic and contextual framework to prioritize SDG targets for a country’s 2030 Agenda is proposed, by integrating fuzzy multicriteria decision-making methods, prospective structural analysis, and network theory tools. The applicability of the proposed framework could be demonstrated through a socio-technical experiment carried out during 2018 for the definition of the 2030 Agenda in Brazil. The experiment is especially designed to bring methodological insights to this decision-making process, and empirical results highlight the targets that will drive the Brazilian 2030 Agenda. Although the empirical results presented in this paper are exclusive to Brazil, we believe that the proposed framework can be replicated in other countries, especially those that are going to prioritize the global targets to be included in their respective Agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Agatha Oliveira & Rodrigo Calili & Maria Fatima Almeida & Manuel Sousa, 2019. "A Systemic and Contextual Framework to Define a Country’s 2030 Agenda from a Foresight Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6360-:d:286271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6360/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/22/6360/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Calili, Rodrigo F. & Souza, Reinaldo C. & Galli, Alain & Armstrong, Margaret & Marcato, André Luis M., 2014. "Estimating the cost savings and avoided CO2 emissions in Brazil by implementing energy efficient policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 4-15.
    2. Wang, Ying-Ming & Luo, Ying & Hua, Zhongsheng, 2008. "On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 735-747, April.
    3. Lorenza Campagnolo & Carlo Carraro & Fabio Eboli & Luca Farnia, 2015. "Assessing SDGs: A New Methodology to Measure Sustainability," Working Papers 2015.89, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    4. Anita Breuer & Hannah Janetschek & Daniele Malerba, 2019. "Translating Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interdependencies into Policy Advice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Rodrigo F. Calili & Reinaldo C. Souza & Alain Galli & Margaret Armstrong & André Luis M. Marcato, 2014. "Estimating the cost savings and avoided CO2 emissions in Brazil by implementing energy efficient policies," Post-Print hal-01110915, HAL.
    6. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    7. Jayaraman, Raja & Colapinto, Cinzia & Torre, Davide La & Malik, Tufail, 2015. "Multi-criteria model for sustainable development using goal programming applied to the United Arab Emirates," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 447-454.
    8. Allen, Cameron & Metternicht, Graciela & Wiedmann, Thomas, 2016. "National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 199-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Yizhong Huan & Xufeng Zhu, 2023. "Interactions among sustainable development goal 15 (life on land) and other sustainable development goals: Knowledge for identifying global conservation actions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 321-333, February.
    3. Yu-Xia Tu & Oleksandr Kubatko & Vladyslav Piven & Bohdan Kovalov & Mykola Kharchenko, 2023. "Promotion of Sustainable Development in the EU: Social and Economic Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Gitana Dudzevičiūtė & Svajone Bekesiene & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Galina Ševčenko-Kozlovska, 2021. "An Assessment of the Relationship between Defence Expenditure and Sustainable Development in the Baltic Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Elena Korneeva & Nina Olinder & Wadim Strielkowski, 2021. "Consumer Attitudes to the Smart Home Technologies and the Internet of Things (IoT)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Fabienne T. Schiavo & Rodrigo F. Calili & Claudio F. de Magalhães & Isabel C. G. Fróes, 2021. "The Meaning of Electric Cars in the Context of Sustainable Transition in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Manuel Sousa & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    8. Guilherme Fonseca Bassous & Rodrigo Flora Calili & Carlos Hall Barbosa, 2021. "Development of a Low-Cost Data Acquisition System for Very Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Sousa & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making for the Achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-37, April.
    2. Seyed Meysam Khoshnava & Raheleh Rostami & Rosli Mohamad Zin & Dalia Štreimikienė & Alireza Yousefpour & Wadim Strielkowski & Abbas Mardani, 2019. "Aligning the Criteria of Green Economy (GE) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to Implement Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    3. S. Vögele & K. Govorukha & P. Mayer & I. Rhoden & D. Rübbelke & W. Kuckshinrichs, 2023. "Effects of a coal phase-out in Europe on reaching the UN Sustainable Development Goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 879-916, January.
    4. Myriam Pham‐Truffert & Florence Metz & Manuel Fischer & Henri Rueff & Peter Messerli, 2020. "Interactions among Sustainable Development Goals: Knowledge for identifying multipliers and virtuous cycles," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1236-1250, September.
    5. Christian Kroll & Anne Warchold & Prajal Pradhan, 2019. "Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. David Horan, 2021. "The SDGs as an Integrative Framework to Assess Coherence of Transnational Multistakeholder Partnerships for SIDS," Working Papers 202110, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    7. Cameron Allen & Graciela Metternicht & Thomas Wiedmann, 2021. "Priorities for science to support national implementation of the sustainable development goals: A review of progress and gaps," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 635-652, July.
    8. Breuer, Anita & Leininger, Julia & Tosun, Jale, 2019. "Integrated policymaking: Choosing an institutional design for implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," IDOS Discussion Papers 14/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    9. David Horan, 2020. "National Baselines for Integrated Implementation of an Environmental Sustainable Development Goal Assessed in a New Integrated SDG Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    10. Silva, Felipe L.C. & Souza, Reinaldo C. & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando L. & Lourenco, Plutarcho M. & Calili, Rodrigo F., 2018. "A bottom-up methodology for long term electricity consumption forecasting of an industrial sector - Application to pulp and paper sector in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1107-1118.
    11. Dawes, J.H.P., 2022. "SDG interlinkage networks: Analysis, robustness, sensitivities, and hierarchies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    12. Vieira, Nathália Duarte Braz & Nogueira, Luiz Augusto Horta & Haddad, Jamil, 2018. "An assessment of CO2 emissions avoided by energy-efficiency programs: A general methodology and a case study in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 702-715.
    13. Ana Raquel Nunes, 2023. "Mapping interactions between sustainable development and heatwave resilience," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12707-12733, November.
    14. Lorraine Eden & M. Fernanda Wagstaff, 0. "Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-30.
    15. Giglio, T. & Santos, V. & Lamberts, R., 2019. "Analyzing the impact of small solar water heating systems on peak demand and on emissions in the Brazilian context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1404-1413.
    16. Matti Ylönen & Anna Salmivaara, 2021. "Policy coherence across Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from Finland," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 829-847, September.
    17. Baldini, Mattia & Klinge Jacobsen, Henrik, 2016. "Optimal trade-offs between energy efficiency improvements and additional renewable energy supply: A review of international experiences," MPRA Paper 102031, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. David Horan, 2022. "Towards a Portfolio Approach: Partnerships for Sustainable Transformations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(1), pages 160-170, February.
    19. Lorraine Eden & M. Fernanda Wagstaff, 2021. "Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 28-57, March.
    20. Javier Linkolk López-Gonzales & Reinaldo Castro Souza & Felipe Leite Coelho da Silva & Natalí Carbo-Bustinza & Germán Ibacache-Pulgar & Rodrigo Flora Calili, 2020. "Simulation of the Energy Efficiency Auction Prices via the Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:22:p:6360-:d:286271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.